Hand preference for unimanual and bimanual tasks: Evidence from questionnaires and preferential reaching.

IF 0.9 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Laterality Pub Date : 2022-05-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-17 DOI:10.1080/1357650X.2021.1990313
Danielle Salters, Sara M Scharoun Benson
{"title":"Hand preference for unimanual and bimanual tasks: Evidence from questionnaires and preferential reaching.","authors":"Danielle Salters,&nbsp;Sara M Scharoun Benson","doi":"10.1080/1357650X.2021.1990313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current research compared hand selection in a preferential reaching paradigm with unimanual (i.e., pick-up cup) and bimanual (pick-up cup and pour from pitcher) tasks. In addition, relationships between self-report, questionnaire-based hand preference (unimanual and bimanual) and patterns of hand selection were assessed. Data offer support for a division of labour between the hands in at the midline; however, bimanual selection otherwise reflects consideration of object proximity (i.e., location) and comfort (i.e., biomechanical constraints). When grasping cups in right space, the right-hand was used to stabilize the cup and left-hand to mobilize the pitcher, whereas the opposite pattern was observed in left-space. Unimanual hand selection was also driven by object location. Subsequent analyses revealed a relationship between unimanual measures, but not bimanual measures of hand preference. Overall, findings support the notion that questionnaire data are associated with hand preference for grasping to a certain extent; however, use of a comprehensive battery of assessments is recommended when assessing and/or predicting handedness.</p>","PeriodicalId":47387,"journal":{"name":"Laterality","volume":"27 3","pages":"308-323"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laterality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2021.1990313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The current research compared hand selection in a preferential reaching paradigm with unimanual (i.e., pick-up cup) and bimanual (pick-up cup and pour from pitcher) tasks. In addition, relationships between self-report, questionnaire-based hand preference (unimanual and bimanual) and patterns of hand selection were assessed. Data offer support for a division of labour between the hands in at the midline; however, bimanual selection otherwise reflects consideration of object proximity (i.e., location) and comfort (i.e., biomechanical constraints). When grasping cups in right space, the right-hand was used to stabilize the cup and left-hand to mobilize the pitcher, whereas the opposite pattern was observed in left-space. Unimanual hand selection was also driven by object location. Subsequent analyses revealed a relationship between unimanual measures, but not bimanual measures of hand preference. Overall, findings support the notion that questionnaire data are associated with hand preference for grasping to a certain extent; however, use of a comprehensive battery of assessments is recommended when assessing and/or predicting handedness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手工和手工任务的手偏好:来自问卷调查和优先到达的证据。
目前的研究比较了优先到达范式中的手选择与单手(即拿杯)和双手(拿杯和倒杯)任务。此外,我们还评估了自我报告、基于问卷的手偏好(单手和双手)和手选择模式之间的关系。数据支持中线工人之间的劳动分工;然而,手动选择则反映了对物体接近性(即位置)和舒适性(即生物力学约束)的考虑。当在右侧空间抓杯子时,右手用来固定杯子,左手用来移动投手,而在左侧空间观察到相反的模式。单手选择也是由对象位置驱动的。随后的分析揭示了单手测量之间的关系,而不是双手测量的手偏好。总体而言,研究结果在一定程度上支持了问卷数据与手抓偏好相关的观点;然而,在评估和/或预测利手性时,建议使用全面的评估方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Laterality
Laterality Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition publishes high quality research on all aspects of lateralisation in humans and non-human species. Laterality"s principal interest is in the psychological, behavioural and neurological correlates of lateralisation. The editors will also consider accessible papers from any discipline which can illuminate the general problems of the evolution of biological and neural asymmetry, papers on the cultural, linguistic, artistic and social consequences of lateral asymmetry, and papers on its historical origins and development. The interests of workers in laterality are typically broad.
期刊最新文献
Dichotic listening with syllables: Effects of forced attention. Do bodybuilders pose symmetrically? Lateral bias analysis in mandatory poses of Mr. Olympia Classic Physique athletes. Artistic turns: laterality in paintings of kisses and embraces Footedness in merlins: Raptors perching in a cold climate. Fear is more right lateralized than happiness and anger: Evidence for the motivational hypothesis of emotional face perception?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1