Measures of Resilience: Do They Reflect the Experiences of Transgender Individuals?

IF 2 4区 医学 Q1 Social Sciences Transgender Health Pub Date : 2024-01-31 eCollection Date: 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1089/trgh.2022.0015
Jae A Puckett, Sergio Domínguez, Em Matsuno
{"title":"Measures of Resilience: Do They Reflect the Experiences of Transgender Individuals?","authors":"Jae A Puckett, Sergio Domínguez, Em Matsuno","doi":"10.1089/trgh.2022.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Resilience is often viewed as the ability to bounce back from challenges. This conceptualization tends to be individualistic and can be less fitting for marginalized communities. Research with transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals has shown that resilience can manifest in various ways, such as developing pride in one's identity, connection to a TGD community, or advocating against oppression. Given these conflicting views, we sought to (1) describe common themes in TGD people's experience of resilience by pooling information from qualitative research; and (2) evaluate how well quantitative measures of resilience reflected the ways that TGD people define resilience in qualitative research. We reviewed articles published from January 2010 to January 2020. Our search for research on resilience in TGD samples revealed 33 quantitative articles and 17 qualitative articles. We developed a codebook from the qualitative articles by retrieving information about themes from these past studies (e.g., developing motivation and agency, pride or positive self-image). We also reviewed the quantitative studies and retrieved the measures used to assess resilience, followed by coding these scales to understand whether the themes from the qualitative data were reflected in the quantitative measures of resilience. Overall, themes related to social support were common across the measures. However, other themes were not reflected in any measures, such as self-definition of gender, hope, and self-advocacy. Our research demonstrates the discrepancy between qualitative research on TGD resilience and quantitative measurement of resilience. Measure development that more fully reflects TGD people's experiences is key to advancing this research.</p>","PeriodicalId":37265,"journal":{"name":"Transgender Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10835151/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transgender Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2022.0015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Resilience is often viewed as the ability to bounce back from challenges. This conceptualization tends to be individualistic and can be less fitting for marginalized communities. Research with transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals has shown that resilience can manifest in various ways, such as developing pride in one's identity, connection to a TGD community, or advocating against oppression. Given these conflicting views, we sought to (1) describe common themes in TGD people's experience of resilience by pooling information from qualitative research; and (2) evaluate how well quantitative measures of resilience reflected the ways that TGD people define resilience in qualitative research. We reviewed articles published from January 2010 to January 2020. Our search for research on resilience in TGD samples revealed 33 quantitative articles and 17 qualitative articles. We developed a codebook from the qualitative articles by retrieving information about themes from these past studies (e.g., developing motivation and agency, pride or positive self-image). We also reviewed the quantitative studies and retrieved the measures used to assess resilience, followed by coding these scales to understand whether the themes from the qualitative data were reflected in the quantitative measures of resilience. Overall, themes related to social support were common across the measures. However, other themes were not reflected in any measures, such as self-definition of gender, hope, and self-advocacy. Our research demonstrates the discrepancy between qualitative research on TGD resilience and quantitative measurement of resilience. Measure development that more fully reflects TGD people's experiences is key to advancing this research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弹性测量:它们是否反映了跨性别者的经历?
复原力通常被视为从挑战中反弹的能力。这种概念化倾向于个人主义,可能不太适合边缘化群体。对变性人和性别多元化(TGD)个人的研究表明,抗逆力可以通过各种方式表现出来,例如为自己的身份感到自豪、与 TGD 社区建立联系或倡导反对压迫。鉴于这些相互冲突的观点,我们试图:(1)通过汇集定性研究的信息,描述 TGD 人抗逆力体验中的共同主题;(2)评估抗逆力的定量测量在多大程度上反映了 TGD 人在定性研究中定义抗逆力的方式。我们审查了 2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 1 月期间发表的文章。我们搜索了有关 TGD 样本抗逆力的研究,发现了 33 篇定量研究文章和 17 篇定性研究文章。我们从这些定性文章中检索了有关过去研究主题的信息(例如,发展动力和能动性、自豪感或积极的自我形象),从而编制了一个代码集。我们还回顾了定量研究,并检索了用于评估抗逆力的量表,然后对这些量表进行编码,以了解定性数据中的主题是否反映在抗逆力的定量量表中。总体而言,与社会支持相关的主题在所有测量中都很常见。然而,其他主题在任何测量中都没有反映出来,如性别的自我定义、希望和自我主张。我们的研究表明,有关 TGD 抗逆力的定性研究与抗逆力的定量测量之间存在差异。制定能更充分反映 TGD 人经历的测量方法是推进这项研究的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transgender Health
Transgender Health Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
122
期刊最新文献
Quantitative Assessment of Forehead Morphology Following Facial Feminization Surgery Gender Inclusivity of Canadian Clinical Practice Guidelines Intended to Be Applied or Implemented Based on Sex or Gender: A Descriptive Study The Role of Body Composition Assessment in Tailoring Gender-Affirming Treatment for Transgender/Gender Diverse Youth Barriers to Health Care and Mental Health Among Parents of Transgender and Gender Diverse Youth Re: “Sublingual Estradiol Offers No Apparent Advantage over Combined Oral Estradiol and Cyproterone Acetate for Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy of Treatment-Naive Trans Women: Results of a Prospective Pilot Study” by Yaish et al.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1