Deformability of non-prismatic prestressed concrete beams with multiple openings of different configurations

IF 1.7 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1515/jmbm-2022-0013
Amjad Majeed Al-Hilali, A. F. Izzet, N. Oukaili
{"title":"Deformability of non-prismatic prestressed concrete beams with multiple openings of different configurations","authors":"Amjad Majeed Al-Hilali, A. F. Izzet, N. Oukaili","doi":"10.1515/jmbm-2022-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This work presents experimental research using draped prestressed steel strands to improve the load-carrying capacity of prestressed concrete non-prismatic beams with multiple openings of various designs. The short-term deflection of non-prismatic prestressed concrete beams (NPCBs) flexural members under static loading were used to evaluate this improvement. Six simply supported (NPCBs) beams, five beams with openings, and one solid specimen used as a reference beam were all tested as part of the experiment. All of the beams were subjected to a monotonic midpoint load test. The configuration of the opening (quadrilateral or circular), as well as the depth of the chords, were the variables studied in this study. In comparison to a solid beam, experimental results show that beams with openings have a lower load-carrying capacity not exceeding (2.3–10.6%) and higher mid-span deflection through all loading stages of elastic, service, and ultimate loads (14–73%), (19–44%), and (31–55%), respectively. Furthermore, specimens with circular openings had stiffer behaviour under load than those with quadrilateral openings. Beams with quadrilateral openings and inclined posts, on the other hand, were stiffer than beams with quadrilateral openings and vertical posts.","PeriodicalId":17354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials","volume":"31 1","pages":"118 - 126"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jmbm-2022-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract This work presents experimental research using draped prestressed steel strands to improve the load-carrying capacity of prestressed concrete non-prismatic beams with multiple openings of various designs. The short-term deflection of non-prismatic prestressed concrete beams (NPCBs) flexural members under static loading were used to evaluate this improvement. Six simply supported (NPCBs) beams, five beams with openings, and one solid specimen used as a reference beam were all tested as part of the experiment. All of the beams were subjected to a monotonic midpoint load test. The configuration of the opening (quadrilateral or circular), as well as the depth of the chords, were the variables studied in this study. In comparison to a solid beam, experimental results show that beams with openings have a lower load-carrying capacity not exceeding (2.3–10.6%) and higher mid-span deflection through all loading stages of elastic, service, and ultimate loads (14–73%), (19–44%), and (31–55%), respectively. Furthermore, specimens with circular openings had stiffer behaviour under load than those with quadrilateral openings. Beams with quadrilateral openings and inclined posts, on the other hand, were stiffer than beams with quadrilateral openings and vertical posts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同结构多开孔非棱柱形预应力混凝土梁的变形性能
摘要本文介绍了采用悬垂预应力钢绞线提高不同设计的多开口预应力混凝土非棱柱梁承载能力的试验研究。采用静力荷载作用下非柱形预应力混凝土梁受弯构件的短期挠度来评价这种改进。6根简支梁(npcb), 5根开口梁和一个作为参考梁的固体试样都作为实验的一部分进行了测试。所有梁均进行了单调中点荷载试验。开口的结构(四边形或圆形)以及和弦的深度是本研究中研究的变量。试验结果表明:与实心梁相比,开孔梁在弹性荷载、服役荷载和极限荷载各加载阶段的承载力均不超过(2.3 ~ 10.6%),跨中挠度较高(14 ~ 73%),(19 ~ 44%),(31 ~ 55%)。此外,圆形开口的试件在荷载作用下比四边形开口的试件具有更强的刚度。另一方面,四边形开口和斜柱的梁比四边形开口和垂直柱的梁更硬。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials Materials Science-Materials Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
76
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal focuses on the micromechanics and nanomechanics of materials, the relationship between structure and mechanical properties, material instabilities and fracture, as well as size effects and length/time scale transitions. Articles on cutting edge theory, simulations and experiments – used as tools for revealing novel material properties and designing new devices for structural, thermo-chemo-mechanical, and opto-electro-mechanical applications – are encouraged. Synthesis/processing and related traditional mechanics/materials science themes are not within the scope of JMBM. The Editorial Board also organizes topical issues on emerging areas by invitation. Topics Metals and Alloys Ceramics and Glasses Soils and Geomaterials Concrete and Cementitious Materials Polymers and Composites Wood and Paper Elastomers and Biomaterials Liquid Crystals and Suspensions Electromagnetic and Optoelectronic Materials High-energy Density Storage Materials Monument Restoration and Cultural Heritage Preservation Materials Nanomaterials Complex and Emerging Materials.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the mechanical and dynamic properties of scrimber wood produced from date palm fronds Performance of doubly reinforced concrete beams with GFRP bars Blood flow analysis in narrow channel with activation energy and nonlinear thermal radiation Alteration of physicochemical properties of tap water passing through different intensities of magnetic field The peristaltic flow for Carreau fluid through an elastic channel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1