Reflections on research with self-harm self-help groups

Q3 Social Sciences Social Work and Social Sciences Review Pub Date : 2020-03-21 DOI:10.1921/SWSSR.V21I1.1366
Melanie Boyce, C. Munn-Giddings
{"title":"Reflections on research with self-harm self-help groups","authors":"Melanie Boyce, C. Munn-Giddings","doi":"10.1921/SWSSR.V21I1.1366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Self-harm remains an area where misconceptions and assumptions continue to prevail, with many people who self-harm reporting feelings of shame, guilt and stigma. Frustration with the behaviourist models that tend to dominate the management of self-harm in statutory services has contributed to the development of self-harm self-help groups, by those with direct experience, as a viable alternative form of support. However, due to concerns some professionals have raised about the safety and value of self-harm self-help groups they largely occupy a marginal position, as a viable source of informal support. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to reflect upon some of the challenges we faced when undertaking research with self-harm self-help groups. Our reflections question the uncritically positioning of certain groups as marginal and suggest that a more nuanced interpretation is required, to avoid simply continuing to position groups of people as being on the margins.Keywords: self-harm; self-help groups; stigma; hard to reach; marginal; reflections","PeriodicalId":53681,"journal":{"name":"Social Work and Social Sciences Review","volume":"21 1","pages":"21-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Work and Social Sciences Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1921/SWSSR.V21I1.1366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Self-harm remains an area where misconceptions and assumptions continue to prevail, with many people who self-harm reporting feelings of shame, guilt and stigma. Frustration with the behaviourist models that tend to dominate the management of self-harm in statutory services has contributed to the development of self-harm self-help groups, by those with direct experience, as a viable alternative form of support. However, due to concerns some professionals have raised about the safety and value of self-harm self-help groups they largely occupy a marginal position, as a viable source of informal support. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to reflect upon some of the challenges we faced when undertaking research with self-harm self-help groups. Our reflections question the uncritically positioning of certain groups as marginal and suggest that a more nuanced interpretation is required, to avoid simply continuing to position groups of people as being on the margins.Keywords: self-harm; self-help groups; stigma; hard to reach; marginal; reflections
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于自残自助团体研究的思考
自残仍然是一个误解和假设继续盛行的领域,许多自残者表示感到羞耻、内疚和耻辱。对倾向于主导法定服务中自残管理的行为主义模式的失望,促使那些有直接经验的人发展了自残自助团体,将其作为一种可行的替代支持形式。然而,由于一些专业人士对自残自助团体的安全和价值表示担忧,他们作为非正式支持的可行来源,在很大程度上处于边缘地位。因此,本文的目的是反思我们在与自残自助团体进行研究时所面临的一些挑战。我们的反思质疑了对某些群体不加批判地定位为边缘群体的做法,并表明需要更细致的解释,以避免简单地继续将群体定位为边缘人群。关键词:自残;自助团体;耻辱难以触及;小的反射
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Work and Social Sciences Review
Social Work and Social Sciences Review Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Web-based mindfulness course for staff working in care homes in Wales for older people with dementia social inclusion of mental health service users in Brazil: Applying SCOPE-B scale Quality of life as a basis for system change Editorial: Celebrating the work of Peter Huxley Historical applications of the Goldberg and Huxley Pathway to Psychiatric Care Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1