Plan and operation of the NHANES II Mortality Study, 1992.

C M Loria, C T Sempos, C Vuong
{"title":"Plan and operation of the NHANES II Mortality Study, 1992.","authors":"C M Loria, C T Sempos, C Vuong","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The NHANES II Mortality Study is a prospective study of adult participants examined in the second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES II) conducted between 1976 and 1980. It was designed to investigate the association between factors measured at baseline and mortality. The methods used in the study are described and assessed in this report.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The vital status of NHANES II participants who were 30-75 years of age at their examination was ascertained after 12-16 years. Vital status was assessed by searching the National Death Index and the Social Security Administration Death Master File for deaths occurring in the United States. Causes of death were obtained from the National Center for Health Statistics Multiple Cause of Death file or death certificates. To assess how well mortality was ascertained, the survival of the cohort after 5 and 10 years was compared to that of the U.S. population during the same period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As of December 31, 1992, 23.2 percent of the 9,250 cohort members were found to be deceased. The remaining 76.8 percent that were not found to be deceased may be assumed to be alive for analytic purposes. Cumulative survival probabilities for the cohort were generally higher than probabilities calculated from U.S. life table data. Although some differences were expected, these data suggest that after 10 years of follow-up using passive methods, mortality may have been under ascertained for the cohort. Discrepancies between the survival patterns for NHANES II cohort and U.S. vital statistics were larger for black than for white participants, indicating that ascertainment of mortality was poorer among black participants. Researchers using the NHANES II Mortality Study, 1992 data should be aware of these study limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":38828,"journal":{"name":"Vital and health statistics. Ser. 1: Programs and collection procedures","volume":" 38","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vital and health statistics. Ser. 1: Programs and collection procedures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The NHANES II Mortality Study is a prospective study of adult participants examined in the second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES II) conducted between 1976 and 1980. It was designed to investigate the association between factors measured at baseline and mortality. The methods used in the study are described and assessed in this report.

Methods: The vital status of NHANES II participants who were 30-75 years of age at their examination was ascertained after 12-16 years. Vital status was assessed by searching the National Death Index and the Social Security Administration Death Master File for deaths occurring in the United States. Causes of death were obtained from the National Center for Health Statistics Multiple Cause of Death file or death certificates. To assess how well mortality was ascertained, the survival of the cohort after 5 and 10 years was compared to that of the U.S. population during the same period.

Results: As of December 31, 1992, 23.2 percent of the 9,250 cohort members were found to be deceased. The remaining 76.8 percent that were not found to be deceased may be assumed to be alive for analytic purposes. Cumulative survival probabilities for the cohort were generally higher than probabilities calculated from U.S. life table data. Although some differences were expected, these data suggest that after 10 years of follow-up using passive methods, mortality may have been under ascertained for the cohort. Discrepancies between the survival patterns for NHANES II cohort and U.S. vital statistics were larger for black than for white participants, indicating that ascertainment of mortality was poorer among black participants. Researchers using the NHANES II Mortality Study, 1992 data should be aware of these study limitations.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1992 年 NHANES II 死亡率研究的计划和运作。
研究目的NHANES II 死亡率研究是一项前瞻性研究,研究对象是 1976 年至 1980 年间参加第二次全国健康与营养调查(NHANES II)的成年参与者。该研究旨在调查基线测量因素与死亡率之间的关系。本报告对研究中使用的方法进行了描述和评估:NHANES II 参与者在接受检查时年龄为 30-75 岁,12-16 年后确定其生命状态。生命状况是通过搜索美国国家死亡索引和社会保障局死亡主文件来评估的。死亡原因来自国家卫生统计中心的多死因档案或死亡证明。为了评估死亡率的确定程度,将该群体 5 年和 10 年后的存活率与同期美国人口的存活率进行了比较:截至 1992 年 12 月 31 日,9,250 名群体成员中有 23.2% 已经死亡。其余 76.8% 的未发现死亡者可假定为在世,以便进行分析。群组的累积生存概率普遍高于根据美国生命表数据计算出的概率。尽管存在一些差异是意料之中的,但这些数据表明,在使用被动方法进行 10 年的随访后,队列中的死亡率可能没有得到充分确定。NHANES II 组群的生存模式与美国生命统计数据之间的差异在黑人参与者中比在白人参与者中更大,这表明黑人参与者的死亡率确认情况较差。使用 1992 年 NHANES II 死亡率研究数据的研究人员应注意这些研究局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Reports describing the general programs of the National Center for Health Statistics and its offices and divisions and the data collection methods used. Series 1 reports also include definitions and other material necessary for understanding the data.
期刊最新文献
Plan and Operations of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, August 2021-August 2023. Assessing Laboratory Method Validations for Informing Inference Across Survey Cycles in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Developing Sampling Weights for Statistical Analysis of Parent-Child Pair Data From the National Health Interview Survey. Validation of the Enhanced Opioid Identification and Co-occurring Disorders Algorithms. National Center for Health Statistics' 2019 Research and Development Survey, RANDS 3.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1