Accuracy of artificial intelligence-assisted landmark identification in serial lateral cephalograms of Class III patients who underwent orthodontic treatment and two-jaw orthognathic surgery.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q1 Dentistry Korean Journal of Orthodontics Pub Date : 2022-07-25 Epub Date: 2022-06-20 DOI:10.4041/kjod21.248
Mihee Hong, Inhwan Kim, Jin-Hyoung Cho, Kyung-Hwa Kang, Minji Kim, Su-Jung Kim, Yoon-Ji Kim, Sang-Jin Sung, Young Ho Kim, Sung-Hoon Lim, Namkug Kim, Seung-Hak Baek
{"title":"Accuracy of artificial intelligence-assisted landmark identification in serial lateral cephalograms of Class III patients who underwent orthodontic treatment and two-jaw orthognathic surgery.","authors":"Mihee Hong,&nbsp;Inhwan Kim,&nbsp;Jin-Hyoung Cho,&nbsp;Kyung-Hwa Kang,&nbsp;Minji Kim,&nbsp;Su-Jung Kim,&nbsp;Yoon-Ji Kim,&nbsp;Sang-Jin Sung,&nbsp;Young Ho Kim,&nbsp;Sung-Hoon Lim,&nbsp;Namkug Kim,&nbsp;Seung-Hak Baek","doi":"10.4041/kjod21.248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the pattern of accuracy change in artificial intelligence-assisted landmark identification (LI) using a convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm in serial lateral cephalograms (Lat-cephs) of Class III (C-III) patients who underwent two-jaw orthognathic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 3,188 Lat-cephs of C-III patients were allocated into the training and validation sets (3,004 Lat-cephs of 751 patients) and test set (184 Lat-cephs of 46 patients; subdivided into the genioplasty and non-genioplasty groups, n = 23 per group) for LI. Each C-III patient in the test set had four Lat-cephs: initial (T0), pre-surgery (T1, presence of orthodontic brackets [OBs]), post-surgery (T2, presence of OBs and surgical plates and screws [S-PS]), and debonding (T3, presence of S-PS and fixed retainers [FR]). After mean errors of 20 landmarks between human gold standard and the CNN model were calculated, statistical analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total mean error was 1.17 mm without significant difference among the four time-points (T0, 1.20 mm; T1, 1.14 mm; T2, 1.18 mm; T3, 1.15 mm). In comparison of two time-points ([T0, T1] vs. [T2, T3]), ANS, A point, and B point showed an increase in error (<i>p</i> < 0.01, 0.05, 0.01, respectively), while Mx6D and Md6D showeda decrease in error (all <i>p</i> < 0.01). No difference in errors existed at B point, Pogonion, Menton, Md1C, and Md1R between the genioplasty and non-genioplasty groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CNN model can be used for LI in serial Lat-cephs despite the presence of OB, S-PS, FR, genioplasty, and bone remodeling.</p>","PeriodicalId":49934,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Orthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a2/31/kjod-52-4-287.PMC9314217.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod21.248","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the pattern of accuracy change in artificial intelligence-assisted landmark identification (LI) using a convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm in serial lateral cephalograms (Lat-cephs) of Class III (C-III) patients who underwent two-jaw orthognathic surgery.

Methods: A total of 3,188 Lat-cephs of C-III patients were allocated into the training and validation sets (3,004 Lat-cephs of 751 patients) and test set (184 Lat-cephs of 46 patients; subdivided into the genioplasty and non-genioplasty groups, n = 23 per group) for LI. Each C-III patient in the test set had four Lat-cephs: initial (T0), pre-surgery (T1, presence of orthodontic brackets [OBs]), post-surgery (T2, presence of OBs and surgical plates and screws [S-PS]), and debonding (T3, presence of S-PS and fixed retainers [FR]). After mean errors of 20 landmarks between human gold standard and the CNN model were calculated, statistical analysis was performed.

