Importance of Routine Laboratory Investigations Before Elective Surgery.

Ashish K Kannaujia, Amrita Gupta, Shiva Verma, Uma Srivastava, Rudrashish Haldar, Soni Jasuja
{"title":"Importance of Routine Laboratory Investigations Before Elective Surgery.","authors":"Ashish K Kannaujia, Amrita Gupta, Shiva Verma, Uma Srivastava, Rudrashish Haldar, Soni Jasuja","doi":"10.15190/d.2020.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong> Certain routine pre-operative laboratory investigations are performed in all patients before elective surgeries. We conducted this study to assess the value of routine pre-operative tests in the ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) Grade I and II adults undergoing elective surgery and their influence in the conduct of anaesthesia together with the costs incurred on unwarranted tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1271 patients posted for elective surgery under anaesthesia were recruited. Each patient attended the Pre-Anaesthetic Checkup Clinic and underwent clinical evaluation and investigations according to institutional policy. Demographic data and other characteristics were recorded, along with the results of laboratory test, any peri-operative intervention done as a result of abnormality and the cost incurred on tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Majority of the patients belonged to ASA status I (74%) and underwent moderately invasive surgery (78%). The total number of routine investigations performed was 8015. Of these, 351 (4.37%) tests had abnormal results. Amongst these 333 (4.15%) abnormalities were suspected clinically and peri-operative intervention was only performed in 0.43% of patients. Anemia was the most common abnormal finding. Abnormal blood glucose was detected in 6 patients who were not clinically suspected. Abnormal electrocardiograph (ECG) was found in 54 patients. However, the intervention was required only in 13 patients. No intervention was required because of abnormal findings of the chest X-Ray. In total cost of investigations, only 6.9% was contributed by abnormal investigations and the rest was spent on the normal tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incidence of tests with abnormal results was very low in our study, and less than 1% of the patients with abnormal tests required changes in their peri-anaesthetic management. No major complications were seen in any patient with normal or abnormal test results. Most of the expenses (93%) were related to the normal test, which did not contribute to the perioperative management, safety and outcome of the patient. Thus, pre-operative investigations should be judiciously advised to avoid inconvenience, surgical delays and escalation of the costs of surgical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":72829,"journal":{"name":"Discoveries (Craiova, Romania)","volume":"8 3","pages":"e114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7557155/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discoveries (Craiova, Romania)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15190/d.2020.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims:  Certain routine pre-operative laboratory investigations are performed in all patients before elective surgeries. We conducted this study to assess the value of routine pre-operative tests in the ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) Grade I and II adults undergoing elective surgery and their influence in the conduct of anaesthesia together with the costs incurred on unwarranted tests.

Methods: A total of 1271 patients posted for elective surgery under anaesthesia were recruited. Each patient attended the Pre-Anaesthetic Checkup Clinic and underwent clinical evaluation and investigations according to institutional policy. Demographic data and other characteristics were recorded, along with the results of laboratory test, any peri-operative intervention done as a result of abnormality and the cost incurred on tests.

Results: Majority of the patients belonged to ASA status I (74%) and underwent moderately invasive surgery (78%). The total number of routine investigations performed was 8015. Of these, 351 (4.37%) tests had abnormal results. Amongst these 333 (4.15%) abnormalities were suspected clinically and peri-operative intervention was only performed in 0.43% of patients. Anemia was the most common abnormal finding. Abnormal blood glucose was detected in 6 patients who were not clinically suspected. Abnormal electrocardiograph (ECG) was found in 54 patients. However, the intervention was required only in 13 patients. No intervention was required because of abnormal findings of the chest X-Ray. In total cost of investigations, only 6.9% was contributed by abnormal investigations and the rest was spent on the normal tests.

Conclusion: The incidence of tests with abnormal results was very low in our study, and less than 1% of the patients with abnormal tests required changes in their peri-anaesthetic management. No major complications were seen in any patient with normal or abnormal test results. Most of the expenses (93%) were related to the normal test, which did not contribute to the perioperative management, safety and outcome of the patient. Thus, pre-operative investigations should be judiciously advised to avoid inconvenience, surgical delays and escalation of the costs of surgical care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
择期手术前常规实验室检查的重要性。
背景和目的: 所有患者在择期手术前都要进行某些常规术前实验室检查。我们进行了这项研究,以评估对接受择期手术的 ASA(美国麻醉医师协会)I 级和 II 级成人进行常规术前检查的价值及其对麻醉实施的影响,以及因不必要的检查而产生的费用:共招募了 1271 名在麻醉状态下接受择期手术的患者。每位患者都在麻醉前检查门诊就诊,并根据机构政策接受临床评估和检查。人口统计学数据和其他特征、实验室检查结果、因异常情况而进行的围手术期干预以及检查费用均被记录在案:大多数患者的 ASA 状态为 I(74%),接受了中度创伤性手术(78%)。共进行了 8015 次常规检查。其中,351 项(4.37%)检查结果异常。其中 333 项(4.15%)异常是临床怀疑,仅有 0.43% 的患者进行了围手术期干预。贫血是最常见的异常结果。有 6 名患者的血糖异常未被临床怀疑。54 名患者的心电图出现异常。但只有 13 名患者需要进行干预。没有人因为胸部 X 光检查发现异常而需要干预。在检查总费用中,异常检查仅占 6.9%,其余均用于正常检查:结论:在我们的研究中,检查结果异常的发生率非常低,只有不到 1%的检查结果异常患者需要在麻醉前改变治疗方案。检查结果正常或异常的患者均未出现重大并发症。大部分费用(93%)与正常检查有关,对患者的围手术期管理、安全和结果无益。因此,应明智地建议进行术前检查,以避免造成不便、手术延误和手术护理费用增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Dementia on Patients with Hip Fracture. Atrial Bigeminy, a Potential Diagnostic Clue for Glioblastoma. Mammary Myofibroblastoma - An Elusive Cause of Breast Lump. Roles of molecular neuroimaging techniques in Parkinsonism. Role of C-reactive protein in disease progression, diagnosis and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1