Evolution of Japanese security policy and the House of Councilors

IF 1.1 3区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Japanese Journal of Political Science Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1017/S1468109921000086
H. Takenaka
{"title":"Evolution of Japanese security policy and the House of Councilors","authors":"H. Takenaka","doi":"10.1017/S1468109921000086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Japanese security policy has undergone a significant degree of evolution since the early 1990s. As a result, the range of responses Japan can make in international crisis has significantly expanded. The gradual evolution and expansion of the Japanese security policy culminated in the legislation of security-related bills under the second Abe administration in September 2015. The security-related bills dramatically transformed Japanese security policy as it allowed Japan to exercise the right of collective defense when certain conditions are met. The gradual change of Japanese security policy has so far gathered much academic attention. There is a strong claim in the existing literature on Japanese security policy that changes in security policies became possible because of reforms in domestic institutions, which had expanded the Japanese prime minister's power. It is the contention of this article that the Japanese prime minister is still faced with severe constraints from the Diet, in particular from the House of Councilors even after a series of institutional reforms has empowered Japanese prime ministers to significantly alter Japanese security policy. It demonstrates that as the House of Councilors has significant power in the Japanese political system, some Japanese prime ministers had to have the implementation of some security policies delayed or was driven to revise some policies they had originally envisioned through several case studies.","PeriodicalId":44381,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Political Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S1468109921000086","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1468109921000086","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Japanese security policy has undergone a significant degree of evolution since the early 1990s. As a result, the range of responses Japan can make in international crisis has significantly expanded. The gradual evolution and expansion of the Japanese security policy culminated in the legislation of security-related bills under the second Abe administration in September 2015. The security-related bills dramatically transformed Japanese security policy as it allowed Japan to exercise the right of collective defense when certain conditions are met. The gradual change of Japanese security policy has so far gathered much academic attention. There is a strong claim in the existing literature on Japanese security policy that changes in security policies became possible because of reforms in domestic institutions, which had expanded the Japanese prime minister's power. It is the contention of this article that the Japanese prime minister is still faced with severe constraints from the Diet, in particular from the House of Councilors even after a series of institutional reforms has empowered Japanese prime ministers to significantly alter Japanese security policy. It demonstrates that as the House of Councilors has significant power in the Japanese political system, some Japanese prime ministers had to have the implementation of some security policies delayed or was driven to revise some policies they had originally envisioned through several case studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本安全政策的演变与众议院
摘要自20世纪90年代初以来,日本的安全政策经历了很大程度的演变。因此,日本在国际危机中可以做出的反应范围大大扩大。日本安全政策的逐渐演变和扩大最终导致2015年9月第二届安倍政府制定了安全相关法案。与安全相关的法案极大地改变了日本的安全政策,因为它允许日本在满足某些条件时行使集体防御权。日本安全政策的逐渐变化至今已引起学术界的广泛关注。在现有的关于日本安全政策的文献中,有一种强烈的说法认为,由于国内机构的改革,安全政策的改变成为可能,这扩大了日本首相的权力。这篇文章的论点是,即使在一系列体制改革使日本首相有权大幅改变日本安全政策之后,日本首相仍然面临着来自国会,特别是众议院的严重限制。这表明,由于众议院在日本政治体系中拥有重要权力,一些日本首相不得不推迟实施一些安全政策,或者被迫修改他们最初通过几个案例研究设想的一些政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Japanese Journal of Political Science is a broadly based journal aiming to cover developments across a wide range of countries and specialisms. Its scope is wide-ranging both in terms of subject matter and method. The journal features articles in all fields of political science, especially where these have a conceptual thrust including political theory, comparative politics, political behaviour, political institutions, public policy, and international relations. At the same time, the journal seeks to attract the best comparative articles featuring both the domestic and international politics of Japan and East Asia. Each issue contains full length research articles, review articles and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Some head starts are bigger than others: dynastic legacies and variation in candidate quality in Taiwan's local elections The politics of flu vaccines: international collaboration and political partisanship M. J. Green (2022), Line of Advantage. Japan's Grand Strategy in the Era of Abe Shinzō New York: Columbia University Press. 328 pp. JJP volume 24 issue 4 Cover and Back matter Where you stand depends on where you sit: inconsistencies in Taiwan legislators' positions on importing US meat
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1