Results: The total mean error was 1.17 mm without significant difference among the four time-points (T0, 1.20 mm; T1, 1.14 mm; T2, 1.18 mm; T3, 1.15 mm). In comparison of two time-points ([T0, T1] vs. [T2, T3]), ANS, A point, and B point showed an increase in error (p < 0.01, 0.05, 0.01, respectively), while Mx6D and Md6D showeda decrease in error (all p < 0.01). No difference in errors existed at B point, Pogonion, Menton, Md1C, and Md1R between the genioplasty and non-genioplasty groups.

Conclusions: The CNN model can be used for LI in serial Lat-cephs despite the presence of OB, S-PS, FR, genioplasty, and bone remodeling.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能辅助地标识别在III类患者接受正畸治疗和双颌正颌手术的系列侧位脑电图中的准确性。
目的:探讨基于卷积神经网络(CNN)算法的人工智能辅助地标识别(LI)在III类(C-III)患者行双颌正颌手术后连续侧位脑电图(latcephs)中的准确性变化规律。方法:将3188例C-III患者的latc -ceph分为训练集和验证集(751例患者中有3004例latc -ceph)和测试集(46例患者中有184例latc -ceph);LI进一步分为颏成形术组和非颏成形术组,每组n = 23)。每个C-III患者在测试集中有四个后期:初始(T0),术前(T1,存在正畸托槽[OBs]),术后(T2,存在正畸托槽和手术钢板和螺钉[S-PS])和脱粘(T3,存在S-PS和固定固位[FR])。计算人类黄金标准与CNN模型之间20个地标的平均误差后,进行统计分析。结果:4个时间点的总平均误差为1.17 mm,差异无统计学意义(T0, 1.20 mm;T1, 1.14 mm;T2, 1.18 mm;T3, 1.15 mm)。两个时间点([T0, T1]与[T2, T3])比较,ANS、A点、B点误差增大(p分别< 0.01、0.05、0.01),而Mx6D、Md6D误差减小(p均< 0.01)。在B点、Pogonion、Menton、Md1C和Md1R的误差在生殖器成形术组和非生殖器成形术组之间没有差异。结论:尽管存在OB、S-PS、FR、颏成形术和骨重塑,CNN模型仍可用于连续晚期脑梗死的LI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Orthodontics
Korean Journal of Orthodontics Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Korean Journal of Orthodontics (KJO) is an international, open access, peer reviewed journal published in January, March, May, July, September, and November each year. It was first launched in 1970 and, as the official scientific publication of Korean Association of Orthodontists, KJO aims to publish high quality clinical and scientific original research papers in all areas related to orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. Specifically, its interest focuses on evidence-based investigations of contemporary diagnostic procedures and treatment techniques, expanding to significant clinical reports of diverse treatment approaches. The scope of KJO covers all areas of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics including successful diagnostic procedures and treatment planning, growth and development of the face and its clinical implications, appliance designs, biomechanics, TMJ disorders and adult treatment. Specifically, its latest interest focuses on skeletal anchorage devices, orthodontic appliance and biomaterials, 3 dimensional imaging techniques utilized for dentofacial diagnosis and treatment planning, and orthognathic surgery to correct skeletal disharmony in association of orthodontic treatment.
期刊最新文献
Clinical expression of programmed maxillary buccal expansion and buccolingual crown inclination with Invisalign EX30 and SmartTrack aligners and the effect of 1-week vs. 2-week aligner change regimes: A retrospective cohort study. Orthodontic treatment in a patient with Moebius syndrome: A case report. Clinical effects of different prescriptions on the inclination of maxillary and mandibular incisors by using passive self-ligating brackets. Enhancement of bioactivity and osseointegration in Ti-6Al-4V orthodontic mini-screws coated with calcium phosphate on the TiO2 nanotube layer. Crown-root angulations of the maxillary anterior teeth according to malocclusions: A cone-beam computed tomography study in Korean population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1