Reading Sacred Texts: A Qualitative Study of Religious Educators’ Literacy Processes

Eric D. Rackley
{"title":"Reading Sacred Texts: A Qualitative Study of Religious Educators’ Literacy Processes","authors":"Eric D. Rackley","doi":"10.1080/10656219.2020.1838366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Conceptualizing religious literacy as the processes used to construct meaning of sacred texts, this article focuses on how three religious educators read scripture. Data were generated through verbal protocols in which participants read scripture and verbalized their thinking. Inductive thematic analysis yielded a selection of scripture-reading processes in which participants amended scripture by adding, omitting, and substituting words; recognized and evaluated scripture-reading confusion; and tried to balance reading purposes with in-the-moment points of interest. As an empirical examination of the real-life, scripture-reading experiences of religious educators, this study can help clarify how religious educators approach sacred texts.","PeriodicalId":38970,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Christian Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10656219.2020.1838366","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research on Christian Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10656219.2020.1838366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Conceptualizing religious literacy as the processes used to construct meaning of sacred texts, this article focuses on how three religious educators read scripture. Data were generated through verbal protocols in which participants read scripture and verbalized their thinking. Inductive thematic analysis yielded a selection of scripture-reading processes in which participants amended scripture by adding, omitting, and substituting words; recognized and evaluated scripture-reading confusion; and tried to balance reading purposes with in-the-moment points of interest. As an empirical examination of the real-life, scripture-reading experiences of religious educators, this study can help clarify how religious educators approach sacred texts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阅读圣典:宗教教育者读写过程的质性研究
摘要本文将宗教素养定义为构建神圣文本意义的过程,重点讨论三位宗教教育家如何解读经文。数据是通过口头协议生成的,参与者在口头协议中阅读经文并将他们的想法用语言表达出来。归纳主题分析产生了经文阅读过程的选择,其中参与者通过添加,省略和替换单词来修改经文;识别和评估读经混乱;并试图平衡阅读目的和当下的兴趣点。作为对宗教教育者真实的经文阅读经验的实证检验,本研究有助于澄清宗教教育者如何对待神圣文本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Research on Christian Education
Journal of Research on Christian Education Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research on Christian Education (JRCE) provides a vehicle for the scholarly interchange of research findings relative to every level of Christian education. Particular emphasis is given to Christian schooling within the Protestant tradition as well as to research findings from other traditions which have implications for such schools.
期刊最新文献
Servant Leadership and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Indonesian Christian Higher Education: Direct and Indirect Effects A Framework for the Heart-Orientation Dimension of Worldview The CASEL Framework and Christian Schools: Using a Hermeneutical Tool to Determine Worldview Alignment “That Would Be Undemocratic”: Individuality and Educational Differentiation in C. S. Lewis’s “Screwtape Proposes a Toast” (1961) Parables, Pedagogies and Purpose: A Comparison of the Use of Parables within Godly Play and Examples of UK Evangelical Children’s Ministry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1