Combining Methods to Estimate Ecosystem Integrity and Ecosystem Service Potentials and Flows for Crop Production in Schleswig-Holstein, Germany

Q2 Environmental Science Landscape Online Pub Date : 2020-04-11 DOI:10.3097/lo.202079
J. Zelený, Sabine Bicking, Kinh Bac Dang, F. Müller
{"title":"Combining Methods to Estimate Ecosystem Integrity and Ecosystem Service Potentials and Flows for Crop Production in Schleswig-Holstein, Germany","authors":"J. Zelený, Sabine Bicking, Kinh Bac Dang, F. Müller","doi":"10.3097/lo.202079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human well-being is highly dependent on nature, especially with respect to food provision. This study has been developed in the ecosystem service framework and focuses on the evaluation of ecological integrity as a base for the capacity of Schleswig-Holstein to provide ecosystem services. The ecosystem service potential is assessed based upon a Bayesian belief network and the study area’s soil fertility. The respective service flow is estimated from official regional statistics, and is represented by the total harvested biomass for food, fodder and energy. The spatial distribution of six different ecological integrity variables and the crop production potentials and flows are compared and interpreted with respect to the characteristics of the main landscape regions within the study area. The results indicate a trade-off between the actual crop production and the underlying ecological integrity and service potentials. This trade-off is strongest in case of croplands, while it gradually diminishes in grasslands and forests. Based on the results, conclusions about the relation between ecosystem services and ecological integrity are drawn. The findings of the study can be used to support the development of sustainable land management strategies, which aim to harmonize agricultural production and environmental conditions. Combining Methods to Estimate Ecosystem Integrity and Ecosystem Service Potentials and Flows for Crop Production in Schleswig-Holstein, Germany","PeriodicalId":38803,"journal":{"name":"Landscape Online","volume":"79 1","pages":"1-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3097/lo.202079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Human well-being is highly dependent on nature, especially with respect to food provision. This study has been developed in the ecosystem service framework and focuses on the evaluation of ecological integrity as a base for the capacity of Schleswig-Holstein to provide ecosystem services. The ecosystem service potential is assessed based upon a Bayesian belief network and the study area’s soil fertility. The respective service flow is estimated from official regional statistics, and is represented by the total harvested biomass for food, fodder and energy. The spatial distribution of six different ecological integrity variables and the crop production potentials and flows are compared and interpreted with respect to the characteristics of the main landscape regions within the study area. The results indicate a trade-off between the actual crop production and the underlying ecological integrity and service potentials. This trade-off is strongest in case of croplands, while it gradually diminishes in grasslands and forests. Based on the results, conclusions about the relation between ecosystem services and ecological integrity are drawn. The findings of the study can be used to support the development of sustainable land management strategies, which aim to harmonize agricultural production and environmental conditions. Combining Methods to Estimate Ecosystem Integrity and Ecosystem Service Potentials and Flows for Crop Production in Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德国石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州作物生产生态系统完整性和生态系统服务潜力及流量的综合评估方法
人类的福祉在很大程度上取决于自然,特别是在粮食供应方面。这项研究是在生态系统服务框架内进行的,重点是评估生态完整性,以此作为石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因提供生态系统服务能力的基础。生态系统服务潜力是基于贝叶斯信念网络和研究区域的土壤肥力进行评估的。各服务流量根据官方区域统计数据估算,并以粮食、饲料和能源的总收获生物量表示。根据研究区域内主要景观区域的特征,比较和解释了六个不同生态完整性变量的空间分布以及作物生产潜力和流量。结果表明,实际作物产量与潜在的生态完整性和服务潜力之间存在权衡。这种权衡在农田中最为强烈,而在草原和森林中则逐渐减少。在此基础上,得出了生态系统服务与生态完整性关系的结论。研究结果可用于支持制定旨在协调农业生产和环境条件的可持续土地管理战略。德国石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州作物生产生态系统完整性和生态系统服务潜力及流量的综合评估方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Landscape Online
Landscape Online Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Landscape Online focuses on studies dealing with landscape research. The subject matter deals with any scientific, educational or applied aspect of processes, dynamics, indicators, controllers and visions related to landscapes. Furthermore, Landscape Online emphasizes the coupling of societal and natural systems, not only the involvement of human impact on landscape systems but also human perception of the landscape, its values and the evaluation of landscapes. Moreover, articles are appropriate that deal with landscape theory, system approaches and conceptual models of landscape, both their improvement and their discussion. Papers may be undisciplinary or multidisciplinary but have interdisciplinary or transdisciplinary appeal. All kinds of articles or parts of it must not be published beforehand in another journal
期刊最新文献
Landscape understanding and values in extended public consultations on spatial planning in rural communes in Poland Assessing ecosystem services of mountain lakes The Usage and Constraints of Urban River Corridor from a Socio-ecological Perspective: a Systematic Review Applying analytic hierarchy process for site selection of a recreational-educational children complex in Shiraz City, Iran Odyssey of First IALE World Congress in Africa and Opportunities for North-South or South-South Collaboration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1