Psychometric properties and Turkish adaptation of the artificial intelligence attitude scale (AIAS-4): evidence for construct validity.

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY BMC Psychology Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1186/s40359-025-02505-6
Seydi Ahmet Satici, Sinan Okur, Fatma Betül Yilmaz, Simone Grassini
{"title":"Psychometric properties and Turkish adaptation of the artificial intelligence attitude scale (AIAS-4): evidence for construct validity.","authors":"Seydi Ahmet Satici, Sinan Okur, Fatma Betül Yilmaz, Simone Grassini","doi":"10.1186/s40359-025-02505-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) attitude scales can be used to better evaluate the benefit and drawback cons of AI. This article consists of two different studies examining attitudes towards AI. In Study I (N = 370), the four-item Artificial Intelligence Attitude Scale-4 (AIAS-4) has a one-dimensional structure as a result of confirmatory factor analysis and the fit index values ​​are at an acceptable level [Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.991; Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) = 0.989; Normed Fit Index (NFI) = 0.988; Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.973; Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) = 0.018]. Additionally, according to the results of the item response analysis conducted to support construct validity at this stage, the scale items have sufficient discrimination (discrimination value range = 2.22-3.80). Later, measurement invariance analysis revealed that the scale measured the same construct in females and males. In Study II (N = 331), the reliability of AIAS-4 was reached by calculating different reliability coefficients. Then, AI attitude was found to be associated with depression, anxiety, and stress, as well as mental health variables such as mental wellbeing and flourishing. Moreover, openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, and neuroticism are significantly related to an AI attitude. Lastly, psychological distress has a significant mediating role in the relationship between AI attitude and mental health. The findings of this pioneering research on AI attitudes were discussed and interpreted in light of the literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"13 1","pages":"297"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11934756/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02505-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) attitude scales can be used to better evaluate the benefit and drawback cons of AI. This article consists of two different studies examining attitudes towards AI. In Study I (N = 370), the four-item Artificial Intelligence Attitude Scale-4 (AIAS-4) has a one-dimensional structure as a result of confirmatory factor analysis and the fit index values ​​are at an acceptable level [Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.991; Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) = 0.989; Normed Fit Index (NFI) = 0.988; Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.973; Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) = 0.018]. Additionally, according to the results of the item response analysis conducted to support construct validity at this stage, the scale items have sufficient discrimination (discrimination value range = 2.22-3.80). Later, measurement invariance analysis revealed that the scale measured the same construct in females and males. In Study II (N = 331), the reliability of AIAS-4 was reached by calculating different reliability coefficients. Then, AI attitude was found to be associated with depression, anxiety, and stress, as well as mental health variables such as mental wellbeing and flourishing. Moreover, openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, and neuroticism are significantly related to an AI attitude. Lastly, psychological distress has a significant mediating role in the relationship between AI attitude and mental health. The findings of this pioneering research on AI attitudes were discussed and interpreted in light of the literature.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能态度量表(AIAS-4)的心理特性和土耳其语改编:构造有效性的证据。
人工智能(AI)态度量表可以用来更好地评估人工智能的利弊。这篇文章由两个不同的研究组成,研究人们对人工智能的态度。在研究一(N = 370)中,经验证性因子分析,四项人工智能态度量表-4 (AIAS-4)具有一维结构,契合指数值处于可接受水平[比较契合指数(CFI) = 0.991;拟合优度指数(GFI) = 0.989;规范拟合指数(NFI) = 0.988;Tucker-Lewis指数(TLI) = 0.973;标准化均方根残差(SRMR) = 0.018]。此外,从本阶段支持构念效度的项目反应分析结果来看,量表项目具有足够的判别性(判别值范围为2.22-3.80)。随后,测量不变性分析表明,该量表在女性和男性中测量的结构是相同的。在Study II (N = 331)中,通过计算不同的信度系数来达到AIAS-4的信度。然后,人工智能的态度被发现与抑郁、焦虑、压力以及心理健康变量(如心理健康和繁荣)有关。此外,经验开放性、严谨性、外向性和神经质与人工智能态度显著相关。最后,心理困扰在人工智能态度与心理健康的关系中具有显著的中介作用。根据文献讨论和解释了这项关于人工智能态度的开创性研究的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the moderated mediation of self-differentiation in the relationship between childhood trauma and partner abuse. Psychological flexibility patterns in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and its associations with self-care behavior and medical condition. Mental health literacy as a mediator between parental and adolescent depression and anxiety in Chinese resource-poor region. Suicidal ideation and influencing factors among hospitalized older adults with functional impairments: a mixed-methods study. Educational attainment and subjective well-being among Chinese residents: the mediating role of language proficiency and the moderating role of the Hukou system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1