The social enterprise company in Europe: policy and theory

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q1 LAW Journal of Corporate Law Studies Pub Date : 2020-03-27 DOI:10.1080/14735970.2020.1744409
J. S. Liptrap
{"title":"The social enterprise company in Europe: policy and theory","authors":"J. S. Liptrap","doi":"10.1080/14735970.2020.1744409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Corporate organisational constructs facilitating social enterprise have proliferated for the last decade across Europe. This article investigates this phenomenon, and provides an initial analytical framework through which the social enterprise company can be understood, both on its own terms and with respect to the traditional business organisation. The article begins by laying out policymakers' collective intentions for creating the social enterprise company. The discussion then turns to theorising the social enterprise company's organisational architecture. The social enterprise company is a hybrid organisational construct designed to generate social value. For this reason it operates according to the principle of publicness. The intention was also for the social enterprise company to be resource flexible and attract altruistic investors and managers. The article then further extends the theoretical discussion by mapping early stage and later stage investor involvement with reference to the current state of the impact investment landscape, and investigates how these considerations relate to the jurisdictions' isomorphic prevention mechanisms, which encourage impact fidelity in the context of a conversion or a winding up.","PeriodicalId":44517,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Law Studies","volume":"20 1","pages":"495 - 539"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14735970.2020.1744409","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Law Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2020.1744409","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT Corporate organisational constructs facilitating social enterprise have proliferated for the last decade across Europe. This article investigates this phenomenon, and provides an initial analytical framework through which the social enterprise company can be understood, both on its own terms and with respect to the traditional business organisation. The article begins by laying out policymakers' collective intentions for creating the social enterprise company. The discussion then turns to theorising the social enterprise company's organisational architecture. The social enterprise company is a hybrid organisational construct designed to generate social value. For this reason it operates according to the principle of publicness. The intention was also for the social enterprise company to be resource flexible and attract altruistic investors and managers. The article then further extends the theoretical discussion by mapping early stage and later stage investor involvement with reference to the current state of the impact investment landscape, and investigates how these considerations relate to the jurisdictions' isomorphic prevention mechanisms, which encourage impact fidelity in the context of a conversion or a winding up.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲社会企业:政策与理论
在过去的十年里,促进社会企业发展的企业组织结构在欧洲各地激增。本文调查了这一现象,并提供了一个初步的分析框架,通过这个框架,社会企业公司可以被理解,无论是在其自身的条件下,还是在传统商业组织方面。本文首先阐述了政策制定者创建社会企业公司的集体意图。然后,讨论转向理论化社会企业公司的组织架构。社会企业公司是一种混合型组织结构,旨在创造社会价值。因此,它按照公共性的原则运作。其目的还在于使社会企业公司具有资源灵活性,并吸引无私的投资者和管理者。然后,本文进一步扩展了理论讨论,通过参考影响投资环境的现状,绘制早期和后期投资者参与的地图,并调查了这些考虑与司法管辖区的同构预防机制之间的关系,这些机制在转换或清盘的背景下鼓励影响保真度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
The extension of vicarious liability in corporate groups Investor personhood: the case against paternalism and welfarism in corporate law Separate legal personality – an explanation and a defence Directors’ positive duty to act in the interests of the entity: shareholders’ interests bounded by corporate purpose Private credit: a renaissance in corporate finance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1