Comparison of two systems for tibial external fixation in rabbits.

Laboratory animal science Pub Date : 1999-12-01
R H Meffert, J E Tis, S Lounici, J S Rogers, N Inoue, E Y Chao
{"title":"Comparison of two systems for tibial external fixation in rabbits.","authors":"R H Meffert,&nbsp;J E Tis,&nbsp;S Lounici,&nbsp;J S Rogers,&nbsp;N Inoue,&nbsp;E Y Chao","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Use of rabbits in orthopedic investigations is common. In this study, focus is on factors that influence bone healing and on distraction osteogenesis. Biomechanical characteristics of two external fixator systems (Orthofix device and Hoffmann device) for long bones were tested.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve freshly dissected tibiae were obtained from six skeletally mature New Zealand White rabbits, and four-point bending stiffness in two planes (90 and 180 degrees to the fixator pins) and torsional stiffness and strength of the bone-fixator complex were evaluated by use of a material testing machine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In four-point bending, Orthofix device had higher stiffness and strength, compared with Hoffmann device. When the load was applied 180 degrees to the pins, both devices had higher stiffness, compared with that at 90 degrees. In torsional testing, Orthofix device had significantly higher stiffness and strength.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant differences in structural properties between the two systems were evident. Loading direction and gap conditions were important factors in determining properties of the systems. Therefore, type of external fixation system and fixation technique should be considered when designing experiments, using the rabbit long bone model.</p>","PeriodicalId":17937,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory animal science","volume":"49 6","pages":"650-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory animal science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Use of rabbits in orthopedic investigations is common. In this study, focus is on factors that influence bone healing and on distraction osteogenesis. Biomechanical characteristics of two external fixator systems (Orthofix device and Hoffmann device) for long bones were tested.

Methods: Twelve freshly dissected tibiae were obtained from six skeletally mature New Zealand White rabbits, and four-point bending stiffness in two planes (90 and 180 degrees to the fixator pins) and torsional stiffness and strength of the bone-fixator complex were evaluated by use of a material testing machine.

Results: In four-point bending, Orthofix device had higher stiffness and strength, compared with Hoffmann device. When the load was applied 180 degrees to the pins, both devices had higher stiffness, compared with that at 90 degrees. In torsional testing, Orthofix device had significantly higher stiffness and strength.

Conclusions: Significant differences in structural properties between the two systems were evident. Loading direction and gap conditions were important factors in determining properties of the systems. Therefore, type of external fixation system and fixation technique should be considered when designing experiments, using the rabbit long bone model.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家兔胫骨外固定架两种系统的比较。
背景与目的:利用家兔进行骨科调查是很常见的。本研究的重点是影响骨愈合和牵张成骨的因素。测试了两种用于长骨的外固定架系统(Orthofix装置和Hoffmann装置)的生物力学特性。方法:取6只成年新西兰大白兔新鲜解剖胫骨12块,采用材料试验机评估骨-固定物复合物在与固定钉90度和180度两个平面上的四点弯曲刚度以及扭转刚度和强度。结果:在四点弯曲中,Orthofix装置比Hoffmann装置具有更高的刚度和强度。当载荷与销钉呈180度时,两个装置的刚度都比90度时高。在扭转试验中,Orthofix装置具有明显更高的刚度和强度。结论:两种系统的结构特性有明显差异。加载方向和间隙条件是决定系统性能的重要因素。因此,采用兔长骨模型设计实验时应考虑外固定系统的类型和固定技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nonhuman primate models of atherosclerosis. Comparison of two systems for tibial external fixation in rabbits. Comparison of three treatments for control of ear mites in ferrets. Effects of histamine, carbachol, and methacholine on maximal expiratory lung mechanics in goats. Depressive effects of anesthesia or sedation on exocrine pancreatic function in pigs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1