Titration with automatic continuous positive airway pressure in obstructive sleep apnea

C. Dias , L. Sousa , L. Batata , R. Reis , F. Teixeira , J. Moita , J. Moutinho dos Santos
{"title":"Titration with automatic continuous positive airway pressure in obstructive sleep apnea","authors":"C. Dias ,&nbsp;L. Sousa ,&nbsp;L. Batata ,&nbsp;R. Reis ,&nbsp;F. Teixeira ,&nbsp;J. Moita ,&nbsp;J. Moutinho dos Santos","doi":"10.1016/j.rppnen.2017.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><p>Autotitrating positive airway pressure (APAP) is an accepted titration method to determine the optimal positive airway pressure (PAP), for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The required duration of APAP monitoring to determine a fixed continuous positive airway pressure level still remains to be established. We aimed to evaluate the variation in PAP level, delivered by APAP devices, at different periods of treatment, to determine the APAP treatment duration required to reach an effective and stable PAP level.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional study of 62 patients newly diagnosed with OSA were evaluated after 3 months of APAP therapy. APAP data corresponding to the first day (D1), first week (W1), seventh week (W7) and twelfth week (W12) under APAP therapy was collected. For the analysis of the pressure behaviour, the difference of P95th pressure level between W12 and W7 (P W12–W7), W12 and W1 (P W12–W1) and W12 and D1 (P W12–D1) was calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was a high correlation in P95th pressure level between D1 and W12 (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.771; <em>p</em> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->0.0001), W1 and W12 (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.817; <em>p</em> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->0.0001), and W7 and W12 (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.926; <em>p</em> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->0.0001). This correlation progressively increased with APAP use. A significance difference was found in concordance between P W12–W7 and P W12–D1 (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.046) within the pressure range ±2<!--> <!-->cmH<sub>2</sub>O. However there was no significant difference in concordance between P W12–W7 and P W12–W1.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>One week of APAP therapy seems sufficient to determine an effective and stable PAP level, within the pressure range ±2<!--> <!-->cmH<sub>2</sub>O.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101122,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia (English Edition)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rppnen.2017.04.002","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173511517300659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background and objective

Autotitrating positive airway pressure (APAP) is an accepted titration method to determine the optimal positive airway pressure (PAP), for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The required duration of APAP monitoring to determine a fixed continuous positive airway pressure level still remains to be established. We aimed to evaluate the variation in PAP level, delivered by APAP devices, at different periods of treatment, to determine the APAP treatment duration required to reach an effective and stable PAP level.

Methods

A cross-sectional study of 62 patients newly diagnosed with OSA were evaluated after 3 months of APAP therapy. APAP data corresponding to the first day (D1), first week (W1), seventh week (W7) and twelfth week (W12) under APAP therapy was collected. For the analysis of the pressure behaviour, the difference of P95th pressure level between W12 and W7 (P W12–W7), W12 and W1 (P W12–W1) and W12 and D1 (P W12–D1) was calculated.

Results

There was a high correlation in P95th pressure level between D1 and W12 (r = 0.771; p > 0.0001), W1 and W12 (r = 0.817; p > 0.0001), and W7 and W12 (r = 0.926; p > 0.0001). This correlation progressively increased with APAP use. A significance difference was found in concordance between P W12–W7 and P W12–D1 (p = 0.046) within the pressure range ±2 cmH2O. However there was no significant difference in concordance between P W12–W7 and P W12–W1.

Conclusions

One week of APAP therapy seems sufficient to determine an effective and stable PAP level, within the pressure range ±2 cmH2O.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自动持续气道正压滴定治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停
背景与目的自动滴定气道正压(APAP)是一种公认的确定最佳气道正压(PAP)的滴定方法,用于治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)。APAP监测确定固定持续气道正压水平所需的持续时间仍有待确定。我们的目的是评估APAP设备在不同治疗时期传递的PAP水平的变化,以确定达到有效和稳定的PAP水平所需的APAP治疗时间。方法对62例新诊断为OSA的患者在APAP治疗3个月后进行横断面研究。收集APAP治疗第1天(D1)、第1周(W1)、第7周(W7)、第12周(W12) APAP数据。为了分析压力行为,计算了W12与W7 (pw12 - W7)、W12与W1 (pw12 - W1)、W12与D1 (pw12 - D1)的p95压力水平差值。结果D1与W12患者p95血压水平高度相关(r = 0.771;p比;0.0001), W1和W12 (r = 0.817;p比;0.0001), W7和W12 (r = 0.926;p比;0.0001)。随着APAP的使用,这种相关性逐渐增加。在±2 cmH2O压力范围内,pw12 - w7与pw12 - d1的一致性有显著性差异(P = 0.046)。pw12 - w7与pw12 - w1的一致性无显著差异。结论1周的APAP治疗似乎足以确定有效和稳定的PAP水平,在压力范围±2 cmH2O。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The role of physiotherapy in patients undergoing pulmonary surgery for lung cancer. A literature review The reliability of short-term measurement of heart rate variability during spontaneous breathing in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Pemetrexed-induced organizing pneumonia in the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma Beneficial effects of pulmonary rehabilitation in adult asthma Idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) – A case study of a rare entity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1