A case for chaos theory inclusion in neuropsychoanalytic modeling

Q3 Psychology Neuropsychoanalysis Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/15294145.2023.2191983
Alexey Tolchinsky
{"title":"A case for chaos theory inclusion in neuropsychoanalytic modeling","authors":"Alexey Tolchinsky","doi":"10.1080/15294145.2023.2191983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper provides a review of the current evidence of chaoticity at various scales of the brain–mind as well as the application of nonlinear tools in clinical practice. Based on these data, a hypothesis is formulated that the brain–mind at various scales can operate in linear, nonlinear, or hybrid modes, such as chaotic functioning accompanied by noise. A thesis formulated by Mark Solms that living systems must minimize Shannon’s entropy of physical states (sensory entropy) is considered. Based on the data presented in this paper, minimization of entropy in that sense appears to be describing only a part of the complex brain–mind dynamics. Studies evaluating measures of entropy specifically developed for real living systems such as discrete timescale entropy (ApEn) suggest that a decrease in EEG entropy can be observed in some neuronal processes (e.g. progression from wakefulness to deep sleep); however, EEG entropy is observed to be increasing at other times and in other modes of brain–mind functioning (e.g. progression from deep sleep to REM to wakefulness; and from vegetative state to wakefulness). The clinical implications are discussed. This paper proposes that it would be theoretically and clinically beneficial for future revisions of neuropsychoanalytic models to consider including the chaos theory framework.","PeriodicalId":39493,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychoanalysis","volume":"25 1","pages":"43 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15294145.2023.2191983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper provides a review of the current evidence of chaoticity at various scales of the brain–mind as well as the application of nonlinear tools in clinical practice. Based on these data, a hypothesis is formulated that the brain–mind at various scales can operate in linear, nonlinear, or hybrid modes, such as chaotic functioning accompanied by noise. A thesis formulated by Mark Solms that living systems must minimize Shannon’s entropy of physical states (sensory entropy) is considered. Based on the data presented in this paper, minimization of entropy in that sense appears to be describing only a part of the complex brain–mind dynamics. Studies evaluating measures of entropy specifically developed for real living systems such as discrete timescale entropy (ApEn) suggest that a decrease in EEG entropy can be observed in some neuronal processes (e.g. progression from wakefulness to deep sleep); however, EEG entropy is observed to be increasing at other times and in other modes of brain–mind functioning (e.g. progression from deep sleep to REM to wakefulness; and from vegetative state to wakefulness). The clinical implications are discussed. This paper proposes that it would be theoretically and clinically beneficial for future revisions of neuropsychoanalytic models to consider including the chaos theory framework.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个将混沌理论纳入神经精神分析模型的案例
摘要:本文综述了目前脑-心智各种尺度的混沌性证据,以及非线性工具在临床实践中的应用。基于这些数据,我们提出了一个假设,即不同尺度的大脑-思维可以以线性、非线性或混合模式运行,例如伴随噪声的混沌功能。马克·索姆斯(Mark Solms)提出的一个论点认为,生命系统必须最小化香农的物理状态熵(感觉熵)。根据本文提供的数据,这种意义上的熵最小化似乎只描述了复杂的脑-心动力学的一部分。评估专为真实生命系统开发的熵测度的研究,如离散时间尺度熵(ApEn),表明可以在一些神经元过程中观察到脑电图熵的减少(例如从清醒到深度睡眠的进展);然而,脑电图熵在其他时间和其他脑-心智功能模式(例如,从深度睡眠到快速眼动再到清醒;从植物人状态到清醒状态)。并讨论了临床意义。本文提出,考虑将混沌理论框架纳入神经精神分析模型的未来修订将在理论上和临床上有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychoanalysis
Neuropsychoanalysis Psychology-Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
A psychological “how-possibly” model of repression Celebration of the 25th anniversary of Neuropsychoanalysis : Saturday, December 2, 2023 Reply to commentaries – the separation distress hypothesis of depression – an update and systematic review Freudian concepts in the twenty-first century: a neuropsychoanalytic update and discussion Abstracts from the 2023 NPSA Congress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1