Test-Retest Reliability of the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C and the Elkins Hypnotizability Scale.

IF 2 4区心理学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1080/00207144.2021.1834858

Zoltan Kekecs, Lynae Roberts, Hyeji Na, Ming Hwei Yek, Elizabeth E Slonena, Ezrhiel Racelis, Tamara A Voor, Robert Johansson, Pietro Rizzo, Endre Csikos, Vanda Vizkievicz, Gary Elkins

{"title":"Test-Retest Reliability of the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C and the Elkins Hypnotizability Scale.","authors":"Zoltan Kekecs, Lynae Roberts, Hyeji Na, Ming Hwei Yek, Elizabeth E Slonena, Ezrhiel Racelis, Tamara A Voor, Robert Johansson, Pietro Rizzo, Endre Csikos, Vanda Vizkievicz, Gary Elkins","doi":"10.1080/00207144.2021.1834858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This project aimed to assess the consistency of hypnotizability over repeated assessments when measured by the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale: Form C (SHSS:C), and the Elkins Hypnotizability Scale (EHS) and to contrast score distribution and pleasantness of these scales. University students were administered either the SHSS:C or the EHS twice with a one-week delay by separate experimenters. Test-retest reliability of the EHS and the SHSS:C was r s =.82 (.71-.92) and r s =.66, 95% (.47-.86), respectively (Spearman's correlation). Hypnotizability was comparable at test and retest in the EHS group, SHSS:C scores decreased by the retest. We found that the SHSS:C produced higher scores than the EHS, and the pleasantness of the 2 scales was comparable. Overall, our results supported the reliability of the EHS, while SHSS:C scores were more inconsistent between the 2 assessments. More research is warranted.","PeriodicalId":13896,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis","volume":"69 1","pages":"142-161"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00207144.2021.1834858","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2021.1834858","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 12

Abstract

This project aimed to assess the consistency of hypnotizability over repeated assessments when measured by the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale: Form C (SHSS:C), and the Elkins Hypnotizability Scale (EHS) and to contrast score distribution and pleasantness of these scales. University students were administered either the SHSS:C or the EHS twice with a one-week delay by separate experimenters. Test-retest reliability of the EHS and the SHSS:C was r _s =.82 (.71-.92) and r _s =.66, 95% (.47-.86), respectively (Spearman's correlation). Hypnotizability was comparable at test and retest in the EHS group, SHSS:C scores decreased by the retest. We found that the SHSS:C produced higher scores than the EHS, and the pleasantness of the 2 scales was comparable. Overall, our results supported the reliability of the EHS, while SHSS:C scores were more inconsistent between the 2 assessments. More research is warranted.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

斯坦福催眠易感性量表、表格C和Elkins催眠易感性量表的重测信度。

本项目旨在评估斯坦福催眠敏感性量表:表格C (SHSS:C)和埃尔金斯催眠性量表(EHS)在重复评估中可催眠性的一致性，并对比这些量表的得分分布和愉快性。由不同的实验者分别对大学生进行两次SHSS:C或EHS测试，每隔一周进行一次。EHS和SHSS的重测信度为r s = 0.82(0.71 - 0.92)， r s =。66.95% (0.47 - 0.86) (Spearman相关)。EHS组的催眠能力在测试和重测时具有可比性，SHSS:C评分随重测而降低。我们发现SHSS:C比EHS产生更高的得分，并且两个量表的愉悦度具有可比性。总体而言，我们的结果支持EHS的可靠性，而SHSS:C评分在两种评估之间更不一致。需要进行更多的研究。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis Multiple-

CiteScore

3.70

自引率

29.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： The IJCEH will keep you up to date on the latest clinical and research findings in the field, thanks to leading scholars from around the world examining such topics as: •Hypnotherapeutic Techniques •Pain and Anxiety Relief •Disociative Identity Disorder (Multiple Personality Disorder) •Altered States of Consciousness •Delayed Recall •Dissociation •Forensic Uses of Hypnosis •Hypnosis in Eyewitness Memory •Hypnotic Induction in Dentistry •Hypnotizability •Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder •Self-Hypnosis •Control of Smoking •Weight Management •Ego State Hypnotherapy •Theories of Hypnosis •Physiological & Psychological Bases of Hypnosis