[Early dental visits - a systematic analysis of the information content of national dental child health records].

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Gesundheitswesen Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-02 DOI:10.1055/a-2573-5692
Kimija Rahbari, Christian Graetz, Miriam Cyris, Malin Sucherlan, Christof E Dörfer, Antje Geiken
{"title":"[Early dental visits - a systematic analysis of the information content of national dental child health records].","authors":"Kimija Rahbari, Christian Graetz, Miriam Cyris, Malin Sucherlan, Christof E Dörfer, Antje Geiken","doi":"10.1055/a-2573-5692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dental child health records have an informal character and act as a reminder of early dental visits (FU1a-c, FUPr, FLA). Long-term prevention should take place from newborns to the age of 6. However, each chamber area (n=17) has its own dental child health record (n=14). The evaluation of the formalities and the content was the aim of this study.Fourteen dental child health records were evaluated by 12 dentists with different specializations (2 each in pediatric dentistry, periodontics, prosthetics, tooth preservation, orthodontics, no specialization) from July 1st, 2023 - November 30th, 2023. The dentists used a catalogue of criteria with 81 items. The validated criteria catalogue consisted of questions about quality (Witten List, DISCERN, Hamburg Model of Comprehensibility) and other relevant topics. A descriptive analysis and statistical evaluations (Kruskal-Wallis test, asymptomatic significance test), a correlation analysis of the quality of patient information (Spearman correlation), a binary logistic regression analysis of the variables specialization of the examiner (in pediatric dentistry/not in pediatric dentistry), gender (female/male), professional experience (≤7 years/>7 years) and chamber area (eastern/western chamber areas) were carried out.The dental child health record from Bremen/Schleswig-Holstein (identical) was rated best in terms of content median (25%/75% percentile): 100.50(100.00/101.75), the dental child health record of Brandenburg was rated the worst 69, 00(66.50/73.00); p>1.00). There was good correlation between DISCERN and the Hamburg Model of Comprehensibility (ρ=0.565 (p<0.001)). According to the regression analysis, only the chamber area showed a significant influence on the content (p<0.001).There was a strong discrepancy in the quality and quantity of the dental child health records. It is important to strive towards a standardized form and congruence in content similar to that which already exists for the children's medical examination booklets.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":"646-655"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12594555/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2573-5692","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dental child health records have an informal character and act as a reminder of early dental visits (FU1a-c, FUPr, FLA). Long-term prevention should take place from newborns to the age of 6. However, each chamber area (n=17) has its own dental child health record (n=14). The evaluation of the formalities and the content was the aim of this study.Fourteen dental child health records were evaluated by 12 dentists with different specializations (2 each in pediatric dentistry, periodontics, prosthetics, tooth preservation, orthodontics, no specialization) from July 1st, 2023 - November 30th, 2023. The dentists used a catalogue of criteria with 81 items. The validated criteria catalogue consisted of questions about quality (Witten List, DISCERN, Hamburg Model of Comprehensibility) and other relevant topics. A descriptive analysis and statistical evaluations (Kruskal-Wallis test, asymptomatic significance test), a correlation analysis of the quality of patient information (Spearman correlation), a binary logistic regression analysis of the variables specialization of the examiner (in pediatric dentistry/not in pediatric dentistry), gender (female/male), professional experience (≤7 years/>7 years) and chamber area (eastern/western chamber areas) were carried out.The dental child health record from Bremen/Schleswig-Holstein (identical) was rated best in terms of content median (25%/75% percentile): 100.50(100.00/101.75), the dental child health record of Brandenburg was rated the worst 69, 00(66.50/73.00); p>1.00). There was good correlation between DISCERN and the Hamburg Model of Comprehensibility (ρ=0.565 (p<0.001)). According to the regression analysis, only the chamber area showed a significant influence on the content (p<0.001).There was a strong discrepancy in the quality and quantity of the dental child health records. It is important to strive towards a standardized form and congruence in content similar to that which already exists for the children's medical examination booklets.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[早期牙科就诊——全国牙科儿童健康档案信息内容的系统分析]。
牙科儿童健康记录具有非正式的特征,并作为早期牙科就诊的提醒(FU1a-c, FUPr, FLA)。从新生儿到6岁应进行长期预防。然而,每个房间区域(n=17)都有自己的牙科儿童健康记录(n=14)。本研究的目的是对其形式和内容进行评价。本研究由12名不同专业(儿童牙科、牙周学、修复学、牙齿保存学、正畸学、非专业各2名)的牙医于2023年7月1日至2023年11月30日对14份牙科儿童健康记录进行评估。牙医们使用了一份包含81项标准的目录。经过验证的标准目录包括关于质量的问题(Witten List, DISCERN,汉堡可理解性模型)和其他相关主题。描述性分析和统计评价(Kruskal-Wallis检验、无症状显著性检验)、患者信息质量的相关分析(Spearman相关)、检查人员专业(儿科牙科/非儿科牙科)、性别(女/男)、专业经验(≤7年/> - 7年)和腔室面积(东/西腔室)的二元logistic回归分析。不莱梅/石勒苏维格-荷尔斯泰因(相同)地区儿童牙科健康记录的内容中位数(25%/75%百分位数)为100.50(100.00/101.75),其中不莱梅/石勒苏维格-荷尔斯泰因地区儿童牙科健康记录的内容中位数(25%/75%百分位数)为最好,勃兰登堡州儿童牙科健康记录的内容中位数为69,00 (66.50/73.00);p > 1.00)。在DISCERN和汉堡可理解性模型之间有很好的相关性(ρ=0.565 (p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gesundheitswesen
Gesundheitswesen PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
308
期刊介绍: The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.
期刊最新文献
[Medical Delegation to Physician Assistants (PAs): Organizational Liability as the Primary Risk in Borderline Cases]. [Some thoughts on "Querdenken" yesterday and today - from the Berlin anti-Semitism controversy in the 19th century to "Querdenken" in the 21st century]. [Sektorenübergreifende Bewegungsversorgung - eine qualitative Studie zu den Aufgaben und Kompetenzen in der Netzwerkkoordination am Beispiel des Netzwerks ActiveOncoKids (NAOK)]. [Medical resource needs and telemedical potential in after-hours care: An exploratory survey among physicians]. [Correction: Challenges in Rehabilitation of People with Cognitive and/or Multiple Impairments: Insights from a Pilot Study].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1