Debates on the future of energy justice: Re-grounding the triumvirate

IF 5.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Science & Policy Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104047
Lara M. Santos Ayllón
{"title":"Debates on the future of energy justice: Re-grounding the triumvirate","authors":"Lara M. Santos Ayllón","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy justice is now a well-established pillar of the energy and social science field, primarily framed as the triumvirate of tenets of distributional, recognition and procedural justice. Triumvirate+ approaches also incorporate restorative and cosmopolitan justice. Most recently, the ‘five principles of energy justice’ was proposed to standardise the field. Prompted by the ‘five principles’ proposal alongside exchanges within critical energy justice scholarship, this perspective is framed by the debate between universalising or plural approaches to energy justice. It considers the triumvirate of tenets in relation to restorative justice, cosmopolitan justice and the triumvirate's broader pluralising potential. Particular attention is awarded to cosmopolitan justice and its anthropocentric tendency. Instead, this perspective proposes a re-grounding of energy justice in its environmental justice conceptual roots while maintaining the three tenets of distribution, procedure and recognition justice as a potential way forward. A re-grounded triumvirate of tenets, enriched by a decade of diverse scholarship and which departs from universalising approaches can continue to add important value across energy transition contexts, while preserving pluralising potential.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"167 ","pages":"Article 104047"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125000632","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Energy justice is now a well-established pillar of the energy and social science field, primarily framed as the triumvirate of tenets of distributional, recognition and procedural justice. Triumvirate+ approaches also incorporate restorative and cosmopolitan justice. Most recently, the ‘five principles of energy justice’ was proposed to standardise the field. Prompted by the ‘five principles’ proposal alongside exchanges within critical energy justice scholarship, this perspective is framed by the debate between universalising or plural approaches to energy justice. It considers the triumvirate of tenets in relation to restorative justice, cosmopolitan justice and the triumvirate's broader pluralising potential. Particular attention is awarded to cosmopolitan justice and its anthropocentric tendency. Instead, this perspective proposes a re-grounding of energy justice in its environmental justice conceptual roots while maintaining the three tenets of distribution, procedure and recognition justice as a potential way forward. A re-grounded triumvirate of tenets, enriched by a decade of diverse scholarship and which departs from universalising approaches can continue to add important value across energy transition contexts, while preserving pluralising potential.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于能源正义未来的辩论:重新确立三巨头的地位
能源正义现在是能源和社会科学领域的一个公认的支柱,主要是由分配正义、承认正义和程序正义三大原则构成的。三驾马车+ 的方法也包括恢复性和世界性的正义。最近,“能源正义的五项原则”被提出以规范该领域。在“五项原则”提案以及关键能源正义学术交流的推动下,这一观点被能源正义的普遍化或多元化方法之间的辩论所框框。它考虑了与恢复性正义、世界主义正义和三位一体更广泛的多元化潜力有关的三位一体原则。本书特别关注世界主义正义及其人类中心主义倾向。相反,这一观点提出了在其环境正义概念根源上重新建立能源正义的基础,同时保持分配、程序和承认正义的三个原则,作为一种潜在的前进道路。重新建立的三大原则,经过十年的多元化学术研究而丰富起来,脱离了普遍化的方法,可以继续在能源转型背景下增加重要价值,同时保持多元化的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Emerging circular economy practices, environmental health risks, and the “tailings paradox” in Africa’s artisanal and small-scale mining: Evidence from Ghana Whose doctrine, whose priority?: On the troublesome legal interpretation of the Aboriginal right to fish by Canadian courts From generation to treatment: A comprehensive and critical review of landfill leachate The genealogy of mining sustainability Enabling system-level trust: Polycentric governance for complex, many-scaled environmental problems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1