Evaluation of Elastomeric Impression Materials' Hydrophilicity: An in vitro Study.

IF 1.4 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Acta Stomatologica Croatica Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.15644/asc55/3/3
Anna Theocharidou, Konstantinos Tzimas, Kosmas Tolidis, Dimitrios Tortopidis
{"title":"Evaluation of Elastomeric Impression Materials' Hydrophilicity: An <i>in vitro</i> Study.","authors":"Anna Theocharidou,&nbsp;Konstantinos Tzimas,&nbsp;Kosmas Tolidis,&nbsp;Dimitrios Tortopidis","doi":"10.15644/asc55/3/3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hydrophilicity of dental impression materials is crucial for obtaining an accurate impression and necessary for the production of a well-fitting cast restoration. The most common technique for evaluation of hydrophilicity is a contact angle measurement. The aim of the present <i>in vitro</i> study was to compare the water contact angles of four groups of elastomeric impression materials, before and during setting.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Flattened specimens (n=10) of tested impression materials were prepared by the use of a Teflon mold with specific dimensions. A 5μl droplet of deionized water fell on the specimen, and photos were taken using a Nikon D3200 DSLR camera and a 105 mm macro lens (Nikorr, Nikon) in specific time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CAD/CAM material showed the highest contact angle measurements. The light body polyvinylsiloxane (PVS) material 1, polyether and vinylsiloxanether material showed comparable contact angle measurements especially at the initial time point. A statistically significant reduction of contact angles was reported during setup time for all PVS, PE and vinylsiloxanether materials, while the most expressed reduction of contact angle measurements, and thus the most significant increase of hydrophilicity were reported for light wash PVS material 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CAD/CAM impression material showed the most hydrophobic behavior. PVS materials showed excellent hydrophilicity. Polyether and polyvinyloxanether impression materials presented lower contact angle measurements, and thus superior hydrophilicity, compared with other tested materials initially and during setting. All tested impression materials presented a stepwise development of hydrophilicity during the setting stage.</p>","PeriodicalId":7154,"journal":{"name":"Acta Stomatologica Croatica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/84/83/ASC_55(3)_256-263.PMC8514227.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Stomatologica Croatica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15644/asc55/3/3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Hydrophilicity of dental impression materials is crucial for obtaining an accurate impression and necessary for the production of a well-fitting cast restoration. The most common technique for evaluation of hydrophilicity is a contact angle measurement. The aim of the present in vitro study was to compare the water contact angles of four groups of elastomeric impression materials, before and during setting.

Material and methods: Flattened specimens (n=10) of tested impression materials were prepared by the use of a Teflon mold with specific dimensions. A 5μl droplet of deionized water fell on the specimen, and photos were taken using a Nikon D3200 DSLR camera and a 105 mm macro lens (Nikorr, Nikon) in specific time points.

Results: The CAD/CAM material showed the highest contact angle measurements. The light body polyvinylsiloxane (PVS) material 1, polyether and vinylsiloxanether material showed comparable contact angle measurements especially at the initial time point. A statistically significant reduction of contact angles was reported during setup time for all PVS, PE and vinylsiloxanether materials, while the most expressed reduction of contact angle measurements, and thus the most significant increase of hydrophilicity were reported for light wash PVS material 2.

Conclusions: The CAD/CAM impression material showed the most hydrophobic behavior. PVS materials showed excellent hydrophilicity. Polyether and polyvinyloxanether impression materials presented lower contact angle measurements, and thus superior hydrophilicity, compared with other tested materials initially and during setting. All tested impression materials presented a stepwise development of hydrophilicity during the setting stage.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弹性体印模材料的亲水性评价:体外研究。
简介:牙印模材料的亲水性对于获得准确的印模至关重要,并且对于生产合适的铸造修复是必要的。评价亲水性最常用的技术是测量接触角。本体外研究的目的是比较四组弹性印模材料在成型前和成型过程中的水接触角。材料与方法:使用特定尺寸的特氟龙模具,制备了测试压模材料的扁平试样(n=10)。取5μl的去离子水滴在样品上,使用尼康D3200单反相机和105 mm微距镜头(Nikorr, Nikon)在特定时间点拍摄照片。结果:CAD/CAM材料的接触角测量值最高。轻体聚乙烯硅氧烷(PVS)材料1、聚醚和乙烯硅氧烷材料的接触角测量值具有可比性,特别是在初始时间点。在所有PVS、PE和乙烯基硅氧烷材料的设置时间内,接触角的减少在统计上是显著的,而接触角测量的减少最明显,因此亲水性的增加最显著的是轻洗PVS材料2。结论:CAD/CAM印模材料表现出最明显的疏水性。PVS材料具有优异的亲水性。与其他测试材料相比,聚醚和聚乙烯醇印模材料在初始和固化过程中具有更低的接触角测量值,因此具有更好的亲水性。所有测试的压印材料在凝固阶段都呈现出亲水性的逐步发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Stomatologica Croatica
Acta Stomatologica Croatica DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
28.60%
发文量
32
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Acta Stomatologica Croatica (ASCRO) is a leading scientific non-profit journal in the field of dental, oral and cranio-facial sciences during the past 44 years in Croatia. ASCRO publishes original scientific and clinical papers, preliminary communications, case reports, book reviews, letters to the editor and news. Review articles are published by invitation from the Editor-in-Chief by acclaimed professionals in distinct fields of dental medicine. All manuscripts are subjected to peer review process.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Tooth Shade Measurement Precision and Consistency with Digital Photography Calibration System. Clinical Survival of Reduced-Thickness Monolithic Lithium-Disilicate Crowns: A 3-Year Randomized Controlled Trial. Dental Anxiety Among Students of the University of Rijeka, Croatia. Evaluation of Sella Turcica Variations in Lateral Cephalometric Radiographs and its Association with Malocclusion. Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis of Resin and Calcium Silicate Based Sealers Removal in Mandibular Molars Curved Canals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1