Evaluation of a Streamlined Oncologist-Led BRCA Mutation Testing and Counseling Model for Patients With Ovarian Cancer.

IF 41.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Journal of Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2018-05-01 Epub Date: 2018-03-20 DOI:10.1200/JCO.2017.76.2781
Nicoletta Colombo, Gloria Huang, Giovanni Scambia, Eva Chalas, Sandro Pignata, James Fiorica, Linda Van Le, Sharad Ghamande, Santiago González-Santiago, Isabel Bover, Begoña Graña Suárez, Andrew Green, Philippe Huot-Marchand, Yann Bourhis, Sudeep Karve, Christopher Blakeley
{"title":"Evaluation of a Streamlined Oncologist-Led BRCA Mutation Testing and Counseling Model for Patients With Ovarian Cancer.","authors":"Nicoletta Colombo, Gloria Huang, Giovanni Scambia, Eva Chalas, Sandro Pignata, James Fiorica, Linda Van Le, Sharad Ghamande, Santiago González-Santiago, Isabel Bover, Begoña Graña Suárez, Andrew Green, Philippe Huot-Marchand, Yann Bourhis, Sudeep Karve, Christopher Blakeley","doi":"10.1200/JCO.2017.76.2781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose There is a growing demand for BRCA1/ 2 mutation ( BRCAm) testing in patients with ovarian cancer; however, the limited number of genetic counselors presents a potential barrier. To facilitate more widespread BRCAm testing in ovarian cancer, pretest counseling by the oncology team could shorten testing turnaround times and ease the pressure on genetic counselors. Patients and Methods The prospective, observational Evaluating a Streamlined Onco-genetic BRCA Testing and Counseling Model Among Patients With Ovarian Cancer (ENGAGE) study evaluated a streamlined, oncologist-led BRCAm testing pathway. The analysis population comprised 700 patients with ovarian cancer at 26 sites in the United States, Italy, and Spain. The primary objectives were to assess turnaround time and, using questionnaires, to evaluate stakeholder satisfaction (patients, oncologists, and geneticists or genetic counselors) with the oncologist-led BRCAm testing pathway. Results The median overall turnaround time was 9.1 weeks (range, 0.9 to 37.1 weeks), with median turnaround times in the United States, Italy, and Spain of 4.1 weeks (range, 0.9 to 37.1 weeks), 20.4 weeks (range, 2.9 to 35.4 weeks), and 12.0 weeks (range, 2.0 to 36.7 weeks), respectively. Patient satisfaction with the oncologist-led BRCAm testing pathway was high, with > 99% of patients expressing satisfaction with pre- and post- BRCAm test counseling. Oncologist satisfaction with the BRCAm testing pathway was also high, with > 80% agreeing that the process for performing BRCAm testing worked well and that counseling patients on BRCAm testing was an efficient use of their time. Oncologists expressed higher levels of satisfaction with the BRCAm testing pathway than did geneticists or genetic counselors. Conclusion The results of the ENGAGE study demonstrate that an oncologist-led BRCAm testing process is feasible in ovarian cancer. Development of local BRCAm testing guidelines similar to the one used in this study could allow faster treatment decisions and better use of resources in the management of patients with ovarian cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":"36 13","pages":"1300-1307"},"PeriodicalIF":41.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6804908/pdf/JCO.2017.76.2781.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.76.2781","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose There is a growing demand for BRCA1/ 2 mutation ( BRCAm) testing in patients with ovarian cancer; however, the limited number of genetic counselors presents a potential barrier. To facilitate more widespread BRCAm testing in ovarian cancer, pretest counseling by the oncology team could shorten testing turnaround times and ease the pressure on genetic counselors. Patients and Methods The prospective, observational Evaluating a Streamlined Onco-genetic BRCA Testing and Counseling Model Among Patients With Ovarian Cancer (ENGAGE) study evaluated a streamlined, oncologist-led BRCAm testing pathway. The analysis population comprised 700 patients with ovarian cancer at 26 sites in the United States, Italy, and Spain. The primary objectives were to assess turnaround time and, using questionnaires, to evaluate stakeholder satisfaction (patients, oncologists, and geneticists or genetic counselors) with the oncologist-led BRCAm testing pathway. Results The median overall turnaround time was 9.1 weeks (range, 0.9 to 37.1 weeks), with median turnaround times in the United States, Italy, and Spain of 4.1 weeks (range, 0.9 to 37.1 weeks), 20.4 weeks (range, 2.9 to 35.4 weeks), and 12.0 weeks (range, 2.0 to 36.7 weeks), respectively. Patient satisfaction with the oncologist-led BRCAm testing pathway was high, with > 99% of patients expressing satisfaction with pre- and post- BRCAm test counseling. Oncologist satisfaction with the BRCAm testing pathway was also high, with > 80% agreeing that the process for performing BRCAm testing worked well and that counseling patients on BRCAm testing was an efficient use of their time. Oncologists expressed higher levels of satisfaction with the BRCAm testing pathway than did geneticists or genetic counselors. Conclusion The results of the ENGAGE study demonstrate that an oncologist-led BRCAm testing process is feasible in ovarian cancer. Development of local BRCAm testing guidelines similar to the one used in this study could allow faster treatment decisions and better use of resources in the management of patients with ovarian cancer.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症患者简化的肿瘤导向BRCA突变检测和咨询模型的评价。
目的癌症患者对BRCA1/2突变(BRCAm)检测的需求越来越大;然而,基因咨询师的数量有限是一个潜在的障碍。为了促进在卵巢癌症中更广泛地进行BRCAm检测,肿瘤学团队的测试前咨询可以缩短检测周转时间,减轻遗传咨询师的压力。患者和方法在癌症患者中评估简化的癌基因BRCA检测和咨询模型(ENGAGE)的前瞻性、观察性研究评估了简化的、以肿瘤为导向的BRCAm检测途径。分析人群包括美国、意大利和西班牙26个地点的700名癌症卵巢癌患者。主要目标是评估周转时间,并使用问卷评估利益相关者(患者、肿瘤学家、遗传学家或遗传顾问)对肿瘤学家主导的BRCAm检测途径的满意度。结果中位总周转时间为9.1周(范围为0.9至37.1周),美国、意大利和西班牙的中位周转时间分别为4.1周(范围0.9至37.2周)、20.4周(范围2.9至35.4周)和12.0周(范围2.0至36.7周)。患者对肿瘤学家主导的BRCAm检测途径的满意度很高,99%以上的患者对BRCAm测试前和测试后的咨询表示满意。肿瘤学家对BRCAm检测途径的满意度也很高,超过80%的人同意进行BRCAm测试的过程效果良好,为患者提供BRCAm检查咨询是对时间的有效利用。肿瘤学家对BRCAm检测途径的满意度高于遗传学家或遗传顾问。结论ENGAGE研究结果表明,肿瘤导向的BRCAm检测方法在卵巢癌症中是可行的。制定与本研究中使用的类似的本地BRCAm检测指南,可以更快地做出治疗决定,更好地利用资源管理癌症患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Journal of Clinical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
8215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.
期刊最新文献
Hepatic Arterial Infusion Pump Chemotherapy in Patients With Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma-PUMP-2 Trial. North Star. NCI9673 (Part B): ETCTN Randomized Phase II Study of Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab in Refractory, Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal. Good Oncologist: Doctoring Lessons From the Art of Oncology. Long-Term Prospective Cohort Study of Cervical Cancer Screening Using Triage of Women who Are Human Papillomavirus-Positive With Dual Stain and Human Papillomavirus Genotyping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1