Opposing View: A Blind Faith in Meta-Analyses in Academia Could Be a Threat to Public Health.

Q2 Medicine Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-15 DOI:10.12997/jla.2022.11.3.308
Jae Hyun Bae
{"title":"Opposing View: A Blind Faith in Meta-Analyses in Academia Could Be a Threat to Public Health.","authors":"Jae Hyun Bae","doi":"10.12997/jla.2022.11.3.308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"for all-cause mortality, 1.3% (95% CI, 0.9%–1.7%) for myocardial infarction, and 0.4% (95% CI, 0.2%–0.6%) for stroke in people who received statins compared with placebo or usual care. The relative risk reduction (RRR) was 9% (95% CI, 5%–14%), 29% (95% CI, 22%–34%), and 14% (95% CI, 5%–22%), respectively. These findings were consistent in primary prevention and secondary prevention populations. However, significant clinical and statistical heterogeneity was observed depending on the outcomes and study populations.","PeriodicalId":16284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis","volume":"11 3","pages":"308-313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/15/04/jla-11-308.PMC9515736.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12997/jla.2022.11.3.308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

for all-cause mortality, 1.3% (95% CI, 0.9%–1.7%) for myocardial infarction, and 0.4% (95% CI, 0.2%–0.6%) for stroke in people who received statins compared with placebo or usual care. The relative risk reduction (RRR) was 9% (95% CI, 5%–14%), 29% (95% CI, 22%–34%), and 14% (95% CI, 5%–22%), respectively. These findings were consistent in primary prevention and secondary prevention populations. However, significant clinical and statistical heterogeneity was observed depending on the outcomes and study populations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反对意见:学术界对元分析的盲目信仰可能对公共卫生构成威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis
Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Multiple Equations for Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Calculation Against the Direct Homogeneous Method. Emerging Circulating Biomarkers for Enhanced Cardiovascular Risk Prediction. Extracellular Vesicles as Mediators in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease. Mendelian Randomization Studies in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases. Nrf2 Connects Cellular Autophagy and Vascular Senescence in Atherosclerosis: A Mini-Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1