Living with COVID-19: Opportunities for the Usual Socio-Political Life in an Unusual Situation

D. Pastarmadzhieva, M. Angelova
{"title":"Living with COVID-19: Opportunities for the Usual Socio-Political Life in an Unusual Situation","authors":"D. Pastarmadzhieva, M. Angelova","doi":"10.22363/2313-1438-2022-24-3-562-572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic stressed national and international systems and relations and demonstrated the vulnerability of modern societies. The governments were forced to implement restrictive measures in order to protect public health. The most challenging aspect was balancing between public health protection and the functioning of the economy. As this wasn’t easy to reach, some of the governments faced challenges in communicating with the society, resulting in protests. Under these brand-new challenges, the protests only made the task of the governments harder and threatened to harm the fragile political stability. Thus, the aim of the current study is to identify the problems related to the communication between the society and the government and to identify the possible solutions for ensuring the dialogue in such situations. The study focuses on EU citizens and their attitudes toward government measures related to the pandemic in 2020 and 2021. Our materials and methods include review of scientific literature on the topics under considerations. We also performed a secondary processing of quantitative data from Eurobarometer using IBM SPSS v. 26. The results show that the measures limiting civil liberties lead to social tension even if the governments adapt their approach and search for new opportunities. This leads to the conclusion that in order to ensure the normal functioning of the social systems the governments should find ways to include the stakeholders in the decision-making. The latter is possible through digital tools and by developing a system to be implemented in times of crises even if the crisis is not caused by pandemics.","PeriodicalId":32346,"journal":{"name":"RUDN Journal of Political Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUDN Journal of Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2022-24-3-562-572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic stressed national and international systems and relations and demonstrated the vulnerability of modern societies. The governments were forced to implement restrictive measures in order to protect public health. The most challenging aspect was balancing between public health protection and the functioning of the economy. As this wasn’t easy to reach, some of the governments faced challenges in communicating with the society, resulting in protests. Under these brand-new challenges, the protests only made the task of the governments harder and threatened to harm the fragile political stability. Thus, the aim of the current study is to identify the problems related to the communication between the society and the government and to identify the possible solutions for ensuring the dialogue in such situations. The study focuses on EU citizens and their attitudes toward government measures related to the pandemic in 2020 and 2021. Our materials and methods include review of scientific literature on the topics under considerations. We also performed a secondary processing of quantitative data from Eurobarometer using IBM SPSS v. 26. The results show that the measures limiting civil liberties lead to social tension even if the governments adapt their approach and search for new opportunities. This leads to the conclusion that in order to ensure the normal functioning of the social systems the governments should find ways to include the stakeholders in the decision-making. The latter is possible through digital tools and by developing a system to be implemented in times of crises even if the crisis is not caused by pandemics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与新冠肺炎共存:在不寻常的情况下为正常的社会政治生活提供机会
2019冠状病毒病大流行强调了国家和国际制度和关系,并展示了现代社会的脆弱性。各国政府被迫实施限制性措施,以保护公众健康。最具挑战性的方面是在公共卫生保护和经济运作之间取得平衡。由于这并不容易实现,一些政府在与社会沟通方面遇到了挑战,导致了抗议。在这些全新的挑战下,抗议活动只会使政府的任务更加艰巨,并威胁到脆弱的政治稳定。因此,当前研究的目的是确定与社会与政府之间的沟通有关的问题,并确定在这种情况下确保对话的可能解决方案。这项研究的重点是欧盟公民以及他们对2020年和2021年与疫情有关的政府措施的态度。我们的材料和方法包括对所考虑主题的科学文献的回顾。我们还使用IBM SPSS v. 26对Eurobarometer的定量数据进行了二次处理。结果表明,限制公民自由的措施导致社会紧张,即使政府调整他们的方法和寻找新的机会。因此,为了确保社会系统的正常运行,政府应该设法将利益相关者纳入决策。后者可以通过数字工具和开发一个在危机时实施的系统来实现,即使危机不是由流行病引起的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Political Administration VS Political Competition Under Neo-Authoritarian Rule Political Theology of Contingency: Reading Materialists with Carl Schmitt New dilemmas of the «just war» theory Integration of Migrants Through the Lens of a Constructivist Approach to Ethnicity Political Science in Search of New Approaches: Introducing the Issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1