Digital Mammography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics in Differential Diagnosis of Papillary Carcinoma Subtypes of the Breast and Diagnostic Challenges.

Tuğba İlkem Kurtoğlu Özçağlayan, M. Öznur
{"title":"Digital Mammography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics in Differential Diagnosis of Papillary Carcinoma Subtypes of the Breast and Diagnostic Challenges.","authors":"Tuğba İlkem Kurtoğlu Özçağlayan, M. Öznur","doi":"10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2021-9-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective\nWe aimed to investigate mammography (MG), ultrasound (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of papillary breast carcinoma subtypes and to compare the diagnostic features and performance of the imaging method in distinguishing subtypes.\n\n\nMaterials and Methods\nForty-two patients presenting with pathological diagnosis of 45 papillary carcinoma lesions, between 2014 and 2019, were included. Cases were assigned to five subgroups according to the latest World Health Organization (WHO) classification. The clinical characteristics (n = 45) and imaging features of each pathological subgroup were retrospectively related to imaging findings from US (n = 45), MG (n = 37), and breast MRI (n = 23), and further compared.\n\n\nResults\nThe finding of a palpable mass in all subgroups was more common than nipple discharge on clinical breast evaluation, and no significant difference was found between the subgroups. Irregular shape on MG (10/12, 83.3%, p = 0.039) and US (11/12, 91.7%, p = 0.039) was found more frequently in invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) compared to other subgroups. Circumscribed margins (4/5, 80%, p = 0.002) occurred more frequently in papillary ductal carcinoma in situ (pDCIS) and encapsulated papillary carcinoma (EPC) than in other subgroups (6/8, 75%, p = 0.002). Lower apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were found in solid papillary cancer (SPC) than in other subgroups (ADC = 0.35 x 10-3, p = 0.017).\n\n\nConclusion\nRadiological findings of papillary carcinomas overlap with each other. US and MRI are complementary when revealing specific morphological characteristics.","PeriodicalId":91975,"journal":{"name":"The journal of breast health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of breast health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2021-9-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective We aimed to investigate mammography (MG), ultrasound (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of papillary breast carcinoma subtypes and to compare the diagnostic features and performance of the imaging method in distinguishing subtypes. Materials and Methods Forty-two patients presenting with pathological diagnosis of 45 papillary carcinoma lesions, between 2014 and 2019, were included. Cases were assigned to five subgroups according to the latest World Health Organization (WHO) classification. The clinical characteristics (n = 45) and imaging features of each pathological subgroup were retrospectively related to imaging findings from US (n = 45), MG (n = 37), and breast MRI (n = 23), and further compared. Results The finding of a palpable mass in all subgroups was more common than nipple discharge on clinical breast evaluation, and no significant difference was found between the subgroups. Irregular shape on MG (10/12, 83.3%, p = 0.039) and US (11/12, 91.7%, p = 0.039) was found more frequently in invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) compared to other subgroups. Circumscribed margins (4/5, 80%, p = 0.002) occurred more frequently in papillary ductal carcinoma in situ (pDCIS) and encapsulated papillary carcinoma (EPC) than in other subgroups (6/8, 75%, p = 0.002). Lower apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were found in solid papillary cancer (SPC) than in other subgroups (ADC = 0.35 x 10-3, p = 0.017). Conclusion Radiological findings of papillary carcinomas overlap with each other. US and MRI are complementary when revealing specific morphological characteristics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字乳房x线摄影、超声和磁共振成像在乳腺乳头状癌亚型鉴别诊断中的特点和诊断挑战。
目的研究乳腺乳头状癌亚型的钼靶x线(MG)、超声(US)和磁共振成像(MRI)表现,并比较影像学方法在区分亚型方面的诊断特征和性能。材料和方法纳入2014年至2019年间42例病理诊断为45个乳头状癌病变的患者。根据世界卫生组织(世界卫生组织)的最新分类,病例被分为五个亚组。将每个病理亚组的临床特征(n=45)和影像学特征与US(n=45、MG(n=37)和乳腺MRI(n=23)的影像学表现进行回顾性关联,并进行进一步比较。结果在临床乳腺评估中,所有亚组的可触及肿块的发现都比乳头溢液更常见,并且亚组之间没有显著差异。与其他亚组相比,侵袭性微乳头状癌(IMPC)中MG(10/12,83.3%,p=0.039)和US(11/12,91.7%,p=0.039)的不规则形状更常见。原位乳头状导管癌(pDCIS)和包膜乳头状癌(EPC)的切缘发生率(4/5,80%,p=0.002)高于其他亚组(6/8,75%,p=002)癌彼此重叠。US和MRI在揭示特定形态特征时是互补的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Stromal Elastin Fibers in Breast Cancer and Fibroadenomas: Is There a Correlation With Ultrasound Elastography Findings? Digital Mammography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics in Differential Diagnosis of Papillary Carcinoma Subtypes of the Breast and Diagnostic Challenges. The Benefit of Routine Axillary Sonographic Assessment in cN0 Breast Cancer Patients. Overexpression of miR-490-5p/miR-490-3p Potentially Induces IL-17-Producing T Cells in Patients With Breast Cancer. Patient Satisfaction and Surgical Outcome After Oncoplastic Reconstruction following Radical Lumpectomy Versus Standard Lumpectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1