Does gender matter? The impact of gender and gender match on the relation between destructive leadership and follower outcomes.

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY BMC Psychology Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1186/s40359-025-02566-7
Mats Reinhold, Andreas Stenling, Britt-Inger Keisu, Robert Lundmark, Susanne Tafvelin
{"title":"Does gender matter? The impact of gender and gender match on the relation between destructive leadership and follower outcomes.","authors":"Mats Reinhold, Andreas Stenling, Britt-Inger Keisu, Robert Lundmark, Susanne Tafvelin","doi":"10.1186/s40359-025-02566-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Destructive leadership has been linked to negative consequences for both organizations and followers. Research has also shown that leader gender affects follower perceptions of leadership behavior and follower outcomes [1-3]. However, knowledge is limited as to whether this also applies to destructive leadership [4]. This study aims to combine gendered organization theory with destructive leadership research to investigate the role that gender plays in the relation between destructive leadership behavior and follower outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data were collected in collaboration with Statistic Sweden. It is a representative sample from the working population in Sweden. We used a two-wave survey design and included 1,121 participants in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results from structural equation models indicated that destructive leadership has negative consequences for follower burnout, job satisfaction, and turnover intention 6 months later. The results also showed that followers reported a greater intention to leave the organization if the leader was the same gender and used destructive leadership.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study contributes to destructive leadership research by showing that the gender of both the leader and follower matters for the relation between destructive leadership behavior and follower outcomes. Additionally, our study makes a theoretical contribution by integrating a gender research perspective into destructive leadership research.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"13 1","pages":"270"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921752/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02566-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Destructive leadership has been linked to negative consequences for both organizations and followers. Research has also shown that leader gender affects follower perceptions of leadership behavior and follower outcomes [1-3]. However, knowledge is limited as to whether this also applies to destructive leadership [4]. This study aims to combine gendered organization theory with destructive leadership research to investigate the role that gender plays in the relation between destructive leadership behavior and follower outcomes.

Methods: The data were collected in collaboration with Statistic Sweden. It is a representative sample from the working population in Sweden. We used a two-wave survey design and included 1,121 participants in the analysis.

Results: The results from structural equation models indicated that destructive leadership has negative consequences for follower burnout, job satisfaction, and turnover intention 6 months later. The results also showed that followers reported a greater intention to leave the organization if the leader was the same gender and used destructive leadership.

Conclusions: Our study contributes to destructive leadership research by showing that the gender of both the leader and follower matters for the relation between destructive leadership behavior and follower outcomes. Additionally, our study makes a theoretical contribution by integrating a gender research perspective into destructive leadership research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性别重要吗?性别和性别匹配对破坏性领导与下属结果关系的影响。
背景:破坏性领导对组织和追随者都有负面影响。研究还表明,领导者的性别会影响追随者对领导行为和追随者结果的看法[1-3]。然而,对于这是否也适用于破坏性领导,人们的了解还很有限[4]。本研究旨在将性别组织理论与破坏性领导研究相结合,探讨性别在破坏性领导行为与追随者结果之间的关系中扮演的角色:数据是与瑞典统计局合作收集的。我们采用了两波调查设计。我们采用了两波调查设计,共有 1121 名参与者参与了分析:结构方程模型的结果表明,破坏性领导会对追随者的职业倦怠、工作满意度和 6 个月后的离职意向产生负面影响。结果还显示,如果领导者是同性且使用破坏性领导,则追随者更有意愿离开组织:我们的研究表明,领导者和追随者的性别对于破坏性领导行为和追随者结果之间的关系非常重要,从而为破坏性领导研究做出了贡献。此外,我们的研究还将性别研究视角融入到破坏性领导力研究中,从而在理论上做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
期刊最新文献
"The one that got away"- therapists' experiences when patients suddenly drop out from psychotherapy: a thematic analysis. Examination of the relationship between athlete identity, emotional intelligence, psychological stress and psychological resilience of university students. Psychometric validation of the Czech Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ III): long, middle, and screening versions in a nationwide sample. Cognitive and contextual configurations in entrepreneurial opportunity evaluation: insights from fsQCA. Cross-lagged panel model of depressive mood and influencing factors in high-risk perinatal depression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1