Multi-dimensional readiness assessment of medical devices

R. Seva, Angela Li Sin Tan, L. Tejero, M. Salvacion
{"title":"Multi-dimensional readiness assessment of medical devices","authors":"R. Seva, Angela Li Sin Tan, L. Tejero, M. Salvacion","doi":"10.1080/1463922X.2022.2064934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Medical device (MD) developers currently use the Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs) to determine the status of technology. However, the broad definition of each level makes it difficult to ascertain readiness of MDs. The TRL is also indifferent to the strict regulatory requirements for MDs, requirements for human systems integration, and market competition. This paper proposes a technology readiness framework for communicating and planning the development of Class III MDs called the Medical Device Readiness Levels (MDRLs). Five exit criteria were staged in a meaningful sequence within the framework: safety, clinical effectiveness, usability, comfort, and affective response. It also incorporates the stakeholders’ perspectives, mindful of the users’ varying needs in manipulating the MD. The usefulness of the framework was affirmed by professionals involved in MD development.","PeriodicalId":22852,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science","volume":"512 ","pages":"189 - 205"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2022.2064934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Medical device (MD) developers currently use the Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs) to determine the status of technology. However, the broad definition of each level makes it difficult to ascertain readiness of MDs. The TRL is also indifferent to the strict regulatory requirements for MDs, requirements for human systems integration, and market competition. This paper proposes a technology readiness framework for communicating and planning the development of Class III MDs called the Medical Device Readiness Levels (MDRLs). Five exit criteria were staged in a meaningful sequence within the framework: safety, clinical effectiveness, usability, comfort, and affective response. It also incorporates the stakeholders’ perspectives, mindful of the users’ varying needs in manipulating the MD. The usefulness of the framework was affirmed by professionals involved in MD development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗器械的多维准备评估
医疗器械(MD)开发人员目前使用技术就绪水平(trl)来确定技术的状态。然而,每个级别的广泛定义使得难以确定MDs的准备情况。TRL对md的严格监管要求、对人类系统集成的要求和市场竞争也漠不关心。本文提出了一个技术准备框架,用于沟通和规划第三类医疗器械的发展,称为医疗器械准备水平(mdrl)。五个退出标准在框架内按有意义的顺序进行:安全性,临床有效性,可用性,舒适性和情感反应。它也纳入了持份者的观点,并考虑到用户在操纵决策过程中的不同需求。参与决策发展的专业人士肯定了该框架的有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Conceptual framework for the design and development of sustainability-oriented products: toward EQUID 4.0 Trust building with artificial intelligence: comparing with human in investment behaviour, emotional arousal and neuro activities Establishing driving simulator validity: drawbacks of null-hypothesis significance testing when compared to equivalence tests and Bayes factors The influence of industry 4.0, internet of things, and physical-cyber systems on human factors: a case study of workers in Indonesian oil and gas refineries A theoretical model of industrial accidents investigations: a conceptualization of the mental processes that trigger and control investigative activities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1