Key factors to consider when measuring multimorbidity: Results from an expert panel and online survey.

Journal of comorbidity Pub Date : 2018-09-03 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2235042X18795306
Lauren E Griffith, Andrea Gruneir, Kathryn A Fisher, Kathryn Nicholson, Dilzayn Panjwani, Christopher Patterson, Maureen Markle-Reid, Jenny Ploeg, Arlene S Bierman, David B Hogan, Ross Upshur
{"title":"Key factors to consider when measuring multimorbidity: Results from an expert panel and online survey.","authors":"Lauren E Griffith,&nbsp;Andrea Gruneir,&nbsp;Kathryn A Fisher,&nbsp;Kathryn Nicholson,&nbsp;Dilzayn Panjwani,&nbsp;Christopher Patterson,&nbsp;Maureen Markle-Reid,&nbsp;Jenny Ploeg,&nbsp;Arlene S Bierman,&nbsp;David B Hogan,&nbsp;Ross Upshur","doi":"10.1177/2235042X18795306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are multiple multimorbidity measures but little consensus on which measures are most appropriate for different circumstances.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To share insights gained from discussions with experts in the fields of ageing research and multimorbidity on key factors to consider when measuring multimorbidity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Descriptive study of expert opinions on multimorbidity measures, informed by literature to identify available measures followed by a face-to-face meeting and an online survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The expert group included clinicians, researchers and policymakers in Canada with expertise in the fields of multimorbidity and ageing. Of the 30 experts invited, 15 (50%) attended the in-person meeting and 14 (47%) responded to the subsequent online survey. Experts agreed that there is no single multimorbidity measure that is suitable for all research studies. They cited a number of factors that need to be considered in selecting a measure for use in a research study including: (1) fit with the study purpose; (2) the conditions included in multimorbidity measures; (3) the role of episodic conditions or diseases; and (4) the role of social factors and other concepts missing in existing approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The suitability of existing multimorbidity measures for use in a specific research study depends on factors such as the purpose of the study, outcomes examined and preferences of the involved stakeholders. The results of this study suggest that there are areas that require further building out in both the conceptualization and measurement of multimorbidity for the benefit of future clinical, research and policy decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":92071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comorbidity","volume":"8 1","pages":"2235042X18795306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2235042X18795306","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comorbidity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2235042X18795306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Background: There are multiple multimorbidity measures but little consensus on which measures are most appropriate for different circumstances.

Objective: To share insights gained from discussions with experts in the fields of ageing research and multimorbidity on key factors to consider when measuring multimorbidity.

Design: Descriptive study of expert opinions on multimorbidity measures, informed by literature to identify available measures followed by a face-to-face meeting and an online survey.

Results: The expert group included clinicians, researchers and policymakers in Canada with expertise in the fields of multimorbidity and ageing. Of the 30 experts invited, 15 (50%) attended the in-person meeting and 14 (47%) responded to the subsequent online survey. Experts agreed that there is no single multimorbidity measure that is suitable for all research studies. They cited a number of factors that need to be considered in selecting a measure for use in a research study including: (1) fit with the study purpose; (2) the conditions included in multimorbidity measures; (3) the role of episodic conditions or diseases; and (4) the role of social factors and other concepts missing in existing approaches.

Conclusions: The suitability of existing multimorbidity measures for use in a specific research study depends on factors such as the purpose of the study, outcomes examined and preferences of the involved stakeholders. The results of this study suggest that there are areas that require further building out in both the conceptualization and measurement of multimorbidity for the benefit of future clinical, research and policy decisions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衡量多重发病率时要考虑的关键因素:来自专家小组和在线调查的结果。
背景:有多种多发病措施,但很少有共识的措施是最适合于不同的情况。目的:通过与老龄化研究和多病领域的专家讨论,分享在测量多病时应考虑的关键因素的见解。设计:描述性研究专家对多重疾病措施的意见,通过文献来确定可用的措施,然后进行面对面会议和在线调查。结果:专家组包括加拿大的临床医生、研究人员和政策制定者,他们在多病和老龄化领域具有专业知识。在受邀的30位专家中,15位(50%)参加了面对面的会议,14位(47%)回应了随后的在线调查。专家们一致认为,不存在适用于所有研究的单一多发病指标。他们列举了在选择用于研究的测量方法时需要考虑的一些因素,包括:(1)符合研究目的;(2)多病措施包括的条件;(3)偶发状况或疾病的作用;(4)社会因素的作用和现有方法中缺失的其他概念。结论:现有多病测量方法在特定研究中的适用性取决于研究目的、检查结果和相关利益相关者的偏好等因素。这项研究的结果表明,为了未来的临床、研究和政策决策,在多病的概念化和测量方面还有一些领域需要进一步建立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Experiences of older primary care patients with multimorbidity and their caregivers in navigating the healthcare system: A qualitative study protocol. Bi-directional association between depression and HF: An electronic health records-based cohort study. The association between clusters of chronic conditions and psychological well-being in younger and older people-A cross-sectional, population-based study from the Lolland-Falster Health Study, Denmark. The complexity of caregiving for community-living older adults with multiple chronic conditions: A qualitative study. Synergistic effects of hip/knee osteoarthritis and comorbidities on mobility and self-care limitations among older adults: Cross-sectional analysis of the Oxford pain, Activity and Lifestyle study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1