Is Hyper-Parameter Optimization Different for Software Analytics?

IF 5.6 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1109/TSE.2025.3550103
Rahul Yedida;Tim Menzies
{"title":"Is Hyper-Parameter Optimization Different for Software Analytics?","authors":"Rahul Yedida;Tim Menzies","doi":"10.1109/TSE.2025.3550103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Yes. SE data can have “smoother” boundaries between classes (compared to traditional AI data sets). To be more precise, the magnitude of the second derivative of the loss function found in SE data is typically much smaller. A new hyper-parameter optimizer, called <monospace>SMOOTHIE</monospace>, can exploit this idiosyncrasy of SE data. We compare <monospace>SMOOTHIE</monospace> and a state-of-the-art AI hyper-parameter optimizer on three tasks: (a) GitHub issue lifetime prediction (b) detecting static code warnings false alarm; (c) defect prediction. For completeness, we also show experiments on some standard AI datasets. <monospace>SMOOTHIE</monospace> runs faster and predicts better on the SE data–but ties on non-SE data with the AI tool. Hence we conclude that SE data can be different to other kinds of data; and those differences mean that we should use different kinds of algorithms for our data. To support open science and other researchers working in this area, all our scripts and datasets are available on-line at <uri>https://github.com/yrahul3910/smoothness-hpo/</uri>.","PeriodicalId":13324,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering","volume":"51 6","pages":"1629-1644"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10919477/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Yes. SE data can have “smoother” boundaries between classes (compared to traditional AI data sets). To be more precise, the magnitude of the second derivative of the loss function found in SE data is typically much smaller. A new hyper-parameter optimizer, called SMOOTHIE, can exploit this idiosyncrasy of SE data. We compare SMOOTHIE and a state-of-the-art AI hyper-parameter optimizer on three tasks: (a) GitHub issue lifetime prediction (b) detecting static code warnings false alarm; (c) defect prediction. For completeness, we also show experiments on some standard AI datasets. SMOOTHIE runs faster and predicts better on the SE data–but ties on non-SE data with the AI tool. Hence we conclude that SE data can be different to other kinds of data; and those differences mean that we should use different kinds of algorithms for our data. To support open science and other researchers working in this area, all our scripts and datasets are available on-line at https://github.com/yrahul3910/smoothness-hpo/.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超参数优化与软件分析不同吗?
是。与传统AI数据集相比,SE数据在类之间具有“更平滑”的边界。更准确地说,在SE数据中发现的损失函数的二阶导数的幅度通常要小得多。一种名为SMOOTHIE的新型超参数优化器可以利用SE数据的这种特性。我们比较了SMOOTHIE和最先进的人工智能超参数优化器在三个任务上:(a) GitHub发布生命周期预测(b)检测静态代码警告假警报;(c)缺陷预测。为了完整起见,我们还展示了在一些标准人工智能数据集上的实验。SMOOTHIE在SE数据上运行得更快,预测得更好,但它将非SE数据与AI工具联系在一起。因此,我们得出结论,SE数据可以不同于其他类型的数据;这些差异意味着我们应该对我们的数据使用不同的算法。为了支持开放科学和在这一领域工作的其他研究人员,我们所有的脚本和数据集都可以在https://github.com/yrahul3910/smoothness-hpo/上在线获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
10.80%
发文量
724
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering seeks contributions comprising well-defined theoretical results and empirical studies with potential impacts on software construction, analysis, or management. The scope of this Transactions extends from fundamental mechanisms to the development of principles and their application in specific environments. Specific topic areas include: a) Development and maintenance methods and models: Techniques and principles for specifying, designing, and implementing software systems, encompassing notations and process models. b) Assessment methods: Software tests, validation, reliability models, test and diagnosis procedures, software redundancy, design for error control, and measurements and evaluation of process and product aspects. c) Software project management: Productivity factors, cost models, schedule and organizational issues, and standards. d) Tools and environments: Specific tools, integrated tool environments, associated architectures, databases, and parallel and distributed processing issues. e) System issues: Hardware-software trade-offs. f) State-of-the-art surveys: Syntheses and comprehensive reviews of the historical development within specific areas of interest.
期刊最新文献
Automated Test Validators for Flaky Cyber-Physical System Simulators: Approach and Evaluation Synthesis with Guided Environments TriagerX: Dual Transformers for Bug Triaging Tasks with Content and Interaction Based Rankings Towards Understanding Functional Bugs in EVM-based Blockchain Systems Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning with Attributed Patch Semantic Graph for Automated Patch Correctness Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1