The usability of electronic personal health record systems for an underserved adult population.

IF 3.3 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Human Factors Pub Date : 2015-05-01 Epub Date: 2014-09-05 DOI:10.1177/0018720814549238
Sara J Czaja, Christina Zarcadoolas, Wendy L Vaughon, Chin Chin Lee, Maxine L Rockoff, Joslyn Levy
{"title":"The usability of electronic personal health record systems for an underserved adult population.","authors":"Sara J Czaja,&nbsp;Christina Zarcadoolas,&nbsp;Wendy L Vaughon,&nbsp;Chin Chin Lee,&nbsp;Maxine L Rockoff,&nbsp;Joslyn Levy","doi":"10.1177/0018720814549238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goals of this study were to identify the demands associated with using electronic personal health records (PHRs) and to evaluate the ability of adults of lower socioeconomic status and low health literacy to use PHRs to perform health management activities.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>PHRs are proliferating in clinical practices and health care organizations. These systems offer the potential of increasing the active involvement of patients in health self-management. However, little is known about the actual usability of these tools for health consumers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used task analysis and health literacy load analysis to identify the cognitive and literacy demands inherent in the use of PHRs and evaluated the usability of three currently available PHR systems with a sample of 54 adults. Participants used the systems to perform tasks related to medication management, interpretation of lab/test results, and health maintenance. Data were also gathered on the participants' perception of the potential value of using a PHR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicated that a majority of the participants had difficulty completing the tasks and needed assistance. There was some variability according to task and PHR system. However, most participants perceived the use of PHRs as valuable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although considered a valuable tool by consumers, the use of PHR systems may be challenging for many people. Strategies are needed to enhance the usability of these systems, especially for people with low literacy, low health literacy, or limited technology skills.</p><p><strong>Application: </strong>The data from this study have implications for the design of PHRs.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":"57 3","pages":"491-506"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0018720814549238","citationCount":"88","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814549238","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 88

Abstract

Objective: The goals of this study were to identify the demands associated with using electronic personal health records (PHRs) and to evaluate the ability of adults of lower socioeconomic status and low health literacy to use PHRs to perform health management activities.

Background: PHRs are proliferating in clinical practices and health care organizations. These systems offer the potential of increasing the active involvement of patients in health self-management. However, little is known about the actual usability of these tools for health consumers.

Method: We used task analysis and health literacy load analysis to identify the cognitive and literacy demands inherent in the use of PHRs and evaluated the usability of three currently available PHR systems with a sample of 54 adults. Participants used the systems to perform tasks related to medication management, interpretation of lab/test results, and health maintenance. Data were also gathered on the participants' perception of the potential value of using a PHR.

Results: The results indicated that a majority of the participants had difficulty completing the tasks and needed assistance. There was some variability according to task and PHR system. However, most participants perceived the use of PHRs as valuable.

Conclusions: Although considered a valuable tool by consumers, the use of PHR systems may be challenging for many people. Strategies are needed to enhance the usability of these systems, especially for people with low literacy, low health literacy, or limited technology skills.

Application: The data from this study have implications for the design of PHRs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子个人健康记录系统对服务不足的成年人的可用性。
目的:本研究的目的是确定与使用电子个人健康档案(PHRs)相关的需求,并评估低社会经济地位和低健康素养的成年人使用PHRs进行健康管理活动的能力。背景:phrr在临床实践和卫生保健组织中正在激增。这些系统提供了增加患者积极参与健康自我管理的潜力。然而,人们对这些工具对健康消费者的实际可用性知之甚少。方法:我们使用任务分析和健康素养负荷分析来确定使用医疗记录系统所固有的认知和素养需求,并以54名成年人为样本评估了三种现有医疗记录系统的可用性。参与者使用该系统执行与药物管理、实验室/测试结果解释和健康维护相关的任务。还收集了参与者对使用PHR的潜在价值的看法的数据。结果:结果表明,大多数参与者难以完成任务,需要帮助。根据任务和PHR系统的不同,存在一定的差异性。然而,大多数与会者认为使用phrr是有价值的。结论:尽管消费者认为PHR系统是一种有价值的工具,但对许多人来说,PHR系统的使用可能具有挑战性。需要制定战略来提高这些系统的可用性,特别是对识字率低、卫生知识水平低或技术技能有限的人。应用:本研究的数据对PHRs的设计有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human Factors
Human Factors 管理科学-行为科学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.
期刊最新文献
A Taxonomy for Understanding the Disuse of Technology by Older Adults: A Qualitative Analysis of Disuse of Smart Speakers. Passive Exoskeletons Reduce Low-Back Passive Tissue Creep. (Some) Benefits in Operator Decisions to Use AI After Experiencing Optimal Outcomes. Testing a Computational Model of Interruptions: The Effects of Time Pressure on Interruption and Response Decisions. Evaluating a New Road Sign and Traffic Markings for Motorcycle Safety on Untreated Roads.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1