Endoscopic Plantar Fascia Release Combined With Calcaneal Spur Resection: A Case Series of 40 Patients.

Foot & ankle specialist Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-05 DOI:10.1177/19386400221122761
Kenichiro Nakajima
{"title":"Endoscopic Plantar Fascia Release Combined With Calcaneal Spur Resection: A Case Series of 40 Patients.","authors":"Kenichiro Nakajima","doi":"10.1177/19386400221122761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To review the cases of patients treated using endoscopic plantar fascia release (PFR) with calcaneal spur resection (CSR) and examine why the combined procedures cause complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records of patients treated with endoscopic PFR with CSR from November 2017 to December 2019 with a follow-up of >2 years were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 40 feet in 40 patients (22 females, 18 males) were enrolled. The mean age and body mass index were 51.1 years and 24.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The mean follow-up duration was 5.7 years. The visual analog scale for pain improved from 80.7 to 8.8 mm, and the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot score improved from 44.7 to 95.6 points (Wilcoxon signed rank test, P < .001 for both). Complications occurred in 8 patients (20%): 3 had flatfoot, 3 had an injury to the first branch of the lateral plantar nerve, 1 had scar pain, and 1 had a wound infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 40 patients treated with endoscopic PFR with CSR for plantar fasciitis had good outcomes with a high complication rate; the invasiveness of creating the working space for the combined procedures was thought to be responsible.</p><p><strong>Levels of evidence: </strong>Level IV: Case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"51-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400221122761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To review the cases of patients treated using endoscopic plantar fascia release (PFR) with calcaneal spur resection (CSR) and examine why the combined procedures cause complications.

Methods: The medical records of patients treated with endoscopic PFR with CSR from November 2017 to December 2019 with a follow-up of >2 years were reviewed.

Results: A total of 40 feet in 40 patients (22 females, 18 males) were enrolled. The mean age and body mass index were 51.1 years and 24.7 kg/m2, respectively. The mean follow-up duration was 5.7 years. The visual analog scale for pain improved from 80.7 to 8.8 mm, and the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot score improved from 44.7 to 95.6 points (Wilcoxon signed rank test, P < .001 for both). Complications occurred in 8 patients (20%): 3 had flatfoot, 3 had an injury to the first branch of the lateral plantar nerve, 1 had scar pain, and 1 had a wound infection.

Conclusion: The 40 patients treated with endoscopic PFR with CSR for plantar fasciitis had good outcomes with a high complication rate; the invasiveness of creating the working space for the combined procedures was thought to be responsible.

Levels of evidence: Level IV: Case series.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内窥镜足底筋膜松解术联合腓骨骨刺切除术:40 例患者的病例系列。
目的:回顾内镜下足底筋膜松解术(PFR)联合小骨刺切除术(CSR)治疗患者的病例,研究联合手术引起并发症的原因:回顾性分析2017年11月至2019年12月期间接受内窥镜足底筋膜松解术(PFR)联合小关节骨刺切除术(CSR)治疗的患者的病历,随访时间大于2年:共纳入40名患者的40只脚(22名女性,18名男性)。平均年龄和体重指数分别为 51.1 岁和 24.7 kg/m2。平均随访时间为 5.7 年。疼痛视觉模拟量表从 80.7 毫米改善到 8.8 毫米,日本足外科协会评分从 44.7 分改善到 95.6 分(Wilcoxon 符号秩检验,P < .001)。8名患者(20%)出现并发症:3例为扁平足,3例为足外侧神经第一支损伤,1例为疤痕疼痛,1例为伤口感染:结论:采用内窥镜PFR联合CSR治疗足底筋膜炎的40例患者疗效良好,但并发症发生率较高;为联合手术创造工作空间的侵入性被认为是原因之一:IV级:病例系列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Incidental Finding of Plantar Plate Pathology on Routine Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Foot and Ankle. Non-emergent Conditions of the Ankle, Hindfoot, and Midfoot in Elderly Patients Are as Mobility Limiting as Congestive Heart Failure. Midfoot Joint Arthrodesis Using Compression Plate With Lag Screw Augmenting With Highly Porous β-Tricalcium Phosphate and Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate. A Survey Analysis of Patient Understanding and Preferences for Podiatrists Versus Foot and Ankle Orthopaedic Surgeons. Endoscopic Plantar Fascia Release Combined With Calcaneal Spur Resection: A Case Series of 40 Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1