Biomarkers of Nicotine and Tobacco Carcinogen Exposure in Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Black Adults Receiving a Brief Smoking Reduction Intervention.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Pub Date : 2025-06-03 DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1789
Emma I Brett, Jessica H K Slear, Maciej L Goniewicz, Andrea C King
{"title":"Biomarkers of Nicotine and Tobacco Carcinogen Exposure in Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Black Adults Receiving a Brief Smoking Reduction Intervention.","authors":"Emma I Brett, Jessica H K Slear, Maciej L Goniewicz, Andrea C King","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retrospective reporting of cigarette use can affect the accuracy of outcomes in tobacco treatment trials. The inclusion of objective measures of smoking, such as biomarkers of nicotine and tobacco exposure, is recommended. Most trials examining biomarkers after a behavioral intervention have included predominantly White adults enrolled in cessation, versus reduction, trials. The current study examined biomarkers of nicotine and tobacco exposure within a harm reduction trial in Black adults who smoke (AWS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nontreatment-seeking socioeconomically disadvantaged Black AWS (N = 65) were randomized to a treatment-as-usual control or enhanced care single-session intervention aimed to reduce their smoking. Biospecimens were collected at baseline and 1 month after treatment to measure objective markers of nicotine and smoke exposure, including expired carbon monoxide, urinary metabolites of nicotine (cotinine and trans-3'-hydroxycotinine), and urinary tobacco-specific nitrosamine 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Those in the enhanced care condition self-reported a significant reduction in smoking at follow-up (P < 0.01), but there were no concomitant decreases across biomarkers (all P values > 0.05). Exploratory analyses in participants who reported at least 50% smoking reductions or reduced daily cigarette intake by at least three cigarettes at follow-up compared with baseline revealed nonsignificant changes across all biomarkers (all P values > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Self-reported smoking reductions were not biochemically verified across measures. It is possible that compensatory behaviors when reducing smoking (e.g., deeper inhalations) or underreporting of smoking contributed to this discrepancy.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Partial smoking reduction does not seem to reduce biomarkers of carcinogen exposure and may not be an effective strategy to narrow tobacco-related health disparities in Black AWS.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"982-989"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12133407/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1789","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Retrospective reporting of cigarette use can affect the accuracy of outcomes in tobacco treatment trials. The inclusion of objective measures of smoking, such as biomarkers of nicotine and tobacco exposure, is recommended. Most trials examining biomarkers after a behavioral intervention have included predominantly White adults enrolled in cessation, versus reduction, trials. The current study examined biomarkers of nicotine and tobacco exposure within a harm reduction trial in Black adults who smoke (AWS).

Methods: Nontreatment-seeking socioeconomically disadvantaged Black AWS (N = 65) were randomized to a treatment-as-usual control or enhanced care single-session intervention aimed to reduce their smoking. Biospecimens were collected at baseline and 1 month after treatment to measure objective markers of nicotine and smoke exposure, including expired carbon monoxide, urinary metabolites of nicotine (cotinine and trans-3'-hydroxycotinine), and urinary tobacco-specific nitrosamine 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol.

Results: Those in the enhanced care condition self-reported a significant reduction in smoking at follow-up (P < 0.01), but there were no concomitant decreases across biomarkers (all P values > 0.05). Exploratory analyses in participants who reported at least 50% smoking reductions or reduced daily cigarette intake by at least three cigarettes at follow-up compared with baseline revealed nonsignificant changes across all biomarkers (all P values > 0.05).

Conclusions: Self-reported smoking reductions were not biochemically verified across measures. It is possible that compensatory behaviors when reducing smoking (e.g., deeper inhalations) or underreporting of smoking contributed to this discrepancy.

Impact: Partial smoking reduction does not seem to reduce biomarkers of carcinogen exposure and may not be an effective strategy to narrow tobacco-related health disparities in Black AWS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受短暂减少吸烟干预的社会经济弱势黑人成年人尼古丁和烟草致癌物质暴露的生物标志物。
背景:香烟使用的回顾性报告可以影响烟草治疗试验结果的准确性。建议纳入吸烟的客观测量,如尼古丁和烟草暴露的生物标志物。大多数检查行为干预后生物标志物的试验主要包括白人成年人,他们参加了戒烟和减少试验。目前的研究在一项减少吸烟的黑人成年人(AWS)的危害试验中检测了尼古丁和烟草暴露的生物标志物。方法:不寻求治疗的社会经济弱势黑人AWS (N=65)随机分为常规治疗对照组或强化护理(EC)单次干预,旨在减少吸烟。在基线和治疗后1个月收集生物标本,测量尼古丁和烟雾暴露的客观标志物,包括过期一氧化碳、尼古丁(可替宁和反式-3'-羟基可替宁)的尿液代谢物,以及尿中烟草特异性亚硝胺4-(甲基亚硝胺)-1-(3-吡啶基)-1-丁醇(NNAL)。结果:EC患者在随访中自我报告吸烟显著减少(p .05)。与基线相比,在随访期间报告吸烟减少至少50%或每日吸烟减少至少三支的参与者中进行的探索性分析显示,所有生物标志物的变化都不显著(所有ps均为0.05)。结论:自我报告的吸烟减少没有在不同的测量中得到生化验证。可能是减少吸烟时的代偿行为(例如,更深的吸入)或少报吸烟导致了这种差异。影响:部分减少吸烟似乎并不能降低致癌物暴露的生物标志物,也可能不是缩小黑人与烟草相关的健康差异的有效策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
538
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.
期刊最新文献
Urinary Levels of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals and Breast Density in Young Women. Evaluating Efficacy of Cervical HPV-HR DNA Testing as Alternative to PET/CT Imaging for Posttreatment Cancer Surveillance: Retrospective Proof-of-Concept Study. Food Insecurity and Clinical Biomarkers of Inflammation among Cancer Survivors in the All of Us Research Program. Highly Sensitive DNA Testing of Fusobacterium nucleatum in Colorectal Tumors. Rurality of Residence and Distance to Clinic Are Risk Factors for Non-engagement in Childhood Cancer Survivor Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1