How the synergy effect between renewable electricity deployment and terminal electrification mitigates transportation sectors' carbon emissions in China?

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transport Policy Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.03.007
Qi Cui , Xiaofan Li , Xiaoxin Bai , Ling He , Mengting Liu
{"title":"How the synergy effect between renewable electricity deployment and terminal electrification mitigates transportation sectors' carbon emissions in China?","authors":"Qi Cui ,&nbsp;Xiaofan Li ,&nbsp;Xiaoxin Bai ,&nbsp;Ling He ,&nbsp;Mengting Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.03.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Renewable electricity deployment and terminal electrification are among the most-frequently mentioned carbon mitigation polices. However, the effectiveness of these policies and the interplays between them in reducing transportation sectors' carbon emissions in China are still poorly understood. Using a computable general equilibrium model, this study evaluates the effect of renewable electricity deployment and terminal electrification on transportation sectors' carbon emissions in China and reveals their synergy effect. It contributes to the existing literature by revealing how the synergy effect enhances the carbon reduction effects of renewable electricity deployment and terminal electrification in transportation sectors. This study finds that renewable electricity deployment has a double-dividend effect in reducing carbon emissions in transportation sectors and improving their output value, with significant sectoral heterogeneity. Terminal electrification reduces carbon emissions in all transportation sectors, while it causes some damage to their output value. The synergy effect between these policies would enhance the double-dividend effects of reducing transportation sectors’ carbon emissions and benefiting their output value, especially for those with lower electrification rates. Only the synergy effect would mitigate 7.62–42.88 Mt CO<sub>2</sub> of carbon emissions in transportation sectors by 2060, accounting for 1.69–9.53% of total carbon emission under the baseline scenario. We suggest that this synergy effect should be recognized as a key strategy for reducing carbon emissions in the transportation sector.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"166 ","pages":"Pages 135-147"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25001027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Renewable electricity deployment and terminal electrification are among the most-frequently mentioned carbon mitigation polices. However, the effectiveness of these policies and the interplays between them in reducing transportation sectors' carbon emissions in China are still poorly understood. Using a computable general equilibrium model, this study evaluates the effect of renewable electricity deployment and terminal electrification on transportation sectors' carbon emissions in China and reveals their synergy effect. It contributes to the existing literature by revealing how the synergy effect enhances the carbon reduction effects of renewable electricity deployment and terminal electrification in transportation sectors. This study finds that renewable electricity deployment has a double-dividend effect in reducing carbon emissions in transportation sectors and improving their output value, with significant sectoral heterogeneity. Terminal electrification reduces carbon emissions in all transportation sectors, while it causes some damage to their output value. The synergy effect between these policies would enhance the double-dividend effects of reducing transportation sectors’ carbon emissions and benefiting their output value, especially for those with lower electrification rates. Only the synergy effect would mitigate 7.62–42.88 Mt CO2 of carbon emissions in transportation sectors by 2060, accounting for 1.69–9.53% of total carbon emission under the baseline scenario. We suggest that this synergy effect should be recognized as a key strategy for reducing carbon emissions in the transportation sector.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可再生能源电力部署与终端电气化之间的协同效应如何缓解中国交通运输行业的碳排放?
可再生电力部署和终端电气化是最常被提及的碳减排政策。然而,这些政策的有效性以及它们之间在减少中国交通部门碳排放方面的相互作用仍然知之甚少。本文采用可计算一般均衡模型,评估了中国可再生能源电力部署和终端电气化对交通运输部门碳排放的影响,揭示了二者的协同效应。通过揭示协同效应如何增强交通运输部门可再生电力部署和终端电气化的碳减排效果,对现有文献有所贡献。研究发现,可再生能源电力部署在降低交通运输部门碳排放和提高交通运输部门产值方面具有双红利效应,且行业异质性显著。终端电气化减少了所有运输部门的碳排放,但对其产值造成了一定的损害。这些政策之间的协同效应将增强交通运输部门减少碳排放和提高其产值的双重红利效应,特别是对于电气化率较低的交通运输部门。到2060年,仅协同效应就能减少762 - 4288万吨二氧化碳的碳排放,占基线情景下总碳排放量的1.69-9.53%。我们建议,这种协同效应应被视为减少交通运输部门碳排放的关键战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
期刊最新文献
Delivering accessible school transportation services in Canada's Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area: A study of education professionals' perspectives Differences in future car-purchase intentions between undergraduates from car-owning households and non-car households Rethinking corporate mobility management: Enhancing employee loyalty through corporate mobility and transportation offerings Port group integration and regional high-quality economic development: Mechanisms and spatial effects Rethinking cost–benefit analysis for transformative cycling policies: Integrating behavioral change and the logsum method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1