Post-crisis imaginaries in the time of direct-acting antiviral hepatitis C treatment

IF 2.2 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Time & Society Pub Date : 2022-09-22 DOI:10.1177/0961463X221128736
Renae Fomiatti, A. Farrugia, S. Fraser, D. Moore, Michael Edwards, C. Treloar
{"title":"Post-crisis imaginaries in the time of direct-acting antiviral hepatitis C treatment","authors":"Renae Fomiatti, A. Farrugia, S. Fraser, D. Moore, Michael Edwards, C. Treloar","doi":"10.1177/0961463X221128736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Until the recent introduction of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) medications, the only available hepatitis C treatments were lengthy and onerous interferon-based therapies, with relatively weak success rates. While experiences of interferon-based treatment have been well documented, there is a need to better understand how the experiences of the ‘old’ treatments shape contemporary treatment experiences. This article uses the concept of ‘post-crisis’ developed in critical scholarship on HIV/AIDS, and recent theorisations of ‘curative time’, to explore the relationship between contemporary treatment experiences and the legacies of interferon-based therapies. In mobilising these concepts, we trouble linear temporal logics that take for granted distinctions between the past and present, old and new, and cure and post-cure, and draw attention to the fluidity of time and the overlapping co-constitutive terrains of meaning that shape treatment experiences. Drawing on 50 interviews with people affected by hepatitis C, we argue that the curative imaginary of DAA treatments – that is, the temporal framing applied to hepatitis C in which cure is expected and assumed – is shaped by the logic of crisis. Here, knowledge of and the possibilities for the new treatments and living with hepatitis C remain tethered to crisis accounts of interferon. Unlike HIV/AIDS, in which the disease itself was figured as crisis, many participants described interferon-based treatments as the crisis: as worse than living with hepatitis C. While the new treatments were widely described as simple and easy, we argue that treatment is not so straightforward and that the crisis/post-crisis relation is central to this complexity. We conclude by considering the significance of these post-crisis enactments for understanding the recent plateauing of DAA treatment uptake, and reflect on how post-crisis futures of hepatitis C ‘cure’ need to address the ongoing constitutive effects of interferon-based treatments.","PeriodicalId":47347,"journal":{"name":"Time & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Time & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X221128736","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Until the recent introduction of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) medications, the only available hepatitis C treatments were lengthy and onerous interferon-based therapies, with relatively weak success rates. While experiences of interferon-based treatment have been well documented, there is a need to better understand how the experiences of the ‘old’ treatments shape contemporary treatment experiences. This article uses the concept of ‘post-crisis’ developed in critical scholarship on HIV/AIDS, and recent theorisations of ‘curative time’, to explore the relationship between contemporary treatment experiences and the legacies of interferon-based therapies. In mobilising these concepts, we trouble linear temporal logics that take for granted distinctions between the past and present, old and new, and cure and post-cure, and draw attention to the fluidity of time and the overlapping co-constitutive terrains of meaning that shape treatment experiences. Drawing on 50 interviews with people affected by hepatitis C, we argue that the curative imaginary of DAA treatments – that is, the temporal framing applied to hepatitis C in which cure is expected and assumed – is shaped by the logic of crisis. Here, knowledge of and the possibilities for the new treatments and living with hepatitis C remain tethered to crisis accounts of interferon. Unlike HIV/AIDS, in which the disease itself was figured as crisis, many participants described interferon-based treatments as the crisis: as worse than living with hepatitis C. While the new treatments were widely described as simple and easy, we argue that treatment is not so straightforward and that the crisis/post-crisis relation is central to this complexity. We conclude by considering the significance of these post-crisis enactments for understanding the recent plateauing of DAA treatment uptake, and reflect on how post-crisis futures of hepatitis C ‘cure’ need to address the ongoing constitutive effects of interferon-based treatments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直接作用抗病毒丙型肝炎治疗期间的危机后想象
在最近引入直接作用抗病毒(DAA)药物之前,唯一可用的丙型肝炎治疗方法是漫长而繁重的干扰素治疗,成功率相对较低。虽然干扰素治疗的经验已经有了很好的记录,但有必要更好地了解“旧”治疗的经验是如何塑造当代治疗经验的。本文利用艾滋病病毒/艾滋病批判性学术中发展起来的“后危机”概念,以及最近的“治疗时间”理论,探讨当代治疗经验与干扰素疗法遗产之间的关系。在调动这些概念的过程中,我们遇到了线性时间逻辑的麻烦,这些逻辑认为过去和现在、新旧、治愈和后治愈之间的区别是理所当然的,并提请注意时间的流动性和塑造治疗体验的意义的重叠共构地形。根据对丙型肝炎患者的50次采访,我们认为DAA治疗的治疗想象——也就是说,应用于丙型肝炎的时间框架,其中治愈是预期和假设的——是由危机逻辑形成的。在这里,对新治疗方法和丙型肝炎患者的了解和可能性仍然与干扰素的危机报道有关。与艾滋病毒/艾滋病不同,在艾滋病毒/艾滋病中,疾病本身被视为危机,许多参与者将基于干扰素的治疗描述为危机:比丙型肝炎更糟糕。虽然新的治疗方法被广泛描述为简单易行,但我们认为治疗并不那么简单,危机/危机后的关系是这种复杂性的核心。最后,我们考虑了这些危机后法规对理解DAA治疗摄入最近趋于平稳的重要性,并思考了丙型肝炎危机后“治愈”的未来需要如何解决干扰素治疗的持续组成效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Time & Society
Time & Society SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Time & Society publishes articles, reviews, and scholarly comment discussing the workings of time and temporality across a range of disciplines, including anthropology, geography, history, psychology, and sociology. Work focuses on methodological and theoretical problems, including the use of time in organizational contexts. You"ll also find critiques of and proposals for time-related changes in the formation of public, social, economic, and organizational policies.
期刊最新文献
Beyond mothers’ time in childcare: Worlds of care and connection in the early life course Time use studies, time, temporality, and measuring care: Conceptual, methodological, and epistemological issues Fixing stone in time: Making and measuring consolidants for heritage futures Time and the Anthropocene: Making more-than-human temporalities legible through environmental observations and creative methods Hope and time work in dystopian contexts: Future-oriented temporalities of activism in post-referendum Scotland and Turkey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1