The Pentagon attack of September 11, 2001: a burn center's experience.

Marion H Jordan, Kathleen A Hollowed, Dale G Turner, Dennis S Wang, James C Jeng
{"title":"The Pentagon attack of September 11, 2001: a burn center's experience.","authors":"Marion H Jordan,&nbsp;Kathleen A Hollowed,&nbsp;Dale G Turner,&nbsp;Dennis S Wang,&nbsp;James C Jeng","doi":"10.1097/01.bcr.0000155539.82870.64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>On September 11, 2001, an airplane flown by terrorists crashed into the Pentagon, causing a mass casualty incident with 189 deaths and 106 persons treated for injuries in local hospitals. Nine burn victims and one victim with an inhalation injury only were transported to the burn center hospital. The Burn Center at Washington Hospital Center admitted and treated the acute burn patients while continuing its mission as the regional burn center for the Washington DC region. Eight of the nine burn patients survived. Lessons learned include 1) A large-volume burn center hospital can absorb nine acute burns and maintain burn center and hospital operations, but the decision to keep or transfer burn patients must be tempered with the reality that several large burns can double or triple the work load for 2 to 3 months. 2) Transfer decisions should have high priority and be timely to ensure optimum care for the patients without need for movement of medical personnel from one burn center to another. 3) The reserve capacity of burn beds in the United States is limited, and the burn centers and the American Burn Association must continue to seek recognition and support from Congress and the federal agencies for optimal preparedness.</p>","PeriodicalId":22626,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation","volume":"26 2","pages":"109-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/01.bcr.0000155539.82870.64","citationCount":"50","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bcr.0000155539.82870.64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50

Abstract

On September 11, 2001, an airplane flown by terrorists crashed into the Pentagon, causing a mass casualty incident with 189 deaths and 106 persons treated for injuries in local hospitals. Nine burn victims and one victim with an inhalation injury only were transported to the burn center hospital. The Burn Center at Washington Hospital Center admitted and treated the acute burn patients while continuing its mission as the regional burn center for the Washington DC region. Eight of the nine burn patients survived. Lessons learned include 1) A large-volume burn center hospital can absorb nine acute burns and maintain burn center and hospital operations, but the decision to keep or transfer burn patients must be tempered with the reality that several large burns can double or triple the work load for 2 to 3 months. 2) Transfer decisions should have high priority and be timely to ensure optimum care for the patients without need for movement of medical personnel from one burn center to another. 3) The reserve capacity of burn beds in the United States is limited, and the burn centers and the American Burn Association must continue to seek recognition and support from Congress and the federal agencies for optimal preparedness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2001年9月11日五角大楼袭击:烧伤中心的经验。
2001年9月11日,一架恐怖分子驾驶的飞机撞上五角大楼,造成大规模伤亡事件,189人死亡,106人受伤,在当地医院接受治疗。九名烧伤受害者和一名只有吸入性损伤的受害者被送往烧伤中心医院。华盛顿医院中心的烧伤中心收治并治疗急性烧伤患者,同时继续其作为华盛顿特区区域烧伤中心的使命。9名烧伤患者中有8名幸存。经验教训包括:1)一个大容量的烧伤中心医院可以吸收9例急性烧伤,并维持烧伤中心和医院的手术,但在决定保留或转移烧伤患者时,必须考虑到几个大的烧伤会使工作负荷增加一倍或三倍,持续2到3个月。2)转移决策应具有高优先级和及时性,以确保患者获得最佳护理,而不需要医务人员从一个烧伤中心转移到另一个烧伤中心。3)美国烧伤床的储备能力是有限的,烧伤中心和美国烧伤协会必须继续寻求国会和联邦机构的认可和支持,以实现最佳的准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Americans With Disabilities Act. Celebrating progress in psychosocial rehabilitation: empirically validating the efficacy of social skills training and body image assessment for burn survivors. Efficacy of a short-term, intensive social skills training program for burned adolescents. Bacteriological profile and antibiotic resistance: comparison of findings in a burn intensive care unit, other intensive care units, and the hospital services unit of a single center. Ginkgo biloba extract improves oxidative organ damage in a rat model of thermal trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1