Performance of Non-Puddled Machine Transplanted Rice over Puddled Machine Transplanted Rice in Thanjavur District of Tamil Nadu

IF 1.3 4区 综合性期刊 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES National Academy Science Letters Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1007/s40009-025-01620-7
S. Elamathi, K. Subrahmaniyan, M. Raju, C. Umamaheswari, P. Anandhi
{"title":"Performance of Non-Puddled Machine Transplanted Rice over Puddled Machine Transplanted Rice in Thanjavur District of Tamil Nadu","authors":"S. Elamathi,&nbsp;K. Subrahmaniyan,&nbsp;M. Raju,&nbsp;C. Umamaheswari,&nbsp;P. Anandhi","doi":"10.1007/s40009-025-01620-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Manual transplanted rice is labor-intensive, requires a large amount of water, and makes soil poor. Keeping this in view, Non-puddled machine transplanted rice (NPMTR) as an alternative planting technique for puddled machine transplanted rice (PMTR) was tested at Tamil Nadu Rice Research Institute (TRRI), Aduthurai during <i>Kharif</i> seasons 2016 to 2020. The experimental data was analyzed using an independent two-sample t-test. The statistical analysis results indicated that NPMTR and PMTR rice planting techniques did not show any significant difference in rice grain yields and recorded 4.82 and 5.06 t/ha respectively. However, a significant (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.00) higher water use efficiency (4.852 kg/ ha mm) was observed under NPMTR, saving approximately 21% water with a 4.97% yield penalty compared to PMTR. In addition, economic analysis results also indicated a higher benefit-cost ratio (B: C Ratio) of 2.29 under NPMTR than 2.09 in PMTR. NPMTR is cost-effective (less production cost ₹ 5880/ha), resource-saving (fuel 26 L/ ha, energy (1220 MJ/ ha), time (5.5 h/ ha) and water (250.4 mm/ ha), easy to practice and reliable rice transplanting method under fast-changing global climatic conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":717,"journal":{"name":"National Academy Science Letters","volume":"48 2","pages":"149 - 152"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Academy Science Letters","FirstCategoryId":"4","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40009-025-01620-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Manual transplanted rice is labor-intensive, requires a large amount of water, and makes soil poor. Keeping this in view, Non-puddled machine transplanted rice (NPMTR) as an alternative planting technique for puddled machine transplanted rice (PMTR) was tested at Tamil Nadu Rice Research Institute (TRRI), Aduthurai during Kharif seasons 2016 to 2020. The experimental data was analyzed using an independent two-sample t-test. The statistical analysis results indicated that NPMTR and PMTR rice planting techniques did not show any significant difference in rice grain yields and recorded 4.82 and 5.06 t/ha respectively. However, a significant (P < 0.00) higher water use efficiency (4.852 kg/ ha mm) was observed under NPMTR, saving approximately 21% water with a 4.97% yield penalty compared to PMTR. In addition, economic analysis results also indicated a higher benefit-cost ratio (B: C Ratio) of 2.29 under NPMTR than 2.09 in PMTR. NPMTR is cost-effective (less production cost ₹ 5880/ha), resource-saving (fuel 26 L/ ha, energy (1220 MJ/ ha), time (5.5 h/ ha) and water (250.4 mm/ ha), easy to practice and reliable rice transplanting method under fast-changing global climatic conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泰米尔纳德邦Thanjavur地区非水坑机插秧水稻比水坑机插秧水稻的性能
人工插秧是劳动密集型的,需要大量的水,使土壤贫瘠。考虑到这一点,2016年至2020年的哈里夫季节,泰米尔纳德邦水稻研究所(TRRI)在Aduthurai对非水坑机插秧水稻(NPMTR)作为水坑机插秧水稻(PMTR)的替代种植技术进行了测试。实验数据采用独立双样本t检验进行分析。统计分析结果表明,NPMTR和PMTR水稻种植技术对水稻产量无显著影响,分别为4.82和5.06 t/ha。然而,与PMTR相比,NPMTR的水利用效率显著(P < 0.00)更高(4.852 kg/ hm2),节水约21%,产量损失4.97%。此外,经济分析结果也表明,NPMTR的效益成本比(B: C ratio)为2.29,高于PMTR的2.09。NPMTR具有成本效益高(生产成本5880卢比/公顷),节约资源(燃料26升/公顷,能源(1220 MJ/公顷),时间(5.5小时/公顷)和水(250.4毫米/公顷),在快速变化的全球气候条件下易于实践和可靠的水稻移栽方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
National Academy Science Letters
National Academy Science Letters 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The National Academy Science Letters is published by the National Academy of Sciences, India, since 1978. The publication of this unique journal was started with a view to give quick and wide publicity to the innovations in all fields of science
期刊最新文献
Performance of Non-Puddled Machine Transplanted Rice over Puddled Machine Transplanted Rice in Thanjavur District of Tamil Nadu Modified Normalized Difference Water Index Mapping of Pune District Using Google Earth Engine Immobilization of Chromium Concentration in Wheat Crop by the Application of Sugarcane Industrial Waste Characterization of Canopy Temperature in Bread Wheat Genotypes under Terminal Heat Stress Endophytic Beauveria Bassiana Isolates Induce Salinity Tolerance in Jute Plant (Corchorus Capsularis) by up-regulated Volatile Chemical Gene GDSL/KAT3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1