Presentation of the ENDO-SFOG CAMPUS app: An easy therapeutic decision support app in endometrial cancer created by the French Society of Young Gynecological Oncologists (SFOG Campus)
{"title":"Presentation of the ENDO-SFOG CAMPUS app: An easy therapeutic decision support app in endometrial cancer created by the French Society of Young Gynecological Oncologists (SFOG Campus)","authors":"Virginie Collin-Bund , Floriane Jochum , François Margueritte , Thomas Gaillard , Morgane Perrin , Yohan Kerbage , Renaud Sabatier , Anne Thoury , Sarah Betrian , Guillaume Babin , Basile Pache , Phuong Lien Tran , Noémie Body , Julie Delvallee , Houssein El Hajj , Frederic Guyon , Emilie Raimond , Chérif Akladios , Enora Laas , Elise Deluche","doi":"10.1016/j.jogoh.2025.102951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study evaluates a new decision support tool—a computer/mobile application designed to align with the latest ESGO guidelines, French practices, and molecular biology data—to aid in decision-making for endometrial cancer management.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An observational, multicenter, retrospective study was conducted. It compared management decisions from multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs) with those suggested by the application for patients with histologically confirmed endometrial cancer, irrespective of their FIGO stage. Each center included the last 20 cases discussed in multidisciplinary tumor boards between May to December 2022.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirteen centers participated: eight university hospitals (61.5 %), four cancer centers (30.8 %), and one private center (7.7 %). A total of 259 patients were included, with a mean age of 69 years (range 30−96 years). Most patients had endometrioid tumors (77.2 %), low-grade (62.6 %), FIGO stage IA (41.3 %), no lymphovascular invasion (77.9 %), and a non-specific molecular profile (50.6 %). The application's recommendations matched the MTB decisions 76.6 % of the time. Discrepancies arose mainly from the non-administration of brachytherapy (22.8 %), rare presentations or pathological discordance (22.8 %), and patients' deteriorated conditions precluding standard treatments (19.3 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The SFOG campus application demonstrates a high concordance with multidisciplinary tumor board decisions, indicating its potential as an efficient, and valuable tool for managing endometrial cancer.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","volume":"54 6","pages":"Article 102951"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784725000480","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
This study evaluates a new decision support tool—a computer/mobile application designed to align with the latest ESGO guidelines, French practices, and molecular biology data—to aid in decision-making for endometrial cancer management.
Methods
An observational, multicenter, retrospective study was conducted. It compared management decisions from multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs) with those suggested by the application for patients with histologically confirmed endometrial cancer, irrespective of their FIGO stage. Each center included the last 20 cases discussed in multidisciplinary tumor boards between May to December 2022.
Results
Thirteen centers participated: eight university hospitals (61.5 %), four cancer centers (30.8 %), and one private center (7.7 %). A total of 259 patients were included, with a mean age of 69 years (range 30−96 years). Most patients had endometrioid tumors (77.2 %), low-grade (62.6 %), FIGO stage IA (41.3 %), no lymphovascular invasion (77.9 %), and a non-specific molecular profile (50.6 %). The application's recommendations matched the MTB decisions 76.6 % of the time. Discrepancies arose mainly from the non-administration of brachytherapy (22.8 %), rare presentations or pathological discordance (22.8 %), and patients' deteriorated conditions precluding standard treatments (19.3 %).
Conclusion
The SFOG campus application demonstrates a high concordance with multidisciplinary tumor board decisions, indicating its potential as an efficient, and valuable tool for managing endometrial cancer.
期刊介绍:
Formerly known as Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction is the official Academic publication of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français / CNGOF).
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod publishes monthly, in English, research papers and techniques in the fields of Gynecology, Obstetrics, Neonatology and Human Reproduction: (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, updates, technical notes, case reports, letters to the editor and guidelines.
Original works include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.