Analysis of academic stakeholders' satisfaction on green campus implementation in Telkom University using importance performance analysis approach

C. I. Setiawati, A. Maulana
{"title":"Analysis of academic stakeholders' satisfaction on green campus implementation in Telkom University using importance performance analysis approach","authors":"C. I. Setiawati, A. Maulana","doi":"10.1504/ijlc.2022.10025867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to identify the level of satisfaction of the academic community towards the implementation of green campus that took place in higher education institution, especially universities that have been awarded as green campus, by focusing in four elements of green campus, environmental management system, green building and green transportation, community participation and social responsibility, and teaching as well as research regarding sustainability. A survey questionnaire was used to collect data on sample of 100 respondents consist of all civitas academics in higher education institution. This paper uses importance performance analysis (IPA) approach technique in analysing data to find the gap between performance and expectation in term of green campus implementation. The average score of all aspects of the statement at the perception level is 3.25 while the average score of expectation level is 4.22 with a difference or gap of −0.77. The negative point shows that the perception level has not fulfilled the academic community's expectation in terms of green campus implementation from whole elements and indicators in Telkom University.","PeriodicalId":38014,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Learning and Change","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Learning and Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijlc.2022.10025867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to identify the level of satisfaction of the academic community towards the implementation of green campus that took place in higher education institution, especially universities that have been awarded as green campus, by focusing in four elements of green campus, environmental management system, green building and green transportation, community participation and social responsibility, and teaching as well as research regarding sustainability. A survey questionnaire was used to collect data on sample of 100 respondents consist of all civitas academics in higher education institution. This paper uses importance performance analysis (IPA) approach technique in analysing data to find the gap between performance and expectation in term of green campus implementation. The average score of all aspects of the statement at the perception level is 3.25 while the average score of expectation level is 4.22 with a difference or gap of −0.77. The negative point shows that the perception level has not fulfilled the academic community's expectation in terms of green campus implementation from whole elements and indicators in Telkom University.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用重要性-绩效分析法分析Telkom大学学术利益相关者对绿色校园实施的满意度
本文的目的是通过关注绿色校园、环境管理体系、绿色建筑和绿色交通四个要素,确定学术界对高等教育机构,特别是被授予绿色校园的大学实施绿色校园的满意度,社区参与和社会责任,以及关于可持续性的教学和研究。采用调查问卷对100名受访者进行了数据收集,这些受访者包括高等教育机构的所有公民学者。本文采用重要绩效分析(IPA)方法对数据进行分析,以找出绿色校园实施中绩效与预期之间的差距。在感知水平上,陈述各方面的平均得分为3.25,而期望水平的平均得分则为4.22,差异或差距为-0.77。负面观点表明,从整体要素和指标来看,Telkom大学在绿色校园实施方面的感知水平没有达到学术界的预期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: IJLC seeks to improve the understanding and approach to learning by addressing both theoretical and practical issues that have a high relevance to reforming and revitalising organisational capability, knowledge and intellectual assets. Learning is essential to individuals and organisations, whilst change is inevitable and needs to be managed wherever possible. IJLC is dedicated to the advancement of knowledge of management of learning and change, especially the process and method of learning and change in science-based and technology-driven developments and applications. Topics covered include: -Individual/organisational learning processes -Experiences/knowledge management, absorption processes -Technological/social change processes -Knowledge/learning connections -Situated/problem-based/electronic/multimedia learning/action -Communication, relationships, networking, collaborations -Increasing organisational productivity, managing sustainable change -Knowledge creation/diffusion, transfer processes -Community of learning and practices -Individual/organisational/capability learning -Science/technology learning/education -Narratives/metaphor/storytelling in organisational learning -Organisational structures, governance, political factors, policies -Ethical issues of (management of) change -Nature/quality of learning/change/knowledge, qualitative research methods
期刊最新文献
Influence of business model and marketing environment of Thai gems and jewellery during COVID-19 pandemic: opportunities and challenges Scope of the augmented reality applications in education sector: bibliographic review Social entrepreneurial intention and its antecedents: a narrative review-based study The relationship of training and learning, and the diversity of sources of innovation's ideas with the social innovation in non-profit organisations: evidence from Ecuador International learning experience in different cultures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1