Glycemic control and coagulation inhibitors in diabetic patients.

Haemostasis Pub Date : 1998-11-01 DOI:10.1159/000022447
H Altunbaş, U Karayalçin, L Undar
{"title":"Glycemic control and coagulation inhibitors in diabetic patients.","authors":"H Altunbaş,&nbsp;U Karayalçin,&nbsp;L Undar","doi":"10.1159/000022447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the plasma antigenic levels and functional activities of coagulation inhibitors in poorly controlled diabetic patients and the possible effect of good glycemic control on these parameters.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Both functional activities and plasma antigenic levels of coagulation inhibitors (antithrombin III, heparin cofactor II, protein C, and protein S) and plasma levels of C4b-binding protein were measured in 28 diabetic patients (13 males, 15 females; 2 IDDM, 26 NIDDM; median age 56.5 years; median duration of diabetes 5.5 years) with poor glycemic control (median HbA(1c) 11.8%). Twenty-three healthy subjects were enrolled as controls. Following a 3-month intensification of antihyperglycemic therapy, good glycemic control (HbA(1c) <8%) was achieved in 17 patients, and the plasma levels of the same parameters during this period were compared with baseline values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Functional activities and plasma antigenic levels of coagulation inhibitors were comparable in poorly controlled diabetic patients and healthy subjects. In patients achieving good control after 3 months, there was a significant reduction in plasma antigenic levels of protein S (p = 0.005) and C4b-binding protein (p = 0.03); however, no difference could be observed in other parameters. HbA(1c) did not show any correlation with plasma antigenic levels or functional activities of coagulation inhibitors either at baseline or at 3 months of good glycemic control.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that in poorly controlled diabetic patients, coagulation inhibitors are not different from healthy controls. Short-term good glycemic control may not exert a profound effect on coagulation inhibitors except protein S and its binding protein, C4b-binding protein.</p>","PeriodicalId":12910,"journal":{"name":"Haemostasis","volume":"28 6","pages":"307-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000022447","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000022447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the plasma antigenic levels and functional activities of coagulation inhibitors in poorly controlled diabetic patients and the possible effect of good glycemic control on these parameters.

Research design and methods: Both functional activities and plasma antigenic levels of coagulation inhibitors (antithrombin III, heparin cofactor II, protein C, and protein S) and plasma levels of C4b-binding protein were measured in 28 diabetic patients (13 males, 15 females; 2 IDDM, 26 NIDDM; median age 56.5 years; median duration of diabetes 5.5 years) with poor glycemic control (median HbA(1c) 11.8%). Twenty-three healthy subjects were enrolled as controls. Following a 3-month intensification of antihyperglycemic therapy, good glycemic control (HbA(1c) <8%) was achieved in 17 patients, and the plasma levels of the same parameters during this period were compared with baseline values.

Results: Functional activities and plasma antigenic levels of coagulation inhibitors were comparable in poorly controlled diabetic patients and healthy subjects. In patients achieving good control after 3 months, there was a significant reduction in plasma antigenic levels of protein S (p = 0.005) and C4b-binding protein (p = 0.03); however, no difference could be observed in other parameters. HbA(1c) did not show any correlation with plasma antigenic levels or functional activities of coagulation inhibitors either at baseline or at 3 months of good glycemic control.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that in poorly controlled diabetic patients, coagulation inhibitors are not different from healthy controls. Short-term good glycemic control may not exert a profound effect on coagulation inhibitors except protein S and its binding protein, C4b-binding protein.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖尿病患者的血糖控制和凝血抑制剂。
目的:探讨血糖控制不良的糖尿病患者血浆抗原性水平和凝血抑制剂的功能活性,以及良好的血糖控制对这些指标的可能影响。研究设计与方法:测定28例糖尿病患者(男性13例,女性15例;2个iddm, 26个iddm;中位年龄56.5岁;糖尿病中位病程5.5年),血糖控制不良(中位HbA(1c) 11.8%)。23名健康受试者作为对照。强化降糖治疗3个月后,血糖控制良好(HbA(1c))结果:凝血抑制剂的功能活性和血浆抗原水平在控制不良的糖尿病患者和健康受试者中是相当的。在3个月后获得良好控制的患者中,血浆抗原蛋白S (p = 0.005)和c4b结合蛋白(p = 0.03)水平显著降低;但其他参数无明显差异。在基线或血糖控制良好的3个月时,HbA(1c)与血浆抗原水平或凝血抑制剂的功能活性没有任何相关性。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在控制不良的糖尿病患者中,凝血抑制剂与健康对照组没有什么不同。短期良好的血糖控制可能不会对凝血抑制剂产生深远的影响,除了蛋白S及其结合蛋白c4b结合蛋白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characterization of murine anti-glycoprotein Ib monoclonal antibodies that differentiate between shear-induced and ristocetin/botrocetin-induced glycoprotein Ib-von Willebrand factor interaction. Comparison of different methods to measure fibrinogen concentration in canine plasma with respect to their sensitivity towards the fibrinogen degradation products X, Y and D. Endothelial function, variables of fibrinolysis and coagulation in smokers and healthy controls. Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria and the risk of venous thrombosis: review and recommendations for management of the pregnant and nonpregnant patient. Factor V (His 1299 Arg) in young Turkish patients with cerebral infarct.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1