Assessment in Schizotypy: A Systematic Review Towards Clinical and Personality Models.

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Psychological Research Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.21500/20112084.5292
Cristhian Javier Rivera Tapia
{"title":"Assessment in Schizotypy: A Systematic Review Towards Clinical and Personality Models.","authors":"Cristhian Javier Rivera Tapia","doi":"10.21500/20112084.5292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>research carried out regarding the psychological concept of schizotypy responds to a field of extensive development since its conceptualization decades ago, which includes schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) and schizotypal personality disorder (SPD). However, controversies still persist marked by the difficulty of establishing definitive consensus.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>the research purpose aimed to synthesize the empirical evidence involved in the use of various methodologies and tools for understanding schizotypy.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A systematic review was carried out in the following databases: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Taylor and Francis, Wiley, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and PsycNet. By using the PRISMA guidelines, 65 studies published in the last decade (2010-2020) were discriminated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The synthesis of cumulative knowledge made it possible to define schizotypy as an integrating multidimensional construct and to identify valid assessment tools in use, in its psychometric, clinical, and personality characterizations.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusions: </strong>Clinical implications found in these reports are addressed, as well as notions of the continuum of psychoses, taxonomic, and multidimensional models.</p>","PeriodicalId":46542,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychological Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"84-97"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fd/20/2011-2084-ijpr-15-01-84.PMC9529290.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychological Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5292","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: research carried out regarding the psychological concept of schizotypy responds to a field of extensive development since its conceptualization decades ago, which includes schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) and schizotypal personality disorder (SPD). However, controversies still persist marked by the difficulty of establishing definitive consensus.

Objective: the research purpose aimed to synthesize the empirical evidence involved in the use of various methodologies and tools for understanding schizotypy.

Methodology: A systematic review was carried out in the following databases: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Taylor and Francis, Wiley, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and PsycNet. By using the PRISMA guidelines, 65 studies published in the last decade (2010-2020) were discriminated.

Results: The synthesis of cumulative knowledge made it possible to define schizotypy as an integrating multidimensional construct and to identify valid assessment tools in use, in its psychometric, clinical, and personality characterizations.

Discussion/conclusions: Clinical implications found in these reports are addressed, as well as notions of the continuum of psychoses, taxonomic, and multidimensional models.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神分裂型的评估:对临床和人格模型的系统回顾。
前言:关于精神分裂的心理学概念的研究回应了自其概念化几十年来广泛发展的领域,其中包括精神分裂症谱系障碍(SSD)和分裂型人格障碍(SPD)。然而,争论仍然存在,其特点是难以达成明确的协商一致意见。目的:本研究旨在综合运用各种方法和工具来理解精神分裂型所涉及的经验证据。方法:对以下数据库进行系统评价:Web of Science、Scopus、PubMed、Taylor and Francis、Wiley、Science Direct、Google Scholar和PsycNet。通过使用PRISMA指南,对过去十年(2010-2020年)发表的65项研究进行了区分。结果:累积知识的综合使得将分裂型定义为一个整合的多维结构成为可能,并在其心理测量学、临床和人格特征中确定有效的评估工具。讨论/结论:讨论了在这些报告中发现的临床意义,以及精神病连续体、分类学和多维模型的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Psychological Research
International Journal of Psychological Research PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychological Research (Int.j.psychol.res) is the Faculty of Psychology’s official publication of San Buenaventura University in Medellin, Colombia. Int.j.psychol.res relies on a vast and diverse theoretical and thematic publishing material, which includes unpublished productions of diverse psychological issues and behavioral human areas such as psychiatry, neurosciences, mental health, among others.
期刊最新文献
Voluntary Ethanol Intake and Anxiety Behavior in Wistar-Uis Rats. Gaslighting Exposure During Emerging Adulthood: Personality Traits and Vulnerability Paths. Validity and Internal Consistency of a Spanish Version of the Cognitive Flexibil ity Scale (CFS). Attitudes of the Host Population towards Syrian Refugees: A New Theoretical Perspective Translation of Well-being Assessment Instruments in African Contexts: A Mapping Review and Future Directions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1