Resistencia a compresión en Bloques de Tierra Comprimida. Comparación entre diferentes métodos de ensayo

IF 0.4 4区 工程技术 Q4 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Informes De La Construccion Pub Date : 2020-10-27 DOI:10.3989/ic.70462
Santiago Cabrera, Ariel Gonzalez, R. Rotondaro
{"title":"Resistencia a compresión en Bloques de Tierra Comprimida. Comparación entre diferentes métodos de ensayo","authors":"Santiago Cabrera, Ariel Gonzalez, R. Rotondaro","doi":"10.3989/ic.70462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, the effect that the geometry of test samples possesses on the average compressive strength determination on compressed earth blocks or CEBs is evaluated, as well as analyzing the effect of heading them with neoprene plates, with the purpose of obtaining references from the experimental process developed that allow to propose the redaction of a technical norm of the Argentinian Institute of Normalization and Certification (IRAM). To this end, specific technical standards for CEB written by Official Standards Organizations from different countries were compiled and analyzed, and the current regulatory framework of Argentina on concrete blocks, hollow and solid ceramic bricks was analyzed. Using CEBs produced by different establishments around the country, tests samples with different geometries were made, and their compressive strength with and without neoprene plates heading was determined. The obtained results indicate that the most adequate test samples for non-confined compressive strength determination on CEBs are an entire block or halve CEB, both in horizontal position and without heading.","PeriodicalId":54981,"journal":{"name":"Informes De La Construccion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informes De La Construccion","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.70462","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In this article, the effect that the geometry of test samples possesses on the average compressive strength determination on compressed earth blocks or CEBs is evaluated, as well as analyzing the effect of heading them with neoprene plates, with the purpose of obtaining references from the experimental process developed that allow to propose the redaction of a technical norm of the Argentinian Institute of Normalization and Certification (IRAM). To this end, specific technical standards for CEB written by Official Standards Organizations from different countries were compiled and analyzed, and the current regulatory framework of Argentina on concrete blocks, hollow and solid ceramic bricks was analyzed. Using CEBs produced by different establishments around the country, tests samples with different geometries were made, and their compressive strength with and without neoprene plates heading was determined. The obtained results indicate that the most adequate test samples for non-confined compressive strength determination on CEBs are an entire block or halve CEB, both in horizontal position and without heading.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
压缩土块的抗压强度。不同测试方法的比较
在本文中,测试样品的几何形状对压缩土块或ceb的平均抗压强度测定的影响进行了评估,并分析了用氯丁橡胶板对它们的影响,目的是从开发的实验过程中获得参考,从而可以提出阿根廷标准化和认证研究所(IRAM)的技术规范。为此,对各国官方标准组织编写的CEB具体技术标准进行了整理和分析,并对阿根廷目前对混凝土砌块、空心砖和实心砖的监管框架进行了分析。利用全国不同机构生产的ceb,制作了不同几何形状的测试样品,并确定了其在有氯丁橡胶板和没有氯丁橡胶板的情况下的抗压强度。结果表明,在水平位置和不带顶头的情况下,最适合测定矿体非侧限抗压强度的试验样品是整块或半块矿体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Informes De La Construccion
Informes De La Construccion 工程技术-结构与建筑技术
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Founded in 1948 by the Instituto Técnico de la Construcción y del Cemento, Informes de la Construcción is a scientific journal issued quarterly. Its articles cover fields such as architecture, engineering, public works, environment, building services, rehabilitation, construction systems, testing techniques, results of research on building components and systems and so forth. Journal"s readership includes architects, engineers and construction companies, as well as researchers and professionals engaging in building construction and public works.
期刊最新文献
El módulo y el sistema: celosías funcionales en el complejo de la Hidrola en Escombreras Las cubiertas planas de tierra en la comarca del Campo de Cartagena (España). Caracterización material y definición constructiva Indoor air quality in naturally ventilated dwellings in Spain Guarino Guarini y el proyecto de escaleras en los tratados italianos Creación de un parque urbano Nuevo índice ASD con un coeficiente de distribución espacial (Estudio de caso: región 1 de Teherán)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1