Promoting Cognitive Complexity Among Violent Extremist Youth in Northern Pakistan

Q2 Social Sciences Journal of Strategic Security Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.5038/1944-0472.15.1.1943
F. Peracha, S. Savage, R. Khan, Asma Ayub, Andleeb Zahra
{"title":"Promoting Cognitive Complexity Among Violent Extremist Youth in Northern Pakistan","authors":"F. Peracha, S. Savage, R. Khan, Asma Ayub, Andleeb Zahra","doi":"10.5038/1944-0472.15.1.1943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reports on the results of an intervention to promote cognitive complexity (measured by integrative complexity, IC) and perspective taking for youth detained for violent extremism at the Sabaoon Center for Deradicalization and Rehabilitation in northern Pakistan. Participants are sixty-four males (mean age 19.77, SD = 3.26) comprising three cohorts: CVE Detained, CVE Reintegrated, and PVE At-risk.\nThe Sabaoon IC intervention consists of eight sessions with action learning contextualized according to an assessment of the push, pull and personal factors that shape the life experience of the youth. Pre and post testing results show significant gain in IC in the overall sample (Cohen's d= -1.80, 95% CI[-.87,-.49]), and in each cohort, indicating significantly increased ability to perceive validity in one's own changing views and others' differing views along with reduction in derogating or dehumanizing outgroups. Oral presentations showed expected IC scores showing differentiation, with the Reintegrated cohort showing higher order integrations and expressed confidence to be change-makers in their communities.\nTwo subscales from the Violent Extremist Beliefs Survey (concerning beliefs about inter-religious harmony and risk-taking behaviors) showed expected changes, but self-report perspective taking and empathy measures were insignificant.\nLimitations: The entire Sabaoon sample was selected for the intervention, and due to time and operational constraints, it was not feasible to recruit a control group matched on important variables.\nImplications for using IC measurement and method for detained and at risk populations are discussed.","PeriodicalId":37950,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strategic Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strategic Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.15.1.1943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article reports on the results of an intervention to promote cognitive complexity (measured by integrative complexity, IC) and perspective taking for youth detained for violent extremism at the Sabaoon Center for Deradicalization and Rehabilitation in northern Pakistan. Participants are sixty-four males (mean age 19.77, SD = 3.26) comprising three cohorts: CVE Detained, CVE Reintegrated, and PVE At-risk. The Sabaoon IC intervention consists of eight sessions with action learning contextualized according to an assessment of the push, pull and personal factors that shape the life experience of the youth. Pre and post testing results show significant gain in IC in the overall sample (Cohen's d= -1.80, 95% CI[-.87,-.49]), and in each cohort, indicating significantly increased ability to perceive validity in one's own changing views and others' differing views along with reduction in derogating or dehumanizing outgroups. Oral presentations showed expected IC scores showing differentiation, with the Reintegrated cohort showing higher order integrations and expressed confidence to be change-makers in their communities. Two subscales from the Violent Extremist Beliefs Survey (concerning beliefs about inter-religious harmony and risk-taking behaviors) showed expected changes, but self-report perspective taking and empathy measures were insignificant. Limitations: The entire Sabaoon sample was selected for the intervention, and due to time and operational constraints, it was not feasible to recruit a control group matched on important variables. Implications for using IC measurement and method for detained and at risk populations are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进巴基斯坦北部暴力极端主义青年的认知复杂性
本文报道了巴基斯坦北部Sabaoon去极端化和康复中心对因暴力极端主义而被拘留的青年进行干预以提高认知复杂性(以综合复杂性,IC衡量)和视角的结果。参与者为64名男性(平均年龄19.77岁,SD = 3.26),包括三个队列:CVE拘留组、CVE重新整合组和PVE高危组。Sabaoon IC干预包括八个课程,根据对影响青少年生活经历的推动、拉动和个人因素的评估,以行动学习为背景。前后测试结果显示,在整个样本中(Cohen’s d= -1.80, 95% CI[- 0.87,- 0.49]),以及在每个队列中,IC都有显着增加,表明在自己不断变化的观点和他人不同的观点中感知有效性的能力显著增强,同时贬低或贬低外群体的能力也显著增强。口头报告显示,预期的IC分数显示出差异,重新整合的队列显示出更高的整合顺序,并表示有信心成为社区的变革者。暴力极端主义信念调查的两个子量表(关于宗教间和谐和冒险行为的信念)显示出预期的变化,但自我报告的观点采取和共情措施不显著。局限性:我们选择了整个Sabaoon样本进行干预,由于时间和操作的限制,无法招募在重要变量上匹配的对照组。讨论了在拘留和危险人群中使用IC测量和方法的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Strategic Security
Journal of Strategic Security Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Strategic Security (JSS) is a double-blind peer-reviewed professional journal published quarterly by Henley-Putnam School of Strategic Security with support from the University of South Florida Libraries. The Journal provides a multi-disciplinary forum for scholarship and discussion of strategic security issues drawing from the fields of global security, international relations, intelligence, terrorism and counterterrorism studies, among others. JSS is indexed in SCOPUS, the Directory of Open Access Journals, and several EBSCOhost and ProQuest databases.
期刊最新文献
Engagement with Radical Propaganda drives Cognitive Radicalization: An Analysis of a Right-Wing Online Ecosystem A Country of Defiance: Mapping the Casamance in Senegal. By Mark W. Deets. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2023 Bukele’s Formula for Terrorism “Divergent Perspectives: A Comparative Review of ‘The Nuclear Club’ and ‘Winning and Losing the Nuclear Peace’” Hybrid Warfare: How to Escape the Conceptual Gray-Zone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1