Assessing the predictive value of peak alpha frequency for the sensitivity to pain.

IF 5.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY PAIN® Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003571
Elisabeth S May, Laura Tiemann, Cristina Gil Ávila, Felix S Bott, Vanessa D Hohn, Joachim Gross, Markus Ploner
{"title":"Assessing the predictive value of peak alpha frequency for the sensitivity to pain.","authors":"Elisabeth S May, Laura Tiemann, Cristina Gil Ávila, Felix S Bott, Vanessa D Hohn, Joachim Gross, Markus Ploner","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Pain perception varies considerably between and within individuals. How the brain determines these variations has yet to be fully understood. The peak frequency of alpha oscillations has recently been shown to predict an individual's sensitivity to longer-lasting experimental and clinical pain. Peak alpha frequency (PAF) is, thus, discussed as a potential biomarker and novel target for neuromodulatory treatments of pain. Here, we scrutinized the generalizability of the relation between PAF and pain. We applied brief painful laser stimuli to 159 healthy participants and related interindividual and intraindividual variations of pain perception to PAF measured with electroencephalography. Comprehensive multiverse analyses replicated across 2 sessions did not provide consistent evidence for a predictive role of PAF for brief experimental pain. This indicates that the relationship between PAF and pain does not generalize to all types of pain and calls for a systematic exploration of the relationship between PAF, pain perception, and other neuropsychiatric symptoms. Such explorations help to understand the prospects and limits of biomarkers and might guide future research on biomarkers of pain and neuropsychiatric disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":" ","pages":"2076-2090"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12363489/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAIN®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003571","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Pain perception varies considerably between and within individuals. How the brain determines these variations has yet to be fully understood. The peak frequency of alpha oscillations has recently been shown to predict an individual's sensitivity to longer-lasting experimental and clinical pain. Peak alpha frequency (PAF) is, thus, discussed as a potential biomarker and novel target for neuromodulatory treatments of pain. Here, we scrutinized the generalizability of the relation between PAF and pain. We applied brief painful laser stimuli to 159 healthy participants and related interindividual and intraindividual variations of pain perception to PAF measured with electroencephalography. Comprehensive multiverse analyses replicated across 2 sessions did not provide consistent evidence for a predictive role of PAF for brief experimental pain. This indicates that the relationship between PAF and pain does not generalize to all types of pain and calls for a systematic exploration of the relationship between PAF, pain perception, and other neuropsychiatric symptoms. Such explorations help to understand the prospects and limits of biomarkers and might guide future research on biomarkers of pain and neuropsychiatric disorders.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估阿尔法峰值频率对疼痛敏感性的预测价值。
摘要:个体之间和个体内部的疼痛感知差异很大。大脑是如何决定这些变化的还没有被完全理解。α振荡的峰值频率最近被证明可以预测一个人对更持久的实验和临床疼痛的敏感性。因此,α峰频率(PAF)被认为是疼痛神经调节治疗的潜在生物标志物和新靶点。在这里,我们仔细研究了PAF和疼痛之间关系的概括性。我们对159名健康参与者进行了短暂的疼痛激光刺激,并用脑电图测量了疼痛感知与PAF的个体间和个体内变化。在两个疗程中重复的综合多元宇宙分析并没有提供一致的证据来证明PAF对短暂实验性疼痛的预测作用。这表明PAF和疼痛之间的关系并不能推广到所有类型的疼痛,需要系统地探索PAF、疼痛感知和其他神经精神症状之间的关系。这些探索有助于了解生物标志物的前景和局限性,并可能指导未来对疼痛和神经精神疾病的生物标志物的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PAIN®
PAIN® 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
242
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: PAIN® is the official publication of the International Association for the Study of Pain and publishes original research on the nature,mechanisms and treatment of pain.PAIN® provides a forum for the dissemination of research in the basic and clinical sciences of multidisciplinary interest.
期刊最新文献
The Pelvic Pain Bias Assessment: a new assessment of interpretation bias specific to pelvic pain. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-crossover trial of treatment with a chemokine antagonist for knee osteoarthritis pain. Why can we hurt ourselves? Human agency and embodied action in the attenuation of self-induced pain. Sex differences in the impact of nerve injury on locus coeruleus function and behaviour in mice. Longitudinal pain intensity and interference symptomatology in mild traumatic brain injury: a TRACK-TBI study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1