Responsibility Considerations and the Design of Health Care Policies: A Survey Study of the Norwegian Population.

IF 1.3 4区 哲学 Q3 ETHICS Hec Forum Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2020-11-29 DOI:10.1007/s10730-020-09430-8
Cornelius Cappelen, Tor Midtbø, Kristine Bærøe
{"title":"Responsibility Considerations and the Design of Health Care Policies: A Survey Study of the Norwegian Population.","authors":"Cornelius Cappelen,&nbsp;Tor Midtbø,&nbsp;Kristine Bærøe","doi":"10.1007/s10730-020-09430-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this article is to explore people's attitudes toward responsibility in the allocation of public health care resources. Special attention is paid to conceptualizations of responsibility involving blame and sanctions. A representative sample of the Norwegian population was asked about various responsibility mechanisms that have been proposed in the theoretical literature on health care and personal responsibility, from denial of treatment to a tax on unhealthy consumer goods. Survey experiments were employed to study treatment effects, such as whether fairness considerations affect attitudes about responsibility. We find that, overall, a substantial minority of the respondents find it fair to let the health care system sanction people-in one way or another-for voluntary behaviors that increase the risk of becoming ill. Quite surprisingly, we find that people are more prone to report that they should themselves be held responsible for unhealthy lifestyles than others.</p>","PeriodicalId":46160,"journal":{"name":"Hec Forum","volume":"34 2","pages":"115-138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10730-020-09430-8","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hec Forum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-020-09430-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The objective of this article is to explore people's attitudes toward responsibility in the allocation of public health care resources. Special attention is paid to conceptualizations of responsibility involving blame and sanctions. A representative sample of the Norwegian population was asked about various responsibility mechanisms that have been proposed in the theoretical literature on health care and personal responsibility, from denial of treatment to a tax on unhealthy consumer goods. Survey experiments were employed to study treatment effects, such as whether fairness considerations affect attitudes about responsibility. We find that, overall, a substantial minority of the respondents find it fair to let the health care system sanction people-in one way or another-for voluntary behaviors that increase the risk of becoming ill. Quite surprisingly, we find that people are more prone to report that they should themselves be held responsible for unhealthy lifestyles than others.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
责任考虑和卫生保健政策的设计:挪威人口调查研究。
本文的目的是探讨人们在公共卫生资源分配中的责任态度。特别注意涉及责备和制裁的责任概念。向挪威人口中的一个代表性样本询问了关于保健和个人责任的理论文献中提出的各种责任机制,从拒绝治疗到对不健康消费品征税。采用调查实验研究治疗效果,如公平考虑是否影响责任态度。我们发现,总体而言,相当一部分受访者认为,让医疗保健系统以这样或那样的方式制裁那些增加患病风险的自愿行为是公平的。令人惊讶的是,我们发现人们更倾向于认为自己应该为不健康的生活方式负责,而不是其他人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hec Forum
Hec Forum ETHICS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: HEC Forum is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to practicing physicians, nurses, social workers, risk managers, attorneys, ethicists, and other HEC committee members. Contributions are welcomed from any pertinent source, but the text should be written to be appreciated by HEC members and lay readers. HEC Forum publishes essays, research papers, and features the following sections:Essays on Substantive Bioethical/Health Law Issues Analyses of Procedural or Operational Committee Issues Document Exchange Special Articles International Perspectives Mt./St. Anonymous: Cases and Institutional Policies Point/Counterpoint Argumentation Case Reviews, Analyses, and Resolutions Chairperson''s Section `Tough Spot'' Critical Annotations Health Law Alert Network News Letters to the Editors
期刊最新文献
What's Left of Moral Bioenhancement? Reviewing a 15-Year Debate. Surrogate Wars: The "Best Interest Values" Hierarchy & End-of-Life Conflicts with Surrogate Decision-Makers. Medical Assistance in Dying, Slippery Slopes, and Availability of Care: A Reply to Koch. Creating Barriers to Healthcare and Advance Care Planning by Requiring Hospitals to Ask Patients About Their Immigration Status. Medical-Legal Partnerships and Prevention: Caring for Unrepresented Patients Through Early Identification and Intervention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1