Clinical Study of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) for Lower Extremity Venous Ulcers: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-19 DOI:10.1177/15347346211046203
Qiangwei Fang, Yufan Zhang, Lijun Tang, Xiaomei Li, Xiaowei Zhang, Junjun Jin Gang, Gang Xu
{"title":"Clinical Study of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) for Lower Extremity Venous Ulcers: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.","authors":"Qiangwei Fang,&nbsp;Yufan Zhang,&nbsp;Lijun Tang,&nbsp;Xiaomei Li,&nbsp;Xiaowei Zhang,&nbsp;Junjun Jin Gang,&nbsp;Gang Xu","doi":"10.1177/15347346211046203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To systematically evaluate the clinical effects of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of lower limb venous ulcers by applying a meta-analysis method. The Pubmed, Cochrance Library, Embase, and OVID EBM Reviews databases were searched for the search terms'platelet-rich plasma\" or \"Plasma, Platelet-Rich\" or \"Platelet Rich Plasma\" and \"lower extremity venous ulcers' or \"Leg Ulcers' or \"Ulcer, Leg\", and a meta-analysis was performed on the published research literature on platelet-rich plasma for lower extremity venous ulcers from January 1900 to April 2021. The outcome indicators were: post-treatment trauma area and healing rate. Revman 5.3 statistical software was applied for meta-analysis. A total of 294 patients with lower extremity venous ulcers were included in six publications, including 148 patients in the experimental group treated with PRP versus 146 patients in the control group treated with conventional therapy. There was a statistically significant difference in the Formula of an ellipse at the end of treatment (CM²) between the experimental group and the control group, with a mean difference of -1.19 (95% CI -1.80 to -0.58, <i>P</i> = .0001; 6 studies, 294 participants moderate quality of evidence). The difference between the healing rate of the experimental group and the control group was statistically significant, with a risk ratio (RR) of 5.73 (95% CI 3.29 - 9.99, <i>P</i> < .00001; 5 studies, 248 participants moderate quality of evidence).There may be publication bias for both Formula of an ellipse at the end of treatment and healing rate. This comprehensive meta-analysis of available evidence suggests that the application of PRP for lower extremity venous ulcers accelerates the wound healing process and improves wound healing rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":49181,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346211046203","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

To systematically evaluate the clinical effects of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of lower limb venous ulcers by applying a meta-analysis method. The Pubmed, Cochrance Library, Embase, and OVID EBM Reviews databases were searched for the search terms'platelet-rich plasma" or "Plasma, Platelet-Rich" or "Platelet Rich Plasma" and "lower extremity venous ulcers' or "Leg Ulcers' or "Ulcer, Leg", and a meta-analysis was performed on the published research literature on platelet-rich plasma for lower extremity venous ulcers from January 1900 to April 2021. The outcome indicators were: post-treatment trauma area and healing rate. Revman 5.3 statistical software was applied for meta-analysis. A total of 294 patients with lower extremity venous ulcers were included in six publications, including 148 patients in the experimental group treated with PRP versus 146 patients in the control group treated with conventional therapy. There was a statistically significant difference in the Formula of an ellipse at the end of treatment (CM²) between the experimental group and the control group, with a mean difference of -1.19 (95% CI -1.80 to -0.58, P = .0001; 6 studies, 294 participants moderate quality of evidence). The difference between the healing rate of the experimental group and the control group was statistically significant, with a risk ratio (RR) of 5.73 (95% CI 3.29 - 9.99, P < .00001; 5 studies, 248 participants moderate quality of evidence).There may be publication bias for both Formula of an ellipse at the end of treatment and healing rate. This comprehensive meta-analysis of available evidence suggests that the application of PRP for lower extremity venous ulcers accelerates the wound healing process and improves wound healing rates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗下肢静脉溃疡的临床研究:荟萃分析和系统评价。
应用荟萃分析方法系统评价富血小板血浆治疗下肢静脉溃疡的临床疗效。在Pubmed、Cochrance Library、Embase和OVID EBM Reviews数据库中搜索术语“富含血小板的血浆”或“血浆,富含血小板”或“富含血小板血浆”和“下肢静脉溃疡”或“腿部溃疡”或,Leg”,并对1900年1月至2021年4月发表的关于富血小板血浆治疗下肢静脉溃疡的研究文献进行了荟萃分析。结果指标为:治疗后创伤面积和治愈率。采用Revman 5.3统计软件进行荟萃分析。共有294名下肢静脉溃疡患者被纳入六份出版物中,其中实验组148名患者接受PRP治疗,对照组146名患者接受常规治疗。实验组和对照组在治疗结束时的椭圆公式(CM²)上存在统计学上的显著差异,平均差异为-1.19(95%CI-1.80至-0.58,P = .0001;6项研究,294名参与者的证据质量中等)。实验组和对照组的治愈率差异具有统计学意义,风险比(RR)为5.73(95%CI 3.29-9.99,P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
95
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds (IJLEW) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, reviews of evidence-based diagnostic techniques and methods, disease and patient management, and surgical and medical therapeutics for lower extremity wounds such as burns, stomas, ulcers, fistulas, and traumatic wounds. IJLEW also offers evaluations of assessment and monitoring tools, dressings, gels, cleansers, pressure management, footwear/orthotics, casting, and bioengineered skin. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Identification of High-Risk Lower Extremity Wounds Using Point-of-Care Test for Bacterial Protease Activity; A Single-Centre, Single-Blinded, Prospective Study Retracted: "The Leg Subcutaneous Tissue Calcification and Venous Ulcer-a Case Series". Sticking to What Matters: A Matched Comparative Study of Fibrin Glue and Mechanical Fixation for Split-Thickness Skin Grafts in the Lower Extremity. Cases of Lower Extremity and Perianal Burns at the Burn Center in the Southeast Anatolia of Turkey. Superficial Tissue Swabs Versus Deep Tissue Samples in the Detection of Microbiological Profile of Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcerations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1