Inflammatory Markers and Postoperative New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation: Prognostic Predictions of Neutrophil Percent to Albumin Ratio in Patients with CABG.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Diagnostics Pub Date : 2025-03-16 DOI:10.3390/diagnostics15060741
Faruk Serhatlioglu, Yucel Yilmaz, Oguzhan Baran, Halis Yilmaz, Saban Kelesoglu
{"title":"Inflammatory Markers and Postoperative New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation: Prognostic Predictions of Neutrophil Percent to Albumin Ratio in Patients with CABG.","authors":"Faruk Serhatlioglu, Yucel Yilmaz, Oguzhan Baran, Halis Yilmaz, Saban Kelesoglu","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15060741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Postoperative new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) (PNOAF) is the most common complication after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and its incidence has been reported as up to 50% in studies. In this study, we investigated whether there was a relationship between PNOAF and the neutrophil percentage to albumin ratio (NPAR) levels after on-pump CABG. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 454 patients who underwent CABG were included in the study. NPAR was calculated by dividing the neutrophil count by the albumin value. <b>Results:</b> It was determined that 93 patients developed PNOAF (20.4%). When the patient groups that developed and did not develop PNOAF were compared in terms of laboratory findings, C-reactive protein (CRP) values (4.0 mg/L (2.8-7.9) vs. 2.9 mg/L (1.1-6.7), <0.001), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (2.2 (1.2-4.2) vs. 1.4 (0.7-3.1), <0.001), platelets-to-lymphocyte ratio (112 (72-177) vs. 92 (69-122), <0.001) and NPAR (2.29 (1.68-3.8) vs. 1.09 (0.79-1.81), <0.001), were found to be statistically significantly higher in the group that developed PNOAF. ROC analysis showed that the cut-off value for NPAR for the development of PNOAF was 1.86 with 78% sensitivity and 72% specificity (area under the ROC curve = 0.778, 95% CI (0.728-0.828), <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> NPAR, which can be detected by a simple venous blood test, has shown a strong predictive value for PNOAF in patients with CABG.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11941466/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15060741","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Postoperative new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) (PNOAF) is the most common complication after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and its incidence has been reported as up to 50% in studies. In this study, we investigated whether there was a relationship between PNOAF and the neutrophil percentage to albumin ratio (NPAR) levels after on-pump CABG. Methods: A total of 454 patients who underwent CABG were included in the study. NPAR was calculated by dividing the neutrophil count by the albumin value. Results: It was determined that 93 patients developed PNOAF (20.4%). When the patient groups that developed and did not develop PNOAF were compared in terms of laboratory findings, C-reactive protein (CRP) values (4.0 mg/L (2.8-7.9) vs. 2.9 mg/L (1.1-6.7), <0.001), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (2.2 (1.2-4.2) vs. 1.4 (0.7-3.1), <0.001), platelets-to-lymphocyte ratio (112 (72-177) vs. 92 (69-122), <0.001) and NPAR (2.29 (1.68-3.8) vs. 1.09 (0.79-1.81), <0.001), were found to be statistically significantly higher in the group that developed PNOAF. ROC analysis showed that the cut-off value for NPAR for the development of PNOAF was 1.86 with 78% sensitivity and 72% specificity (area under the ROC curve = 0.778, 95% CI (0.728-0.828), p < 0.001). Conclusions: NPAR, which can be detected by a simple venous blood test, has shown a strong predictive value for PNOAF in patients with CABG.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
炎症标志物和术后新发心房颤动:CABG患者中性粒细胞百分比与白蛋白比率的预后预测。
背景/目的:术后新发心房颤动(AF)(PNOAF)是冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后最常见的并发症,有研究报道其发生率高达 50%。在本研究中,我们探讨了 PNOAF 与经泵 CABG 术后中性粒细胞百分比与白蛋白比值(NPAR)水平之间是否存在关系。研究方法研究共纳入了 454 名接受 CABG 的患者。NPAR通过中性粒细胞计数除以白蛋白值计算得出。结果确定有 93 例患者(20.4%)发生了 PNOAF。将发生和未发生 PNOAF 的患者组进行实验室结果比较,C 反应蛋白 (CRP) 值(4.0 mg/L (2.8-7.9) vs. 2.9 mg/L (1.1-6.7),P < 0.001)。结论NPAR 可通过简单的静脉血液检测进行检测,对 CABG 患者的 PNOAF 有很强的预测价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
期刊最新文献
Publicly Available Large Language Models for Trichoscopy: A Head-to-Head Comparison with Dermatologists. Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasonography for Diagnosing Gastric Subepithelial Tumors. Sequential Versus Non-Sequential Polymyxin B Hemoperfusion in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Real-World Cohort Analysis of Survival in an Asian ICU. Assessment of Anxiety and Depression Symptoms Among Medical Students and Their Association with Religiosity: A Cross-Sectional Study. Ejection Fraction-Related Differences in Left Ventricular and Atrial Strain Indices Among Pediatric Fontan Circulation with Systemic Left Ventricle Morphology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1