[DIFFERENCES IN SEXUAL NEGOTIATION STYLES AND SEXUAL SELF-EFFICACY IN USE OF CONDOM IN UNIVERSITY MEN AND WOMAN OF QUERETARO, MEXICO, 2018].

Jorge Raúl Palacios-Delgado, Nuria Ortego-García
{"title":"[DIFFERENCES IN SEXUAL NEGOTIATION STYLES AND SEXUAL SELF-EFFICACY IN USE OF CONDOM IN UNIVERSITY MEN AND WOMAN OF QUERETARO, MEXICO, 2018].","authors":"Jorge Raúl Palacios-Delgado,&nbsp;Nuria Ortego-García","doi":"10.18597/rcog.3327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare sexual negotiation levels and self-efficacy in male condom use in men and women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Comparative crosssectional study of undergraduate students carried out during the year 2018 in a private university in the city of Querétaro, Mexico. Non-probabilistic sampling was used. Measured variables included sociodemographic characteristics, risky sexual behaviors, negotiation skills and sexual self-efficacy for condom use. The Mann Whitney U test and non-parametric variance analysis (Kruskal - Wallis) were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 270 students were enrolled; 89.6% of university students were sexually active; the mean age of sexual activity initiation was 15.41 years. The average reported number of sexual partners was 4.2. In each sexual relation, 27.8% had used a condom. Differences were found between men and women in terms of sexual negotiation styles in the avoidance (p=0.04) and accommodation (p<0.00) domains, with higher scores for men compared to women. Women scored higher for self-efficacy in condom use (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The young university students interviewed engage in risky sexual activities. Women exhibit greater sexual self-efficacy as well as better skills at negotiating condom use. Strengthening public policies targeted to the student population for the prevention of risky sexual behavior is needed. Further studies on interventions aimed at building strong sexual negotiation and self-efficacy among adolescents are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":35675,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.3327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Objective: To compare sexual negotiation levels and self-efficacy in male condom use in men and women.

Methods: Comparative crosssectional study of undergraduate students carried out during the year 2018 in a private university in the city of Querétaro, Mexico. Non-probabilistic sampling was used. Measured variables included sociodemographic characteristics, risky sexual behaviors, negotiation skills and sexual self-efficacy for condom use. The Mann Whitney U test and non-parametric variance analysis (Kruskal - Wallis) were used.

Results: Overall, 270 students were enrolled; 89.6% of university students were sexually active; the mean age of sexual activity initiation was 15.41 years. The average reported number of sexual partners was 4.2. In each sexual relation, 27.8% had used a condom. Differences were found between men and women in terms of sexual negotiation styles in the avoidance (p=0.04) and accommodation (p<0.00) domains, with higher scores for men compared to women. Women scored higher for self-efficacy in condom use (p<0.001).

Conclusions: The young university students interviewed engage in risky sexual activities. Women exhibit greater sexual self-efficacy as well as better skills at negotiating condom use. Strengthening public policies targeted to the student population for the prevention of risky sexual behavior is needed. Further studies on interventions aimed at building strong sexual negotiation and self-efficacy among adolescents are required.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[墨西哥克雷塔罗大学男女大学生性谈判风格和性自我效能的差异,2018]。
目的:比较男女在使用男用避孕套过程中的性谈判水平和自我效能感。方法:对2018年墨西哥queremastaro市一所私立大学的本科生进行比较横断面研究。采用非概率抽样。测量的变量包括社会人口学特征、危险性行为、谈判技巧和使用避孕套的性自我效能。采用Mann Whitney U检验和非参数方差分析(Kruskal - Wallis)。结果:总共招收了270名学生;89.6%的大学生性活跃;开始性行为的平均年龄为15.41岁。报告的性伴侣平均数量为4.2。在每一次性关系中,27.8%的人使用过避孕套。在性谈判方式方面,男女在回避性行为和迁就性行为方面存在差异(p=0.04)。结论:受访青年大学生存在危险性行为。女性表现出更强的性自我效能感,在协商使用避孕套方面也有更好的技巧。需要加强针对学生群体的公共政策,以预防危险的性行为。需要进一步研究旨在在青少年中建立强有力的性谈判和自我效能的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia
Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología was founded in January 1949. It is the Federación Colombiana de Asociaciones de Obstetricia y Ginecología"s official periodic publication (formerly known as the Sociedad Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología). It is published quarterly and the following abbreviation should be used when citing the journal: Rev. Colomb. Obstet. Ginecol. The publication is authorized by Mingobierno resolution 218/1950.
期刊最新文献
Treatment of ectopic pregnancy implanted on cesarea scar: cohort study 2018-2022, Lima, Peru Risk factors associated with the need for insulin in patients with gestational diabetes in a reference hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina: retrospective cohort study Tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in molecular breast cancer subtypes in Medellin, Colombia. Retrospective cohort study Thoughts about the teaching role in health education Management of postpartum hemorrhage in a patient with bicornuate uterus using the B-Lynch suture. Case report and review of the literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1