Evaluation of Convolutional Neural Network-Based Posture Identification Model of Older Adults: From Silhouette of Sagittal Photographs.

IF 2.1 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Geriatrics Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.3390/geriatrics10020049
Naoki Sugiyama, Yoshihiro Kai, Hitoshi Koda, Toru Morihara, Noriyuki Kida
{"title":"Evaluation of Convolutional Neural Network-Based Posture Identification Model of Older Adults: From Silhouette of Sagittal Photographs.","authors":"Naoki Sugiyama, Yoshihiro Kai, Hitoshi Koda, Toru Morihara, Noriyuki Kida","doi":"10.3390/geriatrics10020049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Posture is a significant indicator of health status in older adults. This study aimed to develop an automatic posture assessment tool based on sagittal photographs by validating recognition models using convolutional neural networks. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 9140 images were collected with data augmentation, and each image was labeled as either Ideal or Non-Ideal posture by physical therapists. The hidden and output layers of the models remained unchanged, while the loss function and optimizer were varied to construct four different model configurations: mean squared error and Adam (MSE & Adam), mean squared error and stochastic gradient descent (MSE & SGD), binary cross-entropy and Adam (BCE & Adam), and binary cross-entropy and stochastic gradient descent (BCE & SGD). <b>Results</b>: All four models demonstrated an improved accuracy in both the training and validation phases. However, the two BCE models exhibited divergence in validation loss, suggesting overfitting. Conversely, the two MSE models showed stability during learning. Therefore, we focused on the MSE models and evaluated their reliability using sensitivity, specificity, and Prevalence-Adjusted Bias-Adjusted Kappa (PABAK) based on the model's output and correct label. Sensitivity and specificity were 85% and 84% for MSE & Adam and 67% and 77% for MSE & SGD, respectively. Moreover, PABAK values for agreement with the correct label were 0.69 and 0.43 for MSE & Adam and MSE & SGD, respectively. <b>Conclusions</b>: Our findings indicate that the MSE & Adam model, in particular, can serve as a useful tool for screening inspections.</p>","PeriodicalId":12653,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics10020049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Posture is a significant indicator of health status in older adults. This study aimed to develop an automatic posture assessment tool based on sagittal photographs by validating recognition models using convolutional neural networks. Methods: A total of 9140 images were collected with data augmentation, and each image was labeled as either Ideal or Non-Ideal posture by physical therapists. The hidden and output layers of the models remained unchanged, while the loss function and optimizer were varied to construct four different model configurations: mean squared error and Adam (MSE & Adam), mean squared error and stochastic gradient descent (MSE & SGD), binary cross-entropy and Adam (BCE & Adam), and binary cross-entropy and stochastic gradient descent (BCE & SGD). Results: All four models demonstrated an improved accuracy in both the training and validation phases. However, the two BCE models exhibited divergence in validation loss, suggesting overfitting. Conversely, the two MSE models showed stability during learning. Therefore, we focused on the MSE models and evaluated their reliability using sensitivity, specificity, and Prevalence-Adjusted Bias-Adjusted Kappa (PABAK) based on the model's output and correct label. Sensitivity and specificity were 85% and 84% for MSE & Adam and 67% and 77% for MSE & SGD, respectively. Moreover, PABAK values for agreement with the correct label were 0.69 and 0.43 for MSE & Adam and MSE & SGD, respectively. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the MSE & Adam model, in particular, can serve as a useful tool for screening inspections.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于卷积神经网络的老年人姿势识别模型的评价:来自矢状面照片的剪影。
背景/目的:姿势是老年人健康状况的一个重要指标。本研究旨在通过验证卷积神经网络识别模型,开发基于矢状图的自动姿势评估工具。方法:收集9140张图像并进行数据增强,每张图像由物理治疗师标记为理想或非理想姿势。模型的隐含层和输出层保持不变,但改变损失函数和优化器,构建均方误差和亚当(MSE & Adam)、均方误差和随机梯度下降(MSE & SGD)、二元交叉熵和亚当(BCE & Adam)、二元交叉熵和随机梯度下降(BCE & SGD)四种不同的模型配置。结果:所有四种模型在训练和验证阶段都表现出更高的准确性。然而,两种BCE模型在验证损失上表现出分歧,表明过拟合。相反,两种MSE模型在学习过程中表现出稳定性。因此,我们将重点放在MSE模型上,并根据模型的输出和正确标签,使用灵敏度、特异性和患病率调整偏差调整Kappa (PABAK)来评估它们的可靠性。MSE和Adam的敏感性和特异性分别为85%和84%,MSE和SGD的敏感性和特异性分别为67%和77%。此外,MSE & Adam和MSE & SGD的PABAK值与正确标签的一致性分别为0.69和0.43。结论:我们的研究结果表明,特别是MSE和Adam模型,可以作为筛选检查的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geriatrics
Geriatrics 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
20.03 days
期刊介绍: • Geriatric biology • Geriatric health services research • Geriatric medicine research • Geriatric neurology, stroke, cognition and oncology • Geriatric surgery • Geriatric physical functioning, physical health and activity • Geriatric psychiatry and psychology • Geriatric nutrition • Geriatric epidemiology • Geriatric rehabilitation
期刊最新文献
Reliability and Construct Validity of the Short Physical Performance Battery in Croatian Older Adults. Dose-Response Relationship Between Sleep Regularity Index and Stage-Specific Alzheimer's Disease: Cross-Sectional Evidence from Japanese Adults. Effects of a Proactive Driving Transition Class on Extending Safe Driving and Preparing for Life After Driving Cessation Among Older Drivers. The Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) in Older Adults Receiving Multidose Drug Dispensing; Interactions, Anticholinergic and Fall-Risk Increasing Drugs. Development of a Prediction Model for Community-Dwelling Older Adults at Risk of Long-Term Care with Dementia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1