Development and validation of the Commuting Satisfaction Scale with a sample of German Foreign Service employees worldwide

IF 5.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION Travel Behaviour and Society Pub Date : 2025-03-26 DOI:10.1016/j.tbs.2025.101028
Heiko Rüger , Stephan Bischof
{"title":"Development and validation of the Commuting Satisfaction Scale with a sample of German Foreign Service employees worldwide","authors":"Heiko Rüger ,&nbsp;Stephan Bischof","doi":"10.1016/j.tbs.2025.101028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Commuting satisfaction is a crucial factor influencing individuals’ well-being and travel behaviour, with important implications for policy making and traffic planning. However, validated scales for measuring individuals’ satisfaction with their daily commute to work are scarce in the literature. This paper presents and validates the Commuting Satisfaction Scale (CSS), which was developed using data from a cross-sectional survey of German Federal Foreign Office employees from various missions around the world. The scale covers seven key aspects of commuting satisfaction: duration, comfort, crowding/congestion, reliability, safety, risk of accidents, and the behaviour of others. In addition, the scale is relevant to different modes of travel: car, public transport, and walking/cycling. The results of the exploratory factor analysis revealed a one-factor structure for the CSS, and the scale is highly reliable. Consistent with theoretical assumptions and previous literature, commute duration, commute length, and travel mode are statistically significantly related to the CSS. Furthermore, higher commuting satisfaction is statistically significantly associated with higher subjective well-being, better health, and lower stress levels. This indicates high construct and criterion-related validity for the CSS, suggesting that it is a valid measure of commuting satisfaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51534,"journal":{"name":"Travel Behaviour and Society","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 101028"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Behaviour and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X25000468","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Commuting satisfaction is a crucial factor influencing individuals’ well-being and travel behaviour, with important implications for policy making and traffic planning. However, validated scales for measuring individuals’ satisfaction with their daily commute to work are scarce in the literature. This paper presents and validates the Commuting Satisfaction Scale (CSS), which was developed using data from a cross-sectional survey of German Federal Foreign Office employees from various missions around the world. The scale covers seven key aspects of commuting satisfaction: duration, comfort, crowding/congestion, reliability, safety, risk of accidents, and the behaviour of others. In addition, the scale is relevant to different modes of travel: car, public transport, and walking/cycling. The results of the exploratory factor analysis revealed a one-factor structure for the CSS, and the scale is highly reliable. Consistent with theoretical assumptions and previous literature, commute duration, commute length, and travel mode are statistically significantly related to the CSS. Furthermore, higher commuting satisfaction is statistically significantly associated with higher subjective well-being, better health, and lower stress levels. This indicates high construct and criterion-related validity for the CSS, suggesting that it is a valid measure of commuting satisfaction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通勤满意度量表的开发与验证,以德国驻外机构员工为样本
通勤满意度是影响个人福祉和出行行为的关键因素,对政策制定和交通规划具有重要影响。然而,用于衡量个人对日常通勤满意度的有效量表在文献中并不多见。本文介绍并验证了通勤满意度量表 (CSS),该量表是通过对来自世界各地的德国联邦外交部雇员的横截面调查数据编制而成的。该量表涵盖了通勤满意度的七个主要方面:持续时间、舒适度、拥挤程度、可靠性、安全性、事故风险和他人行为。此外,该量表还适用于不同的出行方式:汽车、公共交通和步行/骑自行车。探索性因子分析的结果显示,CSS 采用了单因子结构,量表的可靠性很高。与理论假设和以往文献一致的是,通勤时间、通勤长度和出行方式在统计上与 CSS 有显著的相关性。此外,通勤满意度越高,主观幸福感越高,健康状况越好,压力水平越低,这在统计学上有明显的相关性。这表明,CSS 具有较高的建构有效性和标准相关有效性,是衡量通勤满意度的有效指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Travel Behaviour and Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high-quality original papers which report leading edge research in theories, methodologies and applications concerning transportation issues and challenges which involve the social and spatial dimensions. In particular, it provides a discussion forum for major research in travel behaviour, transportation infrastructure, transportation and environmental issues, mobility and social sustainability, transportation geographic information systems (TGIS), transportation and quality of life, transportation data collection and analysis, etc.
期刊最新文献
Towards resilient transit services: Lessons from the evolution of travel-related well-being Spatial and operational interventions for healthy cruise ship design using agent-based modelling Modeling travelers’ joint car ownership and car type choice behavior: The role of autonomous vehicle safety-security perceptions Choice Preferences for Urban Air Mobility: A Latent Class Discrete Choice Model with Mixed Logit Extensions Unraveling influence of perceived service quality of drone delivery service on behavioral intentions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1