Foreign body reaction in vaginally eroded and noneroded polypropylene suburethral slings in the female: a case series.

Tilemachos Kavvadias, Daniel Kaemmer, Uwe Klinge, Stefanie Kuschel, Bernhard Schuessler
{"title":"Foreign body reaction in vaginally eroded and noneroded polypropylene suburethral slings in the female: a case series.","authors":"Tilemachos Kavvadias,&nbsp;Daniel Kaemmer,&nbsp;Uwe Klinge,&nbsp;Stefanie Kuschel,&nbsp;Bernhard Schuessler","doi":"10.1007/s00192-009-0974-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Aim of this study was to investigate the pattern of the foreign body reaction of macroporous polypropylene mesh (MPPM) used in females for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence and to compare this pattern between eroded and noneroded tapes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten explanted suburethral slings, five eroded and five noneroded, were examined immunohistochemically under light microscopy; the tissue reaction was compared between eroded and noneroded materials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eroded material showed a significantly higher accumulation of macrophages around the filaments of the mesh.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study comparing reaction around eroded and noneroded MPPMs and indicates a more intense tissue reaction around eroded mesh, when compared to noneroded material. More studies are needed to prove whether the detected foreign body reaction was the actual trigger for the erosion.</p>","PeriodicalId":73495,"journal":{"name":"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction","volume":"20 12","pages":"1473-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00192-009-0974-y","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0974-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2009/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Aim of this study was to investigate the pattern of the foreign body reaction of macroporous polypropylene mesh (MPPM) used in females for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence and to compare this pattern between eroded and noneroded tapes.

Methods: Ten explanted suburethral slings, five eroded and five noneroded, were examined immunohistochemically under light microscopy; the tissue reaction was compared between eroded and noneroded materials.

Results: Eroded material showed a significantly higher accumulation of macrophages around the filaments of the mesh.

Conclusions: This is the first study comparing reaction around eroded and noneroded MPPMs and indicates a more intense tissue reaction around eroded mesh, when compared to noneroded material. More studies are needed to prove whether the detected foreign body reaction was the actual trigger for the erosion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
女性阴道侵蚀和非侵蚀聚丙烯喉下吊索中的异物反应:一个病例系列。
前言和假设:本研究的目的是探讨大孔聚丙烯网(MPPM)用于治疗女性压力性尿失禁的异物反应模式,并比较侵蚀带和非侵蚀带的这种模式。方法:采用光镜下免疫组化方法对10个外植体进行免疫组化检测,其中5个被侵蚀,5个未被侵蚀;比较了侵蚀材料和非侵蚀材料的组织反应。结果:侵蚀材料显示巨噬细胞在网丝周围明显增多。结论:这是第一个比较侵蚀和未侵蚀mppm周围反应的研究,表明与未侵蚀材料相比,侵蚀网周围的组织反应更强烈。需要更多的研究来证明检测到的异物反应是否是侵蚀的实际触发因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Overactive bladder: a new paradigm. Case of longitudinal vaginal septum with pelvic organ prolapse. Fistulization between ectopic ureteral stump and uterus following nephroureterectomy: case report. Accidental introduction of a contraceptive vaginal ring into the urinary bladder. Vesical endometriosis following the menopause.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1