The Effect of Raising Electricity Price on Welfare of the Household Sector in Rural Areas of Guilan Province, Iran

H. Salehi, Esfandiar Doshman Ziari, M. Ziaei
{"title":"The Effect of Raising Electricity Price on Welfare of the Household Sector in Rural Areas of Guilan Province, Iran","authors":"H. Salehi, Esfandiar Doshman Ziari, M. Ziaei","doi":"10.22004/AG.ECON.262680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Present study investigates the effect of soaring residential electricity price on the welfare of rural individuals in Guilan Province by Almost Ideal Demand System (AIDS) in which the elasticity’s and welfare variations were calculated by Compensation Variations (CV) and Equivalent Variations (EV) for the time period of 1991-2012. It was shown that the absolute value of income and price elasticity of electricity was less than one unit. Low price elasticity of the demand shows the slight impact of price variations on the demand for electricity in the studied period, on the one hand, and the lack of an appropriate substitute for electricity in residential sector, on the other hand. The calculation of welfare variations and its comparison with the share of electricity in the paid subsidy shows that with 50% and 100% increase in residential electricity price, the cash paid to the households is less that the amount acquired. Accordingly, it can be argued that the direct effect of residential electricity price modification (increase) has not been compensated. In fact, the welfare loss of the households, due to more expensive electricity, is more than the acquired welfare. Yet, in a gradual increase scenario, the calculated CV is less than the payments to the families, and hence it is the only price policy that does not impose a loss on families and improves their welfare.","PeriodicalId":13735,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development","volume":"7 1","pages":"245-255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.262680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Present study investigates the effect of soaring residential electricity price on the welfare of rural individuals in Guilan Province by Almost Ideal Demand System (AIDS) in which the elasticity’s and welfare variations were calculated by Compensation Variations (CV) and Equivalent Variations (EV) for the time period of 1991-2012. It was shown that the absolute value of income and price elasticity of electricity was less than one unit. Low price elasticity of the demand shows the slight impact of price variations on the demand for electricity in the studied period, on the one hand, and the lack of an appropriate substitute for electricity in residential sector, on the other hand. The calculation of welfare variations and its comparison with the share of electricity in the paid subsidy shows that with 50% and 100% increase in residential electricity price, the cash paid to the households is less that the amount acquired. Accordingly, it can be argued that the direct effect of residential electricity price modification (increase) has not been compensated. In fact, the welfare loss of the households, due to more expensive electricity, is more than the acquired welfare. Yet, in a gradual increase scenario, the calculated CV is less than the payments to the families, and hence it is the only price policy that does not impose a loss on families and improves their welfare.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高电价对伊朗桂兰农村家庭部门福利的影响
本研究采用近似理想需求系统(AIDS)研究了1991-2012年期间桂兰省居民电价飙升对农村居民福利的影响。结果表明,电力收入的绝对值和价格弹性小于一个单位。需求的低价格弹性表明,一方面,在研究期间,价格变化对电力需求的影响很小,另一方面,住宅部门缺乏适当的电力替代品。福利变化的计算及其与已支付补贴中电力份额的比较表明,随着住宅电价上涨50%和100%,支付给家庭的现金少于获得的金额。因此,可以说,居民电价调整(上涨)的直接影响没有得到补偿。事实上,由于更昂贵的电力,家庭的福利损失超过了获得的福利。然而,在逐步增加的情况下,计算出的CV低于支付给家庭的金额,因此这是唯一不会给家庭带来损失并改善其福利的价格政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Gossiping about the supervisor: the mediating role of follower self-esteem on the relationship between the dark triad traits and workplace gossip Internet technology resources and financial performance by considering the moderating role of human capital Turnaround in hectic times: the influence of CEO attributes under different market conditions Service quality and customer delight; considering the mediating role of satisfaction and loyalty Professional conflicts in public institutions: antecedents, effects and management: a case of Ghana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1