Estimation of Damping for a Double-Layer Grid Using Input-Output and Output-Only Modal Identification Techniques

Sajjad Salehi, M. Davoodi, S. Mostafavian
{"title":"Estimation of Damping for a Double-Layer Grid Using Input-Output and Output-Only Modal Identification Techniques","authors":"Sajjad Salehi, M. Davoodi, S. Mostafavian","doi":"10.22059/CEIJ.2019.284169.1594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In large civil engineering structures, the output-only modal identification is the most applicable technique for estimating the modal parameters such as damping. However, due to no measurement and control of excitation force, the identified parameters obtained by output-only technique have more uncertainty than those derived from the input-output technique. Given the different nature and uncertainties of the two modal identification techniques, in the present study, the damping related to the first 12 modes of a double-layer grid developed from the ball joint system were identified via the two techniques and compared with each other. For this purpose, a double-layer grid was constructed by pipes and balls with free-free boundary conditions provided for both input-output and output-only experiments. Exciting the grid, its acceleration response was measured at appropriate degrees of freedom. Then, by using these data and performing modal analysis, involving four different methods of input-output and five different methods of output-only, the natural frequencies and damping ratios of the desired modes were extracted. The results indicated that despite the good agreement between the modal damping of the grid, as identified by different methods of input-output together and by different methods of output-only together, the results of input-output and output-only methods were different with each other. The damping values through the input-output modal identification methods were on average 65% higher than the corresponding values of the output-only modal identification methods.","PeriodicalId":43959,"journal":{"name":"Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal-CEIJ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal-CEIJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22059/CEIJ.2019.284169.1594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In large civil engineering structures, the output-only modal identification is the most applicable technique for estimating the modal parameters such as damping. However, due to no measurement and control of excitation force, the identified parameters obtained by output-only technique have more uncertainty than those derived from the input-output technique. Given the different nature and uncertainties of the two modal identification techniques, in the present study, the damping related to the first 12 modes of a double-layer grid developed from the ball joint system were identified via the two techniques and compared with each other. For this purpose, a double-layer grid was constructed by pipes and balls with free-free boundary conditions provided for both input-output and output-only experiments. Exciting the grid, its acceleration response was measured at appropriate degrees of freedom. Then, by using these data and performing modal analysis, involving four different methods of input-output and five different methods of output-only, the natural frequencies and damping ratios of the desired modes were extracted. The results indicated that despite the good agreement between the modal damping of the grid, as identified by different methods of input-output together and by different methods of output-only together, the results of input-output and output-only methods were different with each other. The damping values through the input-output modal identification methods were on average 65% higher than the corresponding values of the output-only modal identification methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于输入输出和纯输出模态识别技术的双层网格阻尼估计
在大型土木工程结构中,仅输出模态识别是估计阻尼等模态参数最适用的技术。然而,由于没有激振力的测量和控制,通过仅输出技术获得的识别参数比通过输入-输出技术得到的识别参数具有更大的不确定性。考虑到这两种模态识别技术的不同性质和不确定性,在本研究中,通过这两种技术识别了由球节点系统发展而来的双层网格的前12种模态的阻尼,并进行了比较。为此,由管道和球体构建了双层网格,并为输入输出和仅输出实验提供了自由边界条件。通过激励电网,在适当的自由度下测量其加速度响应。然后,通过使用这些数据并进行模态分析,只涉及四种不同的输入输出方法和五种不同的输出方法,提取出所需模态的固有频率和阻尼比。结果表明,尽管不同的输入-输出方法和不同的仅输出方法共同识别出电网的模态阻尼之间存在良好的一致性,但输入-输出和仅输出方法的结果彼此不同。输入输出模态识别方法的阻尼值平均比仅输出模态识别法的相应值高65%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
60.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 weeks
期刊最新文献
The effect of hydrophobic amorphous carbon powder on the compressive strength, water absorption and rheological attributes of cement mortar Damage Detection in Double Layer Grids with Modal Strain Energy Method and Dempster-Shafer Theory Building Information Modeling Deployment in Oil, Gas and Petrochemical Industry: An Adoption Roadmap The Effects of Cold-Drawn Crimped-End Steel Fibers on the Mechanical and Durability of Concrete Overlay Numerical Investigation of Nailing Pattern Effect on Nailed Wall Performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